It is currently 24 May 2013, 01:58
   
Text Size

[Old confirmed] Bug Archive

Report wrong Card behavior to get it fixed.
PLEASE ADD SAVEGAMES TO YOUR TOPIC !

Moderators: jatill, aww1979, juzamjedi, Cognis, Aswan jaguar, Salbei, stassy, CCGHQ Admins

Re: Cards that wrongly inform that you can cast them(Light u

Postby Gargaroz » 15 Feb 2012, 01:19

Fixed.
Gargaroz
Programmer
 
Posts: 3098
Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 11:11
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 290 times

Re: [confirmed]Ichorclaw Myr

Postby Aswan jaguar » 15 Feb 2012, 12:52

Gargaroz,any chance that you used the code of Murk Dwellers (which is close but not the same) to code Ichorclaw Myr and that explains why AI doesn't get that it will pump into 3/3 if blocked?
I changed it's values as they probably "should be" according to similar original coded cards, the AI power,AI toughness and inflatable columns but no luck there.
For example:it seems AI will consider the biggest values of such inflatable creatures.
Murk Dwellers have 4/2 there and inflatable=1
Cave People have 2/4 and inflatable=1
so I changed Ichorclaw Myr to 3/3 and inflatable=1
User avatar
Aswan jaguar
Tester
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: 13 May 2010, 12:17
Has thanked: 111 times
Been thanked: 49 times

Re: Cards corrupting savegames

Postby BlueTemplar » 15 Feb 2012, 12:56

So cards that generate tokens tend to corrupt the save game? No wonder then that my token-heavy Counters & Gilder Bairn decks has this problem so often... any way to fix that, or load the save game anyway?

(afaik saving purpose is only for bug report for us)
I disagree, I tend to use the save game function a lot, for instance when I'm interrupted and I have to stop playing... And think about long marathon games like Gauntlet or Challenges!
User avatar
BlueTemplar
 
Posts: 58
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 22:47
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Cards corrupting savegames

Postby Aswan jaguar » 15 Feb 2012, 13:06

You can try to load your savegame if it is corrupted don't bother to attach it.You can take screen-shots they are not as useful as savegames but do the job sometimes,also you can post the deck so we can try to reproduce the bug,at least until someone fix this,thanks.
User avatar
Aswan jaguar
Tester
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: 13 May 2010, 12:17
Has thanked: 111 times
Been thanked: 49 times

Re: [confirmed]Lorescale Coatl

Postby BlueTemplar » 15 Feb 2012, 14:25

Same problem with Psychic Vortex .
User avatar
BlueTemplar
 
Posts: 58
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 22:47
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

[1st wait response-2nd fixed]]Turntimber Basilisk

Postby Aswan jaguar » 17 Feb 2012, 14:01

Describe the Bug:
If Turntimber Basilisk selects a creature to block it and AI (at least) chooses a second creature (needlessly most times) to block it you can't assign damage to the one you selected with Turntimber Basilisk it finds it as an illegal target so it survives.

Which card did behave improperly ?
Turntimber Basilisk

Which update are you using?(date,name)Which type(Duel,Gauntlet,Sealed Deck)
Manalinlk 3.0 ,DUEL

What exactly should be the correct behavior/interaction ?
Be able to assign damage to the selected with the ability creature if second or more block Turntimber Basilisk.

Are any other cards possibly affected by this bug ?
-
Attachments
Turntimber-assign damage.zip
(3 KiB) Downloaded 13 times
Last edited by Aswan jaguar on 01 Mar 2012, 14:51, edited 2 times in total.
Reason: 1st wait response-2nd fixed
User avatar
Aswan jaguar
Tester
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: 13 May 2010, 12:17
Has thanked: 111 times
Been thanked: 49 times

Re: Turntimber Basilisk-ability

Postby stassy » 17 Feb 2012, 14:13

confirmed, error message is illegal(blocking) on the creature affected by Turntimber Basilisk that have the card effect on it and is forced to block.
stassy
Moderator
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 07:06
Has thanked: 83 times
Been thanked: 137 times

[confirmed]CIP effects-Hexproof

Postby sopcich04 » 18 Feb 2012, 23:12

my Geist of Saint Traft gets bounced by a man-o-war.

using 3.0
Attachments
HEX.rar
(2.13 KiB) Downloaded 18 times
Last edited by Aswan jaguar on 21 Feb 2012, 13:27, edited 5 times in total.
Reason: confirmed bug-renamed to real buggish card
sopcich04
 
Posts: 64
Joined: 08 Dec 2009, 23:13
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Geist of Saint Traft gets bounced by a man-o-war

Postby stassy » 19 Feb 2012, 13:05

Hexproof, approximation, you know the drill...
stassy
Moderator
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 07:06
Has thanked: 83 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Re: [confirmed]Lorescale Coatl

Postby Gargaroz » 19 Feb 2012, 16:52

This is a limit of the original engine : it only let you know "when" you draw, not the quantity of card drawn. I could resolve this through coding, but I need a list of cards in Manalink that do something when someone draw cards.
Gargaroz
Programmer
 
Posts: 3098
Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 11:11
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 290 times

[confirmed]Leyline of Sanctity

Postby Aswan jaguar » 20 Feb 2012, 16:25

Describe the Bug:
Leyline of Sanctity has an incredible redirection to opponent at least for discard spells that I tested.When you target AI protected with Leyline of Sanctity with a discard spell it redirects it :shock: and you get to discard the card-cards.
EDIT-just tested and redirects all kind of spells.
Which card did behave improperly ?
Leyline of Sanctity

Which update are you using?(date,name)Which type(Duel,Gauntlet,Sealed Deck)
Manalink 3.0,duel

What exactly should be the correct behavior/interaction ?
Leyline of Sanctity protects AI or player from spells doesn't redirect the damage-ability to opponent

Are any other cards possibly affected by this bug ?
-

Bring me those discard decks to wipe them out :mrgreen:
Attachments
Leyline of sanctity-tourach.zip
(1.94 KiB) Downloaded 10 times
Last edited by stassy on 20 Feb 2012, 17:42, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: bug confirmed
User avatar
Aswan jaguar
Tester
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: 13 May 2010, 12:17
Has thanked: 111 times
Been thanked: 49 times

Re: Leyline of Sanctity redirects discard effect

Postby stassy » 20 Feb 2012, 17:37

redirection bug confirmed for those spells after check:
Mind Rot
Mind Twist
Mind Sludge
Blightning
Stupor
Wand of Ith
Tribute to Hunger (caster still gain the life benefit even though the spell was redirected)
Diabolic Edict
Geth's Verdict (caster get full effect of the redirected card -sac 1 creature and lose 1 life)
Kaervek's Spite (caster get full effect of the redirected card -all permanent sacced, hand empty and -5 life)
Thoughseize
Taste of Blood (I suspect this spell is redirected but it's like the caster lose 1 life and gain 1 life thus some kind of fizzling :p)
Soul Feast (same as Taste of Blood)
Sorin's Vengeance (same as Taste of Blood, we clearly see the life going up then down on the caster)
Sign in Blood
Sadistic Sacrament

not protected from due to hexproof approx coding:
Ravenous Rat
Recoil
Tendril of Agony
Syphon Soul

No effect/target player spell fizzled normally by Leyline of Sanctity:
Funeral Charm

Redirection work on either the AI or the player, though the AI tend to not cast a lot on the leylined player, for once it's clever.

Stopped checking when I discovered that not only black discard cards could be redirected :p

Also tested with one of my Leyline of Sanctity being Donate -ed, so Donate work really well :pp
stassy
Moderator
 
Posts: 3430
Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 07:06
Has thanked: 83 times
Been thanked: 137 times

Re: [confirmed]Leyline of Sanctity

Postby Gargaroz » 21 Feb 2012, 01:57

Since the whole "hexproof" is an approximation, this card will never work as it supposed to be unless we recode the targeting function. I'll remove it from the next patch.
Gargaroz
Programmer
 
Posts: 3098
Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 11:11
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 290 times

Re: [confirmed]Leyline of Sanctity

Postby Aswan jaguar » 21 Feb 2012, 08:11

1)Gargaroz since the real problem is that the player with Leyline of Sanctity on battlefield isn't found as illegal target to spells from opponent as it should can't you do something so when in play those targets become illegal?

IMHO why it isn't so much problem to have this card as it is:

2)Even if nothing can be done, since it is illegal to target the opponent with Leyline of Sanctity on battlefield just leave the card be and everyone who makes the illegal move to target it will suffer the consequences. :lol:
Just don't target the player and problem is solved.
-You could mention even mention that as a note to the cards text.
User avatar
Aswan jaguar
Tester
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: 13 May 2010, 12:17
Has thanked: 111 times
Been thanked: 49 times

Re: [checked-list needed]Lorescale Coatl

Postby Aswan jaguar » 21 Feb 2012, 12:51

Gargaroz is this a normal procedure you do for each card which causes to draw more than one card?
I am asking because Lorescale Coatl is already working great with so many other cards I tested about 20 and each one worked great.
User avatar
Aswan jaguar
Tester
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: 13 May 2010, 12:17
Has thanked: 111 times
Been thanked: 49 times

PreviousNext

Return to Bug Reports

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


Who is online

In total there are 2 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 2 guests (based on users active over the past 10 minutes)
Most users ever online was 177 on 10 Oct 2011, 16:37

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

Login Form