new set Battle for Zendikar
Moderators: North, BetaSteward, noxx, jeffwadsworth, JayDi, TheElk801, LevelX, CCGHQ Admins
Re: new set Battle for Zendikar
by LevelX » 20 Sep 2015, 22:45
I addded the logic to add Zendikar Expeditions lands to the booster.
What would be the best ratio to add the lands? (I set it now to 1 of 20)
In real boosters they appear a bit more often than foil mythics (1 of ~48) correct me if I'm wrong here.
And do the lands replace the basic land in the booster?
What would be the best ratio to add the lands? (I set it now to 1 of 20)
In real boosters they appear a bit more often than foil mythics (1 of ~48) correct me if I'm wrong here.
And do the lands replace the basic land in the booster?
-
LevelX - DEVELOPER
- Posts: 1677
- Joined: 08 Dec 2011, 15:08
- Has thanked: 174 times
- Been thanked: 374 times
Re: new set Battle for Zendikar
by fireshoes » 21 Sep 2015, 04:42
Foil mythics are approximately 1 in 216 pack, according to this. I'd prefer to keep it a close to the real odds as possible, so it is extra special when you do see one.
Mark Rosewater said on his blog he is 80% certain that the Expedition takes the place of a common in the pack (as foils usually do). Foils are 1:67 cards, according to the ORI booster wrapper (1:4.5 packs), if you want to put in foil logic for booster packs too. I assume they maintain the same rarity ratio as regular packs (10 common:3 uncommon:7/8 rare:1/8 mythic), but that doesn't actually work with the 216 pack number above (would be 540 packs for a foil mythic). It's possible the 216 number is wrong or outdated I suppose.
Mark Rosewater said on his blog he is 80% certain that the Expedition takes the place of a common in the pack (as foils usually do). Foils are 1:67 cards, according to the ORI booster wrapper (1:4.5 packs), if you want to put in foil logic for booster packs too. I assume they maintain the same rarity ratio as regular packs (10 common:3 uncommon:7/8 rare:1/8 mythic), but that doesn't actually work with the 216 pack number above (would be 540 packs for a foil mythic). It's possible the 216 number is wrong or outdated I suppose.
17 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests