It is currently 14 May 2025, 21:42
   
Text Size

Forge Beta: 09-08-2012 ver 1.2.13

Moderators: timmermac, Blacksmith, KrazyTheFox, Agetian, friarsol, CCGHQ Admins

Re: Forge Beta: 09-08-2012 ver 1.2.13

Postby L33TLobster » 18 Sep 2012, 03:51

 Time Vault can be untapped at the end of the AI's turn without skipping your next turn
Last edited by Chris H. on 18 Sep 2012, 10:22, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Mouse-over
L33TLobster
 
Posts: 1
Joined: 09 Sep 2012, 06:08
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Forge Beta: 09-08-2012 ver 1.2.13

Postby Sloth » 18 Sep 2012, 05:56

Emfatic wrote:The computer's Lash Out did the damage but did not Clash.
I can't reproduce this. :?:
Emfatic wrote:The card, Cryptoplasm says it may copy another creature yet during upkeep, when it asks which creature it should copy, the cancel button is greyed out. I am forced to target a new creature. Here's an example of when I would not want to retarget the same creature it already is. If it was a copy Veiled Serpent that has already converted to a 4/4 creature, when I copy the 4/4 Veiled Serpent creature again, it reverts to being an enchantment.
Emfatic wrote:
Emfatic wrote:Here's a crash report.

I was in the deck editor. I was using the "Add 4 of a card" button to add 1 card to a deck of 286 (ya, crazy I know :-" ). I am unable to reproduce this error.
Further testing shows that I can reproduce this error when I click "Add 4 of a card" when nothing is selected, as in when you just open the deck editor, or the card catalog is empty. There is no error when you click "Add 1 of a card" however. I've added another crash report.
Both fixed! Thanks Emfatic.

correioalternativo wrote:AI mistake: computer plays the second The Tabernacle at Pendrell Vale. I never noticed this with others legendary permanents.
Did the AI play the land normally?

L33TLobster wrote:Time Vault can be untapped at the end of the AI's turn without skipping your next turn
Fixed! Thanks L33TLobster.
User avatar
Sloth
Programmer
 
Posts: 3498
Joined: 23 Jun 2009, 19:40
Has thanked: 125 times
Been thanked: 507 times

Re: Forge Beta: 09-08-2012 ver 1.2.13

Postby Doomlord » 18 Sep 2012, 20:15

When the computer attacked me with a creature with annihilator (Artisan of Kozilek), the annihilator did not trigger, and I did not have to sacrifice anything. I suspect that this may have had something to do with the fact that I had a Ghostly Prison in play at the time.
Doomlord
 
Posts: 47
Joined: 07 Dec 2011, 21:07
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Forge Beta: 09-08-2012 ver 1.2.13

Postby Emfatic » 18 Sep 2012, 20:38

Sloth wrote:
Emfatic wrote:The computer's Lash Out did the damage but did not Clash.
I can't reproduce this. :?:
If I remember correctly, I sacrificed my creature before the damage could kill it, so perhaps because there was no creature left, the Clash did not trigger. Is this correct behaviour?
Emfatic
 
Posts: 75
Joined: 30 Aug 2012, 19:17
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Forge Beta: 09-08-2012 ver 1.2.13

Postby muppet » 18 Sep 2012, 20:56

more converted mana cost trouble. I have Counterbalance in play with Snapcaster Mage on top. AI casts a Green Sun's Zenith for 2 which it fails to counter.

As another useful feature could the amount of mana paid for x spells be included somewhere it can be hard to tell how much mana the ai is using for spells.
muppet
Tester
 
Posts: 590
Joined: 03 Aug 2011, 14:37
Has thanked: 33 times
Been thanked: 30 times

Re: Forge Beta: 09-08-2012 ver 1.2.13

Postby friarsol » 18 Sep 2012, 21:23

Emfatic wrote:
Sloth wrote:
Emfatic wrote:The computer's Lash Out did the damage but did not Clash.
I can't reproduce this. :?:
If I remember correctly, I sacrificed my creature before the damage could kill it, so perhaps because there was no creature left, the Clash did not trigger. Is this correct behaviour?
Yes, because there are no legal targets anymore and the Lash Out fizzled.
friarsol
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 7593
Joined: 15 May 2010, 04:20
Has thanked: 243 times
Been thanked: 965 times

Re: Forge Beta: 09-08-2012 ver 1.2.13

Postby cc-drake » 18 Sep 2012, 21:24

When I control Fettergeist, and in my upkeep I control no other creatures, I get
Code: Select all
This is a Crash Report. An error has occurred. Please save this message to a file.
Please follow the instructions at this address to submit this Crash Report, plus what you were doing at the time:
   http://tinyurl.com/3zzrnyb
Reporting bugs in Forge is very important. We thank you for your time.

Index: 0, Size: 0


Version:
Forge version 1.2.13-r16750

OS: Windows XP Version: 5.1 Architecture: x86

Java Version: 1.6.0_35 Vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.

Detailed error trace:
java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index: 0, Size: 0
   at java.util.ArrayList.RangeCheck(Unknown Source)
   at java.util.ArrayList.get(Unknown Source)
   at forge.GameActionUtil.payCostDuringAbilityResolve(GameActionUtil.java:452)
   at forge.card.abilityfactory.AbilityFactory.passUnlessCost(AbilityFactory.java:2781)
   at forge.card.abilityfactory.AbilityFactory.resolve(AbilityFactory.java:2839)
   at forge.card.spellability.SpellAbilityRequirements.finishPaying(SpellAbilityRequirements.java:190)
   at forge.card.cost.CostPayment.payCost(CostPayment.java:227)
   at forge.card.cost.CostPayment.paidCost(CostPayment.java:190)
   at forge.card.cost.CostMana.payHuman(CostMana.java:219)
   at forge.card.cost.CostPayment.payCost(CostPayment.java:221)
   at forge.card.spellability.SpellAbilityRequirements.startPaying(SpellAbilityRequirements.java:179)
   at forge.card.spellability.SpellAbilityRequirements.needPayment(SpellAbilityRequirements.java:165)
   at forge.card.spellability.SpellAbilityRequirements.fillRequirements(SpellAbilityRequirements.java:132)
   at forge.GameAction.playSpellAbilityNoStack(GameAction.java:2039)
   at forge.card.trigger.TriggerHandler$2.resolve(TriggerHandler.java:1001)
   at forge.card.abilityfactory.AbilityFactory.resolve(AbilityFactory.java:2831)
   at forge.game.zone.MagicStack.resolveStack(MagicStack.java:940)
   at forge.game.phase.PhaseHandler.passPriority(PhaseHandler.java:877)
   at forge.game.player.ComputerAIGeneral.playSpellAbilities(ComputerAIGeneral.java:342)
   at forge.control.input.InputControl.updateInput(InputControl.java:260)
   at forge.gui.GuiInput.update(GuiInput.java:58)
   at java.util.Observable.notifyObservers(Unknown Source)
   at java.util.Observable.notifyObservers(Unknown Source)
   at forge.util.MyObservable.updateObservers(MyObservable.java:41)
   at forge.control.input.InputControl.resetInput(InputControl.java:146)
   at forge.game.phase.PhaseHandler.passPriority(PhaseHandler.java:866)
   at forge.control.input.InputPassPriority.selectButtonOK(InputPassPriority.java:76)
   at forge.gui.GuiInput.selectButtonOK(GuiInput.java:92)
   at forge.gui.match.controllers.CMessage$2.actionPerformed(CMessage.java:52)
   at javax.swing.AbstractButton.fireActionPerformed(Unknown Source)
   at javax.swing.AbstractButton$Handler.actionPerformed(Unknown Source)
   at javax.swing.DefaultButtonModel.fireActionPerformed(Unknown Source)
   at javax.swing.DefaultButtonModel.setPressed(Unknown Source)
   at javax.swing.AbstractButton.doClick(Unknown Source)
   at javax.swing.AbstractButton.doClick(Unknown Source)
   at forge.gui.toolbox.FButton$1.keyPressed(FButton.java:89)
   at java.awt.Component.processKeyEvent(Unknown Source)
   at javax.swing.JComponent.processKeyEvent(Unknown Source)
   at java.awt.Component.processEvent(Unknown Source)
   at java.awt.Container.processEvent(Unknown Source)
   at java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Unknown Source)
   at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Unknown Source)
   at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Unknown Source)
   at java.awt.KeyboardFocusManager.redispatchEvent(Unknown Source)
   at java.awt.DefaultKeyboardFocusManager.dispatchKeyEvent(Unknown Source)
   at java.awt.DefaultKeyboardFocusManager.preDispatchKeyEvent(Unknown Source)
   at java.awt.DefaultKeyboardFocusManager.typeAheadAssertions(Unknown Source)
   at java.awt.DefaultKeyboardFocusManager.dispatchEvent(Unknown Source)
   at java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Unknown Source)
   at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Unknown Source)
   at java.awt.Window.dispatchEventImpl(Unknown Source)
   at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Unknown Source)
   at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEventImpl(Unknown Source)
   at java.awt.EventQueue.access$400(Unknown Source)
   at java.awt.EventQueue$2.run(Unknown Source)
   at java.awt.EventQueue$2.run(Unknown Source)
   at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
   at java.security.AccessControlContext$1.doIntersectionPrivilege(Unknown Source)
   at java.security.AccessControlContext$1.doIntersectionPrivilege(Unknown Source)
   at java.awt.EventQueue$3.run(Unknown Source)
   at java.awt.EventQueue$3.run(Unknown Source)
   at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
   at java.security.AccessControlContext$1.doIntersectionPrivilege(Unknown Source)
   at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(Unknown Source)
   at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForFilters(Unknown Source)
   at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForFilter(Unknown Source)
   at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(Unknown Source)
   at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(Unknown Source)
   at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(Unknown Source)
   at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(Unknown Source)
cc-drake
 
Posts: 570
Joined: 14 Aug 2010, 07:15
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Re: Forge Beta: 09-08-2012 ver 1.2.13

Postby Emfatic » 19 Sep 2012, 00:45

I used Telemin Performance and got a Rukh Egg. When I blocked with the Rukh Egg and died, there were two 4/4 bird creature tokens on the stack, not 1.

At the end of the turn, two bird tokens were indeed put into play, but on the computer's side. Shouldn't it have come into play on my side?
Emfatic
 
Posts: 75
Joined: 30 Aug 2012, 19:17
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: Forge Beta: 09-08-2012 ver 1.2.13

Postby correioalternativo » 19 Sep 2012, 00:54

Sloth wrote:
correioalternativo wrote:AI mistake: computer plays the second The Tabernacle at Pendrell Vale. I never noticed this with others legendary permanents.
Did the AI play the land normally?


I don't remember, maybe Manabond was in play (40 lands deck).
User avatar
correioalternativo
 
Posts: 279
Joined: 23 Jul 2012, 12:01
Has thanked: 255 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Re: Forge Beta: 09-08-2012 ver 1.2.13

Postby friarsol » 19 Sep 2012, 01:04

correioalternativo wrote:I don't remember, maybe Manabond was in play (40 lands deck).
Well, if he activated Manabond he would be required to play all his lands.
friarsol
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 7593
Joined: 15 May 2010, 04:20
Has thanked: 243 times
Been thanked: 965 times

Re: Forge Beta: 09-08-2012 ver 1.2.13

Postby Xitax » 19 Sep 2012, 01:06

I cannot play the card hidden away with Mosswort Bridge - I have creatures with total power of 10 exactly.

Details: In play are 2 Llanowar Elves, Joraga Treespeaker with no level counters, Elvish Archdruid, and Elvish Visionary.

Also, Mosswort Bridge, et al. don't let me look at my hideaway card.
Last edited by Xitax on 19 Sep 2012, 01:51, edited 3 times in total.
Xitax
 
Posts: 918
Joined: 16 May 2010, 17:19
Has thanked: 183 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Re: Forge Beta: 09-08-2012 ver 1.2.13

Postby correioalternativo » 19 Sep 2012, 01:26

friarsol wrote:
correioalternativo wrote:I don't remember, maybe Manabond was in play (40 lands deck).
Well, if he activated Manabond he would be required to play all his lands.
I know. The Tabernacle at Pendrell Vale and some Maze of Ith were locking me until computer drew the second The Tabernacle at Pendrell Vale and played it without need, what made me win the game. I posted the case for an eventual AI improvement.

Sorry for my poor English and I hope you can understand me.
User avatar
correioalternativo
 
Posts: 279
Joined: 23 Jul 2012, 12:01
Has thanked: 255 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Re: Forge Beta: 09-08-2012 ver 1.2.13

Postby mcrawford620 » 19 Sep 2012, 04:58

Gauntlet of Might did not seem to provide me with an extra red mana for my mountains. I cast Fireball, and tapped 5 mountains total, but did not deal 9 damage.
mcrawford620
 
Posts: 112
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 16:59
Has thanked: 55 times
Been thanked: 25 times

Re: Forge Beta: 09-08-2012 ver 1.2.13

Postby moomarc » 19 Sep 2012, 05:04

mcrawford620 wrote:Gauntlet of Might did not seem to provide me with an extra red mana for my mountains. I cast Fireball, and tapped 5 mountains total, but did not deal 9 damage.
Are you sure the additional mana wasn't still sitting in your mana pool? I know that's how it works with Nirkana Revenant (i.e. even if you're busy paying a cost the extra mana is added to your pool.)
Edit: Just tested and definitely working in the svn version (it does just add the extra mana to your pool as suspected). So if it was broken, its since been fixed.
-Marc
User avatar
moomarc
Pixel Commander
 
Posts: 2091
Joined: 04 Jun 2010, 15:22
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 371 times
Been thanked: 372 times

Re: Forge Beta: 09-08-2012 ver 1.2.13

Postby Xitax » 19 Sep 2012, 05:37

timmermac wrote:
I'm really thinking that it's the fact that you're using HQ images. I don't think Forge fully supports them anymore due to heap space and other performance issues.
Nope. I didn't see how that could be the case, but I made a copy of Forge folder then dl'ed the LQ pics just to test it out.
Xitax
 
Posts: 918
Joined: 16 May 2010, 17:19
Has thanked: 183 times
Been thanked: 133 times

PreviousNext

Return to Forge

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests


Who is online

In total there are 33 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 33 guests (based on users active over the past 10 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4143 on 23 Jan 2024, 08:21

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests

Login Form