Page 215 of 228

Re: Formal Request Thread

PostPosted: 11 Sep 2015, 16:28
by addict insane
Can anyone tell me if Bazaar of Baghdad is in the CW? Sorry for being so off-topic.

Re: Formal Request Thread

PostPosted: 11 Sep 2015, 17:36
by Xander9009
addict insane wrote:Can anyone tell me if Bazaar of Baghdad is in the CW? Sorry for being so off-topic.
It is.

Re: Formal Request Thread

PostPosted: 11 Sep 2015, 17:39
by nachonal986
would be nice have coded this card too:
Grand Arbiter Augustin IV

Re: Formal Request Thread

PostPosted: 11 Sep 2015, 17:40
by Xander9009
nachonal986 wrote:would be nice have coded this card too:
Grand Arbiter Augustin IV
It is coded.

Re: Formal Request Thread

PostPosted: 11 Sep 2015, 17:44
by addict insane
Xander9009 wrote:
nachonal986 wrote:would be nice have coded this card too:
Grand Arbiter Augustin IV
It is coded.
I can confirm this, have seen it a million times, tried to play it but oh so slow...

Xander: is Serum Powder or anything remotely resembling it possible at all?

Re: Formal Request Thread

PostPosted: 11 Sep 2015, 17:51
by nachonal986
Xander9009 wrote:
nachonal986 wrote:would be nice have coded this card too:
Grand Arbiter Augustin IV
It is coded.
ohh you right, my fault... Cloud Key is coded too? because I tried but with no lucky

Re: Formal Request Thread

PostPosted: 11 Sep 2015, 17:53
by Xander9009
Doesn't appear so.

Re: Formal Request Thread

PostPosted: 11 Sep 2015, 17:57
by addict insane
Xander9009 wrote:Doesn't appear so.
Wait... who are you answering? Me or nacho?

Re: Formal Request Thread

PostPosted: 11 Sep 2015, 18:00
by Xander9009
addict insane wrote:
Xander9009 wrote:Doesn't appear so.
Wait... who are you answering? Me or nacho?
Sorry. I would have quoted him, but I didn't see your post, so I thought there was only one post to respond to...

Anyway, I was responding to him.

Serum Powder is not possible. At least not without making a function to completely override the mulligan process, which is not something I'm going to attempt considering cards like Chancellor of the Spires.

Re: Formal Request Thread

PostPosted: 11 Sep 2015, 18:11
by addict insane
Yeah, sounds like too much work, anyways.

How about Petrified Field.

Sorry I keep asking about cards without checking the CW, but can't have access to it until the weekend.

Is there anyway we could get a text file of the cards in the CW so those of us who can't power a deck builder up at work can check for a card?

Re: Formal Request Thread

PostPosted: 11 Sep 2015, 19:14
by Xander9009
addict insane wrote:Yeah, sounds like too much work, anyways.

How about Petrified Field.

Sorry I keep asking about cards without checking the CW, but can't have access to it until the weekend.

Is there anyway we could get a text file of the cards in the CW so those of us who can't power a deck builder up at work can check for a card?
Petrified Field is already included, yes. And there are two files you can look at which are automatically made whenever the CW repacks. One of them, I just made.

They're both in this folder. The files you're looking for are Current Card List.txt and Card List.txt. I'll work on giving them more easily differentiable names later, but they provide basically the same information anyway.

I forgot I'd made Card List.txt before, so I just made Current Card List.txt. They'll both stay up-to-date as the wad is repacked. The only differences between the two should be:
Card List.txt is listed in the order cards are made. Rather than being deleted and remade each time the repack occurs, new cards are added to the end. It also marks MM vs non-MM cards and counts them separately.

Current Card List.txt is listed in alphabetical order (with Æ being at the end, for the record). It is deleted and remade each repack, so it should always contain a complete list, even if the other one gets messed up (the function behind Card List.txt is much more complicated, so it much more likely to have problems). It only displays the card name and doesn't consider whether the card is MM or non-MM. So if it is listed, you there's no way to tell if MM is available, non-MM, or both.

Re: Formal Request Thread

PostPosted: 11 Sep 2015, 19:38
by addict insane
Xander9009 wrote:
addict insane wrote:Yeah, sounds like too much work, anyways.

How about Petrified Field.

Sorry I keep asking about cards without checking the CW, but can't have access to it until the weekend.

Is there anyway we could get a text file of the cards in the CW so those of us who can't power a deck builder up at work can check for a card?
Petrified Field is already included, yes. And there are two files you can look at which are automatically made whenever the CW repacks. One of them, I just made.

They're both in this folder. The files you're looking for are Current Card List.txt and Card List.txt. I'll work on giving them more easily differentiable names later, but they provide basically the same information anyway.

I forgot I'd made Card List.txt before, so I just made Current Card List.txt. They'll both stay up-to-date as the wad is repacked. The only differences between the two should be:
Card List.txt is listed in the order cards are made. Rather than being deleted and remade each time the repack occurs, new cards are added to the end. It also marks MM vs non-MM cards and counts them separately.

Current Card List.txt is listed in alphabetical order (with Æ being at the end, for the record). It is deleted and remade each repack, so it should always contain a complete list, even if the other one gets messed up (the function behind Card List.txt is much more complicated, so it much more likely to have problems). It only displays the card name and doesn't consider whether the card is MM or non-MM. So if it is listed, you there's no way to tell if MM is available, non-MM, or both.
You say "in this folder" as if you were about to post a link but didn't. Am I correct?

Re: Formal Request Thread

PostPosted: 11 Sep 2015, 19:43
by Xander9009
addict insane wrote:You say "in this folder" as if you were about to post a link but didn't. Am I correct?
I don't know what you're talking about. I can see the link that I just edited into that post just fine... lol

Re: Formal Request Thread

PostPosted: 14 Sep 2015, 18:47
by addict insane
Xander9009 wrote:
addict insane wrote:You say "in this folder" as if you were about to post a link but didn't. Am I correct?
I don't know what you're talking about. I can see the link that I just edited into that post just fine... lol
XD Sure, you can hide it by editing. My quote without the link gives it away though :roll:

Re: Formal Request Thread

PostPosted: 16 Sep 2015, 17:41
by addict insane
I'd like to request Desperate Ritual.

EDIT: Also Temporal Fissure.