Ok i can suppose the files are not encrypted with ( AES/DES/3DES/RC4/RC2/RC2-64/non-OAEP key wrapping ) this because if we look closely to the version needed we found (0x14) = 2.0 and if we compare this info with PKWARE specification about the versions : 4.4.3.1
The minimum supported ZIP specification version needed
to extract the file, mapped as above. This value is based on
the specific format features a ZIP program MUST support to
be able to extract the file. If multiple features are
applied to a file, the minimum version MUST be set to the
feature having the highest value. New features or feature
changes affecting the published format specification will be
implemented using higher version numbers than the last
published value to avoid conflict. 4.4.3.2
Current minimum feature versions are as defined below: 1.0 - Default value
1.1 - File is a volume label
2.0 - File is a folder (directory)
2.0 - File is compressed using Deflate compression
2.0 - File is encrypted using traditional PKWARE encryption
2.1 - File is compressed using Deflate64(tm)
2.5 - File is compressed using PKWARE DCL
Implode 2.7 - File is a patch data set
4.5 - File uses ZIP64 format extensions
4.6 - File is compressed using BZIP2 compression*
5.0 - File is encrypted using DES
5.0 - File is encrypted using 3DES
5.0 - File is encrypted using original RC2 encryption
5.0 - File is encrypted using RC4 encryption
5.1 - File is encrypted using AES encryption
5.1 - File is encrypted using corrected RC2 encryption**
5.2 - File is encrypted using corrected RC2-64 encryption**
6.1 - File is encrypted using non-OAEP key wrapping***
6.2 - Central directory encryption
6.3 - File is compressed using LZMA
6.3 - File is compressed using PPMd+
6.3 - File is encrypted using Blowfish
6.3 - File is encrypted using Twofish
So if the file are encrypted with basic PKWARE encryption it should be really easy to broken as like there are many tools to recover password from zip files, it should be not so strong....