So, I mentioned I was making a site, and I want to know what you guys think. Should I bother with it? I'm really just trying to get it a bit more organized. I figure one thing that could really do with being organized is the bug reporting. Rather than a bunch of posts that a card isn't working, a form would make that really simple. Here's the site (it was just made yesterday, so yes, it's very plain, thus far, and no, I probably won't ever make it fancy):
https://sites.google.com/site/dotpcommunitywadIf you notice, in the sidebar, there's a page for bug reporting and another for previous reports. In the page with previous reports, the list (it's just a spreadsheet) has two pages. The form feeds directly to that list, and when I or someone else has addressed the bug, it can be moved over to the second page (just be sure to copy the data over rather than cutting, because cutting won't work; and then select the entire row of the resolved bug in the reported bugs page and delete the row, NOT just the cells containing data).
I'll try and get the installation page done and then move on to maybe an FAQ and a page for the various tools.
Does anyone have any thoughts on this? If you want to submit a few bugs/test-bugs, feel free (if it's not a real bug, just put "test" somewhere so I know to ignore it). I'd love to make sure it works from your end. I'd especially like to verify it doesn't require a Google account. I'm 99% sure it doesn't, but I'd rather be 100% sure.
If you think it's a dumb idea, you can let me know that, too

For the modders adding cards, if you have the entire Community Wad parent folder added to your Google Drive, you'll notice there's now a Bug Reporting top level folder. This contains the form and the spreadsheet which houses the responses. The responses, of course, should be any currently unresolved bugs on page one and resolved ones on page two.
For users, you can either use the
webpage to submit a bug or use the
form directly outside the website.
Once I've gotten it in a more completed state, I'll post again about it. But I'll be working on this, watching t.v., and working on the auto-coding tool I decided to try throughout the weekend. So, don't expect quick progress (because t.v. will probably take precedence while I have free time with no people to distract me).
OH! I almost forgot to mention. I realized that talking about the bugs would be a little more difficult since we can't quote the post that talks about it. And using only the card name also might not work. However, the Timestamp field should just about always be unique. It's only to the minute, so not necessarily, but it should be often that they overlap. So, you can refer to the bugs by the timestamp.