Astral

Nyth was laughing about this article to me: http://www.wizards.com/Magic/Magazine/Article.aspx?x=mtg/daily/arcana/124. In particular, how much better our pics look.
Original:

Ours:

But can we do better? According to the article, we're missing the Swampwalk text "(If defending player controls any swamps this creature is unblockable.)"
I also see that we're not using the proper fonts, and I think we should. Those fonts are here: http://www.mediafire.com/?hj2ohnmjml0.
We also added copyright text, which is not representative either.
And the mana symbols, particularly the two colorless, look grayer than what we're using.
Original:

Ours:

But can we do better? According to the article, we're missing the Swampwalk text "(If defending player controls any swamps this creature is unblockable.)"
I also see that we're not using the proper fonts, and I think we should. Those fonts are here: http://www.mediafire.com/?hj2ohnmjml0.
We also added copyright text, which is not representative either.
And the mana symbols, particularly the two colorless, look grayer than what we're using.