Re: Card Requests
Just tested, and got it working. Now added to SVN.slapshot5 wrote:I've started this. I've got it coded in my local code, but haven't tested at all.
I got sidetracked for the last week and a half or so.
-slapshot5
-slapshot5
High Quality Resources for Collectible Card Games and Home of the CCGHQ Team
https://www.slightlymagic.net/forum/
https://www.slightlymagic.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=2091
Just tested, and got it working. Now added to SVN.slapshot5 wrote:I've started this. I've got it coded in my local code, but haven't tested at all.
I got sidetracked for the last week and a half or so.
-slapshot5
It's such a pain in the ass to write. At some point we'll have enough tools to be able to handle it properly, but for now things will have to wait while we build up other tools to handle it.srecko wrote:Could you implement Yawgmoth's will?
It's one of the most broken and abused cards in vintage.
Maybe I just don't know how to program, but would it be possible to hack a copy which gives flashback to all the cards in your graveyard?friarsol wrote:It's such a pain in the ass to write. At some point we'll have enough tools to be able to handle it properly, but for now things will have to wait while we build up other tools to handle it.srecko wrote:Could you implement Yawgmoth's will?
It's one of the most broken and abused cards in vintage.
I'm probably not the right person to suggest that to. I think I might be the most strict of the devs when it comes to *not* hacking things together. I probably cringe everytime I see something given a "close enough" makeover. (Like Chub Toad)Magic Pancake wrote:Maybe I just don't know how to program, but would it be possible to hack a copy which gives flashback to all the cards in your graveyard?
Wait, why is Chub Toad hacked together? Couldn't it be done pretty easily with AF + triggers? Seems like it would need two separate T:Mode$ Blocks lines, once for when it blocks and once for when it becomes blocked, both of which could lead to a single SVar:Trig line giving it the +2/+2 pump. What am I missing here?friarsol wrote: I probably cringe everytime I see something given a "close enough" makeover. (Like Chub Toad)
Chub Toad can be done as you say, but it's currently implemented as Bushido 2. It does not have Bushido because it is not a Samurai.Zirbert wrote:Wait, why is Chub Toad hacked together? Couldn't it be done pretty easily with AF + triggers? Seems like it would need two separate T:Mode$ Blocks lines, once for when it blocks and once for when it becomes blocked, both of which could lead to a single SVar:Trig line giving it the +2/+2 pump. What am I missing here?friarsol wrote: I probably cringe everytime I see something given a "close enough" makeover. (Like Chub Toad)
And why do I ask that last question so often around here?
Don't answer that one. You might hurt my feelings.
-Zirbert
You must admit, however, that a Samurai Frog would be awesome.slapshot5 wrote:Chub Toad can be done as you say, but it's currently implemented as Bushido 2. It does not have Bushido because it is not a Samurai.
-slapshot5
Don't we already have that?Drudger wrote:Any chance for Songs of the Damned ? It's the only card needed to make a Fluctuator deck fun.
`friarsol wrote:Don't we already have that?Drudger wrote:Any chance for Songs of the Damned ? It's the only card needed to make a Fluctuator deck fun.
My apologies. Need to check that I have updated version before talking again.Chris H. wrote:Yes, just checked and we do: