It is currently 17 Jan 2017, 10:55
   
Text Size

Bug hunters topic

Report wrong Card behavior to get it fixed.
PLEASE ADD SAVEGAMES TO YOUR TOPIC !

Moderators: juzamjedi, Cognis, aww1979, gmzombie, stassy, BAgate, HarlequinCasts, RanDomino, Aswan jaguar, CCGHQ Admins

Re: Bug hunters topic

Postby Aswan jaguar » 14 Sep 2016, 04:17

There are posts where a developer has fixed some bugs but there are others remaining so those don't get to pending reports as they are not finished completely and they don't get checked for the parts that devs have worked upon.
I tried few things and I think the best way is to leave them where they are and mark them to be checked when a new update is up.
I think a "C" = check before the first "[" in the title and a mention in the section of edits is enough (preserving the confirmed icon). What do you think?
e.g.
viewtopic.php?f=86&t=14500&p=152677#p152677
---
Currently working on updating missing & wrong Manalink.ct_all values for AI.
- Long term update all missing & wrong values in Manalink.csv mainly & (maybe)Manalink.ct_all
User avatar
Aswan jaguar
Super Tester
 
Posts: 4838
Joined: 13 May 2010, 12:17
Has thanked: 494 times
Been thanked: 253 times

Re: Bug hunters topic

Postby BAgate » 14 Sep 2016, 08:48

The only problem with that is that they will get pushed down over time and lost, and the visual differentiation isn't that significant.

Maybe changing the [confirmed] to [??CONFIRMED]? Or use the flame icon. Needs some thought.
Working on: housekeeping and archived reports
User avatar
BAgate
Tester
 
Posts: 2439
Joined: 06 Mar 2012, 11:09
Has thanked: 117 times
Been thanked: 156 times

Re: Bug hunters topic

Postby Korath » 14 Sep 2016, 09:57

The usual practice for this on a full bugtracker is to split it.
Korath
DEVELOPER
 
Posts: 3079
Joined: 02 Jun 2013, 05:57
Location: The Land of Blowing and Drifting Snow
Has thanked: 461 times
Been thanked: 880 times

Re: Bug hunters topic

Postby Aswan jaguar » 15 Sep 2016, 03:59

Korath wrote:The usual practice for this on a full bugtracker is to split it
This idea is the cleanest one however the problem lies to what you decide to split and what not.
1- Will dev be interested in the whole history of the report to understand or find easier to fix the remaining problem if I split all the topics that concern the bug but are now fixed?
2- If I split it and split the first report will it change reports id of the one split or of the one remaining.I guess the remaining will still have the same address but don't know for sure.
3- Decide which to split by number of bugs fixed in contrast to bugs remaining?
---
Currently working on updating missing & wrong Manalink.ct_all values for AI.
- Long term update all missing & wrong values in Manalink.csv mainly & (maybe)Manalink.ct_all
User avatar
Aswan jaguar
Super Tester
 
Posts: 4838
Joined: 13 May 2010, 12:17
Has thanked: 494 times
Been thanked: 253 times

Re: Bug hunters topic

Postby Korath » 15 Sep 2016, 22:25

I think the easiest way to do it here would be to create a new thread for the unresolved parts with a link to the old thread, with relevant parts cut-and-pasted, and leave the original thread alone except to add a link to the new one. Actually splitting the thread per-post is probably more trouble than it's worth; in a lot of cases, there'll be posts that refer to both parts of the bug.
Korath
DEVELOPER
 
Posts: 3079
Joined: 02 Jun 2013, 05:57
Location: The Land of Blowing and Drifting Snow
Has thanked: 461 times
Been thanked: 880 times

Re: Bug hunters topic

Postby Aswan jaguar » 04 Oct 2016, 15:45

The edh bugs in archived reports have now been checked.
---
Currently working on updating missing & wrong Manalink.ct_all values for AI.
- Long term update all missing & wrong values in Manalink.csv mainly & (maybe)Manalink.ct_all
User avatar
Aswan jaguar
Super Tester
 
Posts: 4838
Joined: 13 May 2010, 12:17
Has thanked: 494 times
Been thanked: 253 times

Previous

Return to Bug Reports

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

cron

Who is online

In total there are 9 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 9 guests (based on users active over the past 10 minutes)
Most users ever online was 279 on 11 Jul 2013, 22:03

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

Login Form