[fixed] Kasmina's Transmutation doesn't remove all keywords
Posted: 18 Oct 2021, 02:17Describe the Bug:
My other merfolk enchanted by Kasmina's Transmutation with a Lord of Atlantis on the bf don't lose islandwalk, and my Serra Angel enchanted by it loses vigilance but not flying. (The auras have later timestamps than the Lords.) Not just a display issue, either, since the AI doesn't block them with big vanilla nonflyers while controlling an Island, I can still Plummet the angel, and I can still activate Merfolk Assassin targeting the islandwalker.
Which update are you using? (date, name)Which type? (duel, gauntlet, sealed deck)
dev master, cc7a64681.
What exactly should be the correct behavior/interaction?
Enchanted creature loses all abilities. Including islandwalk and flying. (If the other Lord of Atlantis had a later timestamp than the aura, then it should still have islandwalk, but we're not there yet.)
Are any other cards possibly affected by this bug?
I can't find any fully-working auras with "Enchanted creature.*loses all abilities", so yes. But not this precise variant.
My other merfolk enchanted by Kasmina's Transmutation with a Lord of Atlantis on the bf don't lose islandwalk, and my Serra Angel enchanted by it loses vigilance but not flying. (The auras have later timestamps than the Lords.) Not just a display issue, either, since the AI doesn't block them with big vanilla nonflyers while controlling an Island, I can still Plummet the angel, and I can still activate Merfolk Assassin targeting the islandwalker.
Which update are you using? (date, name)Which type? (duel, gauntlet, sealed deck)
dev master, cc7a64681.
What exactly should be the correct behavior/interaction?
Enchanted creature loses all abilities. Including islandwalk and flying. (If the other Lord of Atlantis had a later timestamp than the aura, then it should still have islandwalk, but we're not there yet.)
Are any other cards possibly affected by this bug?
I can't find any fully-working auras with "Enchanted creature.*loses all abilities", so yes. But not this precise variant.