New quest decks
Moderators: timmermac, Blacksmith, KrazyTheFox, Agetian, friarsol, CCGHQ Admins
Re: New quest decks
by Sloth » 27 Apr 2011, 19:38
I think the AI won't use morph abilities at instand speed (i.e. when unblocked). It's hard for me to determine the difficulty (but it doesn't look too hard).Corwin72 wrote:Darkseid 2
Is this too much for a level 2?
- | Open
- Darkseid 2
[general]
constructed
[main]
24 Swamp
4 Aphetto Exterminator
4 Cabal Executioner
4 Grinning Demon
4 Headhunter
3 Silent Specter
4 Skinthinner
4 Soul Collector
2 Damnation
3 Overwhelming Forces
4 Wrench Mind
[sideboard]
EDIT: Added your UB deck as Kang 3.
-
Sloth - Programmer
- Posts: 3498
- Joined: 23 Jun 2009, 19:40
- Has thanked: 125 times
- Been thanked: 507 times
Re: New quest decks
by Corwin72 » 27 Apr 2011, 19:55
I missed your response and added the second UB deck.
I will try to play against the Darkseid deck. I would like to see how the AI plays it.
- | Open
- Kang 2
[general]
constructed
[main]
2 Benthic Djinn
2 Dimir Cutpurse
2 Dimir Infiltrator
2 Esper Stormblade
2 Ghastlord of Fugue
2 Glen Elendra Liege
2 Gravelgill Duo
2 Grixis Grimblade
2 Inkfathom Infiltrator
2 Moroii
2 Shadowmage Infiltrator
2 Tidehollow Strix
2 Urborg Drake
2 Vodalian Zombie
2 Wasp Lancer
2 Dire Undercurrents
2 Recoil
2 Undermine
4 Darkslick Shores
4 Drowned Catacomb
8 Island
8 Swamp
[sideboard]
I will try to play against the Darkseid deck. I would like to see how the AI plays it.
-
Corwin72 - Posts: 793
- Joined: 15 Sep 2009, 13:26
- Location: Grayson, Ga
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: New quest decks
by Sloth » 27 Apr 2011, 20:18
Chris already has one I think.Corwin72 wrote:I am too lazy to look up the icon for Wally.
What is it? Wally West Flash?
PS: I've added your Kang 2 deck.
-
Sloth - Programmer
- Posts: 3498
- Joined: 23 Jun 2009, 19:40
- Has thanked: 125 times
- Been thanked: 507 times
Re: New quest decks
by Corwin72 » 27 Apr 2011, 20:28
You made me do it.
I used this link:
http://www.mediafire.com/?sye1yeg6ep9jgql
to check the current icons.
That link was from the most recent update 4/22/2011.
I could not find one called Wally.
I used this link:
http://www.mediafire.com/?sye1yeg6ep9jgql
to check the current icons.
That link was from the most recent update 4/22/2011.
I could not find one called Wally.
-
Corwin72 - Posts: 793
- Joined: 15 Sep 2009, 13:26
- Location: Grayson, Ga
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: New quest decks
by Sloth » 27 Apr 2011, 20:33
See this post: viewtopic.php?f=48&t=4458#p57949Corwin72 wrote:You made me do it.
I used this link:
http://www.mediafire.com/?sye1yeg6ep9jgql
to check the current icons.
That link was from the most recent update 4/22/2011.
I could not find one called Wally.
-
Sloth - Programmer
- Posts: 3498
- Joined: 23 Jun 2009, 19:40
- Has thanked: 125 times
- Been thanked: 507 times
-
Corwin72 - Posts: 793
- Joined: 15 Sep 2009, 13:26
- Location: Grayson, Ga
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: New quest decks
by Corwin72 » 27 Apr 2011, 21:00
Thoughts on Vampire 3?
Edit: Replace Captivating Vampire with Vampire Nocturnus.
AI can not use Captivating Vampire's ability. Program will freeze.
- | Open
- Vampire 3
[general]
constructed
[main]
4 Bloodghast
3 Vampire Nocturnus
4 Gatekeeper of Malakir
4 Kalastria Highborn
4 Pulse Tracker
2 Vampire Hexmage
4 Vampire Lacerator
3 Feast of Blood
3 Arc Trail
2 Burst Lightning
4 Lightning Bolt
4 Blackcleave Cliffs
4 Dragonskull Summit
3 Lavaclaw Reaches
3 Marsh Flats
7 Swamp
2 Verdant Catacombs
[sideboard]
Edit: Replace Captivating Vampire with Vampire Nocturnus.
AI can not use Captivating Vampire's ability. Program will freeze.
-
Corwin72 - Posts: 793
- Joined: 15 Sep 2009, 13:26
- Location: Grayson, Ga
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: New quest decks
by Sloth » 27 Apr 2011, 21:12
Mmh, there's not much synergy between the red cards and the vampires other than getting the opponent to less than 10 life, which is something the AI can't forsee - it will use lightning bolt mostly to kill creatures when the Player is high on life.Corwin72 wrote:Thoughts on Vampire 3?
- | Open
- Vampire 3
[general]
constructed
[main]
4 Bloodghast
3 Captivating Vampire
4 Gatekeeper of Malakir
4 Kalastria Highborn
4 Pulse Tracker
2 Vampire Hexmage
4 Vampire Lacerator
3 Feast of Blood
3 Arc Trail
2 Burst Lightning
4 Lightning Bolt
4 Blackcleave Cliffs
4 Dragonskull Summit
3 Lavaclaw Reaches
3 Marsh Flats
7 Swamp
2 Verdant Catacombs
[sideboard]
And we already have a mono black vampire deck: Bela Lugosi 3.
And I think I remember hearing about some AI problems with Arc Trail.
-
Sloth - Programmer
- Posts: 3498
- Joined: 23 Jun 2009, 19:40
- Has thanked: 125 times
- Been thanked: 507 times
Re: New quest decks
by Chris H. » 27 Apr 2011, 21:13
`Corwin72 wrote:I am too lazy to look up the icon for Wally.
What is it? Wally West Flash?
I included several icons from the Dilbert comic strip. I think that Wally is one of them. The third message in this topic contains an archive with a number of unused icons from you and me.
-
Chris H. - Forge Moderator
- Posts: 6320
- Joined: 04 Nov 2008, 12:11
- Location: Mac OS X Yosemite
- Has thanked: 644 times
- Been thanked: 643 times
Re: New quest decks
by Corwin72 » 27 Apr 2011, 21:25
I was looking for a faster vampire deck that could burn you out after the initial rush.Sloth wrote:Mmh, there's not much synergy between the red cards and the vampires other than getting the opponent to less than 10 life, which is something the AI can't forsee - it will use lightning bolt mostly to kill creatures when the Player is high on life.
And we already have a mono black vampire deck: Bela Lugosi 3.
And I think I remember hearing about some AI problems with Arc Trail.
- | Open
- Bela Lugosi 3
[general]
constructed
[main]
4 Vampire Nocturnus
3 Anowon, the Ruin Sage
4 Malakir Bloodwitch
2 Child of Night
22 Swamp
1 Mox Jet
4 Vampire Nighthawk
4 Bloodghast
4 Ruthless Cullblade
4 Guul Draz Vampire
4 Guul Draz Assassin
4 Go for the Throat
[sideboard]
Bela Lugosi 3 seemed like much more of a mid range deck than the Vampire 3. I wanted to showcase some of the newer cards. Boo.
Vampire Nocturnus does make it closer to the Bela deck.
- | Open
- Vampire 3
[general]
constructed
[main]
4 Bloodghast
3 Arrogant Bloodlord
4 Gatekeeper of Malakir
4 Kalastria Highborn
4 Pulse Tracker
2 Vampire Hexmage
4 Vampire Lacerator
3 Feast of Blood
2 Terminate
3 Burst Lightning
4 Lightning Bolt
4 Blackcleave Cliffs
4 Dragonskull Summit
3 Lavaclaw Reaches
3 Marsh Flats
7 Swamp
2 Verdant Catacombs
[sideboard]
Better or still too close to the other deck?
The only card that the decks now share is Bloodghast.
-
Corwin72 - Posts: 793
- Joined: 15 Sep 2009, 13:26
- Location: Grayson, Ga
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: New quest decks
by Chris H. » 28 Apr 2011, 00:00
`Corwin72 wrote:Bela Lugosi 3 seemed like much more of a mid range deck than the Vampire 3. I wanted to showcase some of the newer cards. Boo.
Vampire Nocturnus does make it closer to the Bela deck.
`Corwin72 wrote:Better or still too close to the other deck?
The only card that the decks now share is Bloodghast.
What if we tone Bela Lugosi 3 down somewhat to a level 2 deck? I like the idea of having a medium and a hard Vampire deck.
We may not want to have two level 3 Vampire decks, but we should have enough cards now to put together a few tribal decks using other types of creatures.
-
Chris H. - Forge Moderator
- Posts: 6320
- Joined: 04 Nov 2008, 12:11
- Location: Mac OS X Yosemite
- Has thanked: 644 times
- Been thanked: 643 times
Re: New quest decks
by Sloth » 28 Apr 2011, 08:58
Yes, maybe you can try to make Bela Lugosi 3 more challenging and make a medium deck with less powerful vampire stuff. I'm not a vampire expert.Chris H. wrote:`Corwin72 wrote:Bela Lugosi 3 seemed like much more of a mid range deck than the Vampire 3. I wanted to showcase some of the newer cards. Boo.
Vampire Nocturnus does make it closer to the Bela deck.`Corwin72 wrote:Better or still too close to the other deck?
The only card that the decks now share is Bloodghast.
What if we tone Bela Lugosi 3 down somewhat to a level 2 deck? I like the idea of having a medium and a hard Vampire deck.
We may not want to have two level 3 Vampire decks, but we should have enough cards now to put together a few tribal decks using other types of creatures.
For comparison here is a version of lazylockie:
- Code: Select all
Bela Lugosi 3
[general]
constructed
[main]
4 Verdant Catacombs
4 Marsh Flats
15 Swamp
1 Mox Jet
4 Vampire Nocturnus
4 Vampire Nighthawk
4 Bloodghast
4 Vampire Lacerator
4 Gatekeeper of Malakir
4 Go for the Throat
4 Sign in Blood
3 Malakir Bloodwitch
3 Guul Draz Assassin
2 Anowon, the Ruin Sage
[sideboard]
-
Sloth - Programmer
- Posts: 3498
- Joined: 23 Jun 2009, 19:40
- Has thanked: 125 times
- Been thanked: 507 times
Re: New quest decks
by Corwin72 » 28 Apr 2011, 14:09
Both decks seem solid to me.
I guess I am from the school of more is better.
My vote would be to keep them both since they feature different cards and strategy. The more decks the better. As long as you are not repeating the same deck. We have more than one White deck Knights(King Arthur) and Soldiers(Blackbeard). Who cares if two decks feature the same tribe if they play differently.
And now for something completely different, here is a UW deck. I think that it is underpowered for level 3.
Thoughts?
I guess I am from the school of more is better.
My vote would be to keep them both since they feature different cards and strategy. The more decks the better. As long as you are not repeating the same deck. We have more than one White deck Knights(King Arthur) and Soldiers(Blackbeard). Who cares if two decks feature the same tribe if they play differently.
And now for something completely different, here is a UW deck. I think that it is underpowered for level 3.
Thoughts?
- | Open
- [general]
constructed
[main]
4 Augury Adept
4 Deft Duelist
4 Esper Cormorants
4 Pride of the Clouds
4 Sky Hussar
4 Thistledown Liege
4 Absorb
4 Curse of Chains
4 Steel of the Godhead
4 Celestial Colonnade
4 Glacial Fortress
6 Island
6 Plains
4 Seachrome Coast
[sideboard]
-
Corwin72 - Posts: 793
- Joined: 15 Sep 2009, 13:26
- Location: Grayson, Ga
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: New quest decks
by Corwin72 » 28 Apr 2011, 14:27
Speaking of King Arthur,
Are these decks too close?
Are these decks too close?
- | Open
- White Knight 3
[general]
constructed
[main]
4 Accorder Paladin
4 Hero of Bladehold
4 Knight Exemplar
4 Leonin Skyhunter
4 Mirran Crusader
4 Student of Warfare
3 White Knight
2 Ajani Goldmane
3 Elspeth Tirel
4 Honor of the Pure
4 Emeria, the Sky Ruin
20 Plains
[sideboard]
- | Open
- White Knight 2
[general]
constructed
[main]
1 Augury Adept
1 Auriok Champion
1 Baneslayer Angel
1 Crovax, Ascendant Hero
1 Emeria Angel
1 Eternal Dragon
1 Glory
1 Intrepid Hero
1 Isamaru, Hound of Konda
1 Kemba, Kha Regent
1 Knight of the White Orchid
1 Mirror Entity
1 Raksha Golden Cub
1 Reveillark
1 Serra Ascendant
1 Serra Avenger
1 Spectral Lynx
1 Stoneforge Mystic
1 Student of Warfare
1 Sun Titan
1 Tivadar of Thorn
1 Transcendent Master
1 Ajani Goldmane
1 Basilisk Collar
1 Crusade
1 Day of Judgment
1 Elspeth Tirel
1 Honor of the Pure
1 Hoofprints of the Stag
1 Martial Coup
1 Scepter of Dominance
1 Sword of Body and Mind
1 Sword of Fire and Ice
1 Sword of Light and Shadow
1 Umezawa's Jitte
1 Wrath of God
24 Plains
[sideboard]
- | Open
- White Knight 1
[general]
constructed
[main]
4 Saltblast
24 Plains
4 Caravan Escort
3 Knight of Meadowgrain
3 Veteran Cavalier
3 Kabira Vindicator
4 Lionheart Maverick
4 Youthful Knight
4 Path to Exile
2 Knight of Cliffhaven
2 Knight Errant
3 Benalish Cavalry
[sideboard]
-
Corwin72 - Posts: 793
- Joined: 15 Sep 2009, 13:26
- Location: Grayson, Ga
- Has thanked: 25 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 63 guests