Bug Reports (snapshot builds)
Moderators: timmermac, Blacksmith, KrazyTheFox, Agetian, friarsol, CCGHQ Admins
Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)
by excessum » 26 Jan 2017, 11:41
r33426
AI was probably trying to evaluate human's Hissing Quagmire in its before combat phase when it also has its own Hissing Quagmire.
AI was probably trying to evaluate human's Hissing Quagmire in its before combat phase when it also has its own Hissing Quagmire.
- ClassCastException | Open
Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)
by Agetian » 26 Jan 2017, 11:56
This should be fixed now (r33429), thanks!excessum wrote:r33426
AI was probably trying to evaluate human's Hissing Quagmire in its before combat phase when it also has its own Hissing Quagmire.
- ClassCastException | Open
- Agetian
- Agetian
- Programmer
- Posts: 3472
- Joined: 14 Mar 2011, 05:58
- Has thanked: 677 times
- Been thanked: 561 times
Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)
by SilencertheK9 » 27 Jan 2017, 07:10
Description: Tried to crew Heart of Kiran using the loyalty counter ability selecting Gideon, Ally of Zendikar. Has crashed the game 4 times in a row
- NullPointerException | Open
- SilencertheK9
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 27 Jan 2017, 06:46
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 0 time
Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)
by twentytwo » 27 Jan 2017, 19:06
r33448 Slow Motion is not forcing me to pay 2 mana or sacrifice a creature at upkeep.
- Attachments
-
Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)
by moush » 27 Jan 2017, 23:53
Came here to report this as well, though I was the one casting Goryo.Marek14 wrote:AI reanimated a creature with Footsteps of the Goryo, but didn't sacrifice it in the end step.
Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)
by Agetian » 28 Jan 2017, 04:18
This has been fixed upstream. Thanks for reporting!twentytwo wrote:r33448 Slow Motion is not forcing me to pay 2 mana or sacrifice a creature at upkeep.
- Agetian
- Agetian
- Programmer
- Posts: 3472
- Joined: 14 Mar 2011, 05:58
- Has thanked: 677 times
- Been thanked: 561 times
Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)
by Agetian » 28 Jan 2017, 04:22
I tested this and it works well in the latest snapshot, so it must have been already taken care of.moush wrote:Came here to report this as well, though I was the one casting Goryo.Marek14 wrote:AI reanimated a creature with Footsteps of the Goryo, but didn't sacrifice it in the end step.
Thanks for reporting!- Agetian
- Agetian
- Programmer
- Posts: 3472
- Joined: 14 Mar 2011, 05:58
- Has thanked: 677 times
- Been thanked: 561 times
Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)
by excessum » 28 Jan 2017, 10:26
r33455
Not sure which version caused it but the AI is returning AiPlayDecision.CantAfford for
{X} creatures like Hangarback Walker and Walking Ballista. The AI was quite capable of using Hangarback Walker back when ORI was Standard-legal last year.
Not sure which version caused it but the AI is returning AiPlayDecision.CantAfford for
{X} creatures like Hangarback Walker and Walking Ballista. The AI was quite capable of using Hangarback Walker back when ORI was Standard-legal last year.Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)
by Agetian » 28 Jan 2017, 14:38
Hopefully remedied in r33460. Thanks!excessum wrote:r33455
Not sure which version caused it but the AI is returning AiPlayDecision.CantAfford for
- Agetian
- Agetian
- Programmer
- Posts: 3472
- Joined: 14 Mar 2011, 05:58
- Has thanked: 677 times
- Been thanked: 561 times
Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)
by twentytwo » 29 Jan 2017, 09:16
Could you add this little change to forge.game.card.CardFactoryUtil.java line 2744:
This:
This:
- Code: Select all
final String counter = "DB$ PutCounter | Defined$ Self | CounterType$ P1P1 | CounterNum$ " + n + " | SpellDescription$ put "
+ Lang.nounWithNumeral(n, "+1/+1 counter") + " on it";
- Code: Select all
final String counter = "DB$ PutCounter | Defined$ Self | CounterType$ P1P1 | CounterNum$ " + n + " | SpellDescription$ Put "
+ Lang.nounWithNumeral(n, "+1/+1 counter") + " on it" + ".";
Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)
by Marek14 » 29 Jan 2017, 22:34
Blight Mamba is blocked by Arcbound Ravager and kills it. The Ravager's modular ability gives no counters.
Now, this is a tricky case, ruleswise. State-based effects cancel +1/+1 and -1/-1 counters at the same time the Ravager dies. But since the Ravager uses LKI when determining how many counters it has, it will see all its +1/+1 counters still on (there is no point where the Ravager is still on the battlefield AND the counters are removed). So in case of lethal -1/-1 counters, modular creatures (and similar effects, plus things like Kinsbaile Borderguard) should still see full amount of counters, before cancellation.
Now, this is a tricky case, ruleswise. State-based effects cancel +1/+1 and -1/-1 counters at the same time the Ravager dies. But since the Ravager uses LKI when determining how many counters it has, it will see all its +1/+1 counters still on (there is no point where the Ravager is still on the battlefield AND the counters are removed). So in case of lethal -1/-1 counters, modular creatures (and similar effects, plus things like Kinsbaile Borderguard) should still see full amount of counters, before cancellation.
Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)
by Agetian » 30 Jan 2017, 16:20
Umm I'm not sure how to fix the issue above, probably someone else will need to take care of it... :/ Sadly, not very familiar with that part of Forge, and couldn't find what's causing it and how to change it without breaking other aspects of the game. Help is very welcome.
I'd like to report something else though that's been bugging me for a while: it looks like the AI is really, really afraid of Vehicles. For example, it once had 7 creatures on the battlefield, most of them with power 2 or 3, and I was at 7 life. The AI could have easily mowed me down by alpha-striking (which it normally would have done at that point). I had only two creatures on the battlefield and a couple vehicles, Aradara Express and some other vehicle. As things stood, I could have either blocked two of the opponent's creatures with my creatures (without crewing anything), or I could have crewed one of my vehicles (but not both at the same time), and overall I would have still had no more than two blockers (since crewing taps at least one creature). Either way I would have taken lethal damage, way more than I had life left (probably around double my life total actually), but the AI did not attack me for 3 consecutive turns, adding one more creature to the board in the process and still not going for lethal. Does anyone know why this is happening? Is the AI somehow wrongly predicting that I can block with all four at once or something? (then again, even if I had four valid active blockers, I still would have taken lethal I think)
- Agetian
I'd like to report something else though that's been bugging me for a while: it looks like the AI is really, really afraid of Vehicles. For example, it once had 7 creatures on the battlefield, most of them with power 2 or 3, and I was at 7 life. The AI could have easily mowed me down by alpha-striking (which it normally would have done at that point). I had only two creatures on the battlefield and a couple vehicles, Aradara Express and some other vehicle. As things stood, I could have either blocked two of the opponent's creatures with my creatures (without crewing anything), or I could have crewed one of my vehicles (but not both at the same time), and overall I would have still had no more than two blockers (since crewing taps at least one creature). Either way I would have taken lethal damage, way more than I had life left (probably around double my life total actually), but the AI did not attack me for 3 consecutive turns, adding one more creature to the board in the process and still not going for lethal. Does anyone know why this is happening? Is the AI somehow wrongly predicting that I can block with all four at once or something? (then again, even if I had four valid active blockers, I still would have taken lethal I think)
- Agetian
- Agetian
- Programmer
- Posts: 3472
- Joined: 14 Mar 2011, 05:58
- Has thanked: 677 times
- Been thanked: 561 times
Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)
by Hanmac » 30 Jan 2017, 16:26
@Marek14: I will look at it and check if I can get some LKI from it if able.
@Agetian: yeah I noticed something too that the AI is VERY afraid of Vehicle. Good for me when I play them xD. I think it does check that your Vehicle is stronger than each of his creatures and so it does not attack. It didn't seems to notice that it can overrun you.
@Agetian: yeah I noticed something too that the AI is VERY afraid of Vehicle. Good for me when I play them xD. I think it does check that your Vehicle is stronger than each of his creatures and so it does not attack. It didn't seems to notice that it can overrun you.
Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)
by chthonodynamis » 02 Feb 2017, 18:23
Description: Started a new commander game via random favorite commander option for myself and ai. Crashed before showing hand immediately upon starting the game.
- ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException | Open
- chthonodynamis
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 11 Mar 2015, 02:27
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 0 time
Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)
by onderzeeboot » 03 Feb 2017, 20:09
r33275 (the last release available at krazy's)
The token created by Voice of Resurgence doesn't trigger evolve when it's bigger than the creature with evolve.
The token created by Voice of Resurgence doesn't trigger evolve when it's bigger than the creature with evolve.
- onderzeeboot
- Posts: 31
- Joined: 29 Nov 2014, 19:37
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 0 time
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: MorganWrage and 101 guests