[Fixed] Bug Archive
Moderators: BAgate, drool66, stassy, Aswan jaguar, gmzombie, CCGHQ Admins
Re: [confirmed]Terror of Kruin Pass - again
by Gargaroz » 15 Jan 2012, 15:31
Tried a different solution. I hope it works now.
----
- Current / medium term task: adjusting the code for making Misdirection and such usable
- Long term task: inserting all the good stuff I left out from the "Golden Years" mod
- Current / medium term task: adjusting the code for making Misdirection and such usable
- Long term task: inserting all the good stuff I left out from the "Golden Years" mod
- Gargaroz
- Programmer
- Posts: 7095
- Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 11:11
- Has thanked: 82 times
- Been thanked: 593 times
[fixed by Gargaroz]Lashwrithe
by stassy » 16 Jan 2012, 04:21
Describe the Bug:
When cast, Lashwrithe create an equipped 0/1 Eldrazi Spawn instead of an equipped 0/0 Black Germ token.
Which card did behave improperly ?
Lashwrithe
Which Version did you use ?(Constructed, Limited)and which update(date,name)
2k+beta1
What exactly should be the correct behavior/interaction ?
When cast, Lashwrithe should create an equipped 0/0 Black Germ token.
Are any other cards possibly affected by this bug ?
Batterskull, Flayer Husk, Mortar Pod, Necropouncer, Sickleslicer, Skinwing, Strandwalker
After check, all of them are creating the wrong token.
When cast, Lashwrithe create an equipped 0/1 Eldrazi Spawn instead of an equipped 0/0 Black Germ token.
Which card did behave improperly ?
Lashwrithe
Which Version did you use ?(Constructed, Limited)and which update(date,name)
2k+beta1
What exactly should be the correct behavior/interaction ?
When cast, Lashwrithe should create an equipped 0/0 Black Germ token.
Are any other cards possibly affected by this bug ?
Batterskull, Flayer Husk, Mortar Pod, Necropouncer, Sickleslicer, Skinwing, Strandwalker
After check, all of them are creating the wrong token.
- Attachments
-
1.zip- (2.29 KiB) Downloaded 69 times
Last edited by Aswan jaguar on 17 Jan 2012, 17:36, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: fixed bug
Reason: fixed bug
- stassy
- Moderator
- Posts: 5274
- Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 07:06
- Has thanked: 471 times
- Been thanked: 337 times
Re: Lashwrithe
by Aswan jaguar » 16 Jan 2012, 08:46
I don't know if Gargaroz fixed-coded all related bugs as tokens had to be added again as they were replaced to save slots.
You have either placed wrong savegame as in decks are only Last Grasp s,or we have slightly different versions.
You have either placed wrong savegame as in decks are only Last Grasp s,or we have slightly different versions.
---
Trying to squash some bugs and playtesting.
Trying to squash some bugs and playtesting.
-

Aswan jaguar - Super Tester Elite
- Posts: 7450
- Joined: 13 May 2010, 12:17
- Has thanked: 639 times
- Been thanked: 351 times
Re: Lashwrithe
by stassy » 16 Jan 2012, 09:04
Well, with the flood of csv/xls floating around, it was to be expected. What is supposed to be the last csv update?
My id for Lashwrithe is 11034 and Last Gasp is 1445, what is your?
My id for Lashwrithe is 11034 and Last Gasp is 1445, what is your?
- stassy
- Moderator
- Posts: 5274
- Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 07:06
- Has thanked: 471 times
- Been thanked: 337 times
Re: Lashwrithe
by Aswan jaguar » 16 Jan 2012, 09:38
Well for Last Grasp is the same,for Lashwrithe is 11305.=that,s for Beta1
I believe your version is a bit messed up what you have because neither in Beta1 the savegame is correct(Last Grasp) nor inBeta2Beta1 with new csv changes+files by Sonic and Mok, where Lashwrithe is there but it puts correctly a Germ token.
So,at least for the Lashwrithe bug is already fixed.
I believe your version is a bit messed up what you have because neither in Beta1 the savegame is correct(Last Grasp) nor in
So,at least for the Lashwrithe bug is already fixed.
---
Trying to squash some bugs and playtesting.
Trying to squash some bugs and playtesting.
-

Aswan jaguar - Super Tester Elite
- Posts: 7450
- Joined: 13 May 2010, 12:17
- Has thanked: 639 times
- Been thanked: 351 times
Re: Lashwrithe
by Aswan jaguar » 16 Jan 2012, 11:06
My wrong I meant Beta1 with new csv changes+files by Sonic and Mok.
---
Trying to squash some bugs and playtesting.
Trying to squash some bugs and playtesting.
-

Aswan jaguar - Super Tester Elite
- Posts: 7450
- Joined: 13 May 2010, 12:17
- Has thanked: 639 times
- Been thanked: 351 times
Re: Lashwrithe
by stassy » 16 Jan 2012, 11:19
Are you talking about this update?:
http://www.mediafire.com/?nt6a92914d5rnxd
xls_csv.rar
Because I unpacked into Magic\magic_updater, ran Magic_updater.bat and copied the resulting created files :
Cards.dat
DBinfo.dat
Rarity.dat
Magic.exe
into the root folder and I still get the Lashwrithe token issue...
http://www.mediafire.com/?nt6a92914d5rnxd
xls_csv.rar
Because I unpacked into Magic\magic_updater, ran Magic_updater.bat and copied the resulting created files :
Cards.dat
DBinfo.dat
Rarity.dat
Magic.exe
into the root folder and I still get the Lashwrithe token issue...
- stassy
- Moderator
- Posts: 5274
- Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 07:06
- Has thanked: 471 times
- Been thanked: 337 times
Re: Lashwrithe
by Aswan jaguar » 16 Jan 2012, 11:53
I may not have installed the above csv -corrected files in contrast with you but have the new DB_v2 probably unlike you with new cards.dat ,.... and anyway I do have the Germ token working 
---
Trying to squash some bugs and playtesting.
Trying to squash some bugs and playtesting.
-

Aswan jaguar - Super Tester Elite
- Posts: 7450
- Joined: 13 May 2010, 12:17
- Has thanked: 639 times
- Been thanked: 351 times
Re: Lashwrithe
by stassy » 16 Jan 2012, 12:04
if you have db_v2 that mean you are using the Deckbuilder update, not sure what to trust now since you appear to have correct token working but on the other side Orion79 struggle with id cards with the same update...
And also to quote Mok again :
Well from now on I will disregard token bug since there are many I noticed (Hero of Bladehold...)until beta2.
And also to quote Mok again :
That mean if you have Deckbuilder update you can't verify bugs since it miss Gargaroz latest code...though if you can tell that the next beta2 will included latest Deckbuilder from Mok + Gargaroz update, the id bug will resolve by itself...ncluded Magic.exe/*.dat/*.dll are from latest xls update from Sonic but without the latest code from Gargaroz. Still it might work a bit better as I compiled the dll against the corrected order of card ids.
Post DB bugs here and I'll try to fix them if possible. Don't post card bugs from this version anywhere,
Well from now on I will disregard token bug since there are many I noticed (Hero of Bladehold...)until beta2.
- stassy
- Moderator
- Posts: 5274
- Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 07:06
- Has thanked: 471 times
- Been thanked: 337 times
Re: Lashwrithe
by Aswan jaguar » 16 Jan 2012, 12:20
The only real problem is that appears you messed the Beta1 the one we use to report,confirm bugs although some will be in both others not.
For the updated with Mok-Sonic changes we will all have to wait Gargaroz to release beta2.Mok posted this mainly for Gargaroz and ONLY for test purposes of the new submitted csv by Sonic to see general bugs things missing or messed not card bugs.
For the updated with Mok-Sonic changes we will all have to wait Gargaroz to release beta2.Mok posted this mainly for Gargaroz and ONLY for test purposes of the new submitted csv by Sonic to see general bugs things missing or messed not card bugs.
---
Trying to squash some bugs and playtesting.
Trying to squash some bugs and playtesting.
-

Aswan jaguar - Super Tester Elite
- Posts: 7450
- Joined: 13 May 2010, 12:17
- Has thanked: 639 times
- Been thanked: 351 times
[fixed by Gargaroz]Lhurgoyf
by Aswan jaguar » 16 Jan 2012, 16:41
Describe the Bug:
Lhurgoyf has wrongly 0/2 with no creatures in both graveyards.
Which card did behave improperly ?
Which Version did you use ?(Constructed, Limited)and which update(date,name)
ManalinkAll-beta
What exactly should be the correct behavior/interaction ?
Lhurgoyf has 0/1 with no creatures at both graveyards.
Are any other cards possibly affected by this bug ?
Lhurgoyf has wrongly 0/2 with no creatures in both graveyards.
Which card did behave improperly ?
Which Version did you use ?(Constructed, Limited)and which update(date,name)
ManalinkAll-beta
What exactly should be the correct behavior/interaction ?
Lhurgoyf has 0/1 with no creatures at both graveyards.
Are any other cards possibly affected by this bug ?
Last edited by Aswan jaguar on 27 Jan 2012, 22:48, edited 2 times in total.
Reason: fixed bug
Reason: fixed bug
---
Trying to squash some bugs and playtesting.
Trying to squash some bugs and playtesting.
-

Aswan jaguar - Super Tester Elite
- Posts: 7450
- Joined: 13 May 2010, 12:17
- Has thanked: 639 times
- Been thanked: 351 times
[fixed by Gargaroz]Shrine of Piercing Vision
by Aswan jaguar » 16 Jan 2012, 17:44
Describe the Bug:
Shrine of Piercing Vision doesn't put a card into my hand.
Which card did behave improperly ?
Shrine of Piercing Vision
Which Version did you use ?(Constructed, Limited)and which update(date,name)
ManalinkALL-beta
What exactly should be the correct behaviour/interaction ?
Shrine of Piercing Vision must put the chosen card into my hand.
Are any other cards possibly affected by this bug ?
Shrine of Piercing Vision doesn't put a card into my hand.
Which card did behave improperly ?
Shrine of Piercing Vision
Which Version did you use ?(Constructed, Limited)and which update(date,name)
ManalinkALL-beta
What exactly should be the correct behaviour/interaction ?
Shrine of Piercing Vision must put the chosen card into my hand.
Are any other cards possibly affected by this bug ?
Last edited by Aswan jaguar on 17 Jan 2012, 17:48, edited 2 times in total.
Reason: fixed bug
Reason: fixed bug
---
Trying to squash some bugs and playtesting.
Trying to squash some bugs and playtesting.
-

Aswan jaguar - Super Tester Elite
- Posts: 7450
- Joined: 13 May 2010, 12:17
- Has thanked: 639 times
- Been thanked: 351 times
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests
