question
Can't be countered vs. Can't be countered by spells or abilities.
What's the difference? I've kind of just treated them the same.
What's the difference? I've kind of just treated them the same.
High Quality Resources for Collectible Card Games and Home of the CCGHQ Team
https://www.slightlymagic.net/forum/
https://www.slightlymagic.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=1675
The difference is that "Can't be countered by spells or abilities." appears on targeted spells. If the target of spell is illegal, it's countered by game rules anyways, despite the fact that it's normally uncounterable. Basically, it's warranted to treat both the same, as long as you remember that uncounterability doesn't cover illegal targets case.DennisBergkamp wrote:Can't be countered vs. Can't be countered by spells or abilities.
What's the difference? I've kind of just treated them the same.
The term "fizzle" was removed in Sixth Edition. The only card which actually cares about it is Multani's Presence, though (it draws cards for spells that are counterspelled as well as those that fizzle). Once again, though, the game is longer without fizzle by now than it ever was with it.Rob Cashwalker wrote:I don't get why they call it "countered", while elsewhere I've seen the term "fizzle", which is more accurate and flavorful(?). The spell loses its magical effects because its target is no longer legal. They should have renamed it in the game rules. A spell should only be countered by another spell, not the game rules.