Collectible Card Game Headquarters

...it appears to only be r9920, when according to WebSVN, it should be 1002x. Did I grab the wrong thing? It was http://cardforge.org/releases/snapshots/forge/forge/1.1.3-SNAPSHOT/forge-1.1.3-20110828.121256-10.tar.bz2 .

timmermac wrote:...it appears to only be r9920, when according to WebSVN, it should be 1002x. Did I grab the wrong thing? It was http://cardforge.org/releases/snapshots/forge/forge/1.1.3-SNAPSHOT/forge-1.1.3-20110828.121256-10.tar.bz2 .

`
I got a 404 error when I clicked on the link that you provided. I can download the file by visiting http://cardforge.org/releases/snapshots/forge/forge/1.1.3-SNAPSHOT/ and clicking on the link from there. Strange.

timmermac wrote:...it appears to only be r9920, when according to WebSVN, it should be 1002x. Did I grab the wrong thing? It was http://cardforge.org/releases/snapshots/forge/forge/1.1.3-SNAPSHOT/forge-1.1.3-20110828.121256-10.tar.bz2 .

@timmermac, there is a period at the end of your url. corrected form:
http://cardforge.org/releases/snapshots/forge/forge/1.1.3-SNAPSHOT/forge-1.1.3-20110828.121256-10.tar.bz2

timmermac wrote:...it appears to only be r9920, when according to WebSVN, it should be 1002x. Did I grab the wrong thing?

nope. the SVN Rev in the manifest is wrong. Dave or Chris, can you help?

yesterday's build also claims to be 9920.

I verified that the rev number is wrong. Not sure what is wrong since I doubt Chris was so far behind on updating his local copy. To avoid this issue, I can set the rev check in Maven to automatically update the local copy during the snapshot deployment.

jendave wrote:I verified that the rev number is wrong. Not sure what is wrong since I doubt Chris was so far behind on updating his local copy. To avoid this issue, I can set the rev check in Maven to automatically update the local copy during the snapshot deployment.

`
Yeah, I first merge all of the new work into my local copy. I then run set info script to update the new cards. From there I add in all the commit logs to the changes.txt file.

I then run the nightly build maven script. I can not explain what is happening.

I just now released the next nightly build. I made sure that I first updated my local copy. The startup screen has the close box and the new card Frenetic Sliver is available.

At the New Game screen I selected Menu -> Stack Report. The Forge Version displayed is my java version and the build ID is displayed as 9920 rather than 10085.

Chris H. wrote:I just now released the next nightly build. I made sure that I first updated my local copy. The startup screen has the close box and the new card Frenetic Sliver is available.

At the New Game screen I selected Menu -> Stack Report. The Forge Version displayed is my java version and the build ID is displayed as 9920 rather than 10085.

This is very strange. I just updated and built Forge. The Menu -->Stack Report gives me 10089 as expected. Maybe the BuildNumber Maven plugin does not like Lion? Still, I would think you would get a null or a "0000" (the default I set).

jendave wrote:This is very strange. I just updated and built Forge. The Menu -->Stack Report gives me 10089 as expected. Maybe the BuildNumber Maven plugin does not like Lion? Still, I would think you would get a null or a "0000" (the default I set).

`
This is strange indeed, here is the start of the Stack Report on my machine:

Stack Report | Open

This is a Crash Report. An error has occurred. Please save this message to a file.
Please follow the instructions at this address to submit this Crash Report, plus what you were doing at the time:
http://tinyurl.com/3zzrnyb
Reporting bugs in Forge is very important. We thank you for your time.

You requested a full error report


Version:
Forge version 1.6.0_26, build ID 9920

OS: Mac OS X Version: 10.7.1 Architecture: x86_64

Java Version: 1.6.0_26 Vendor: Apple Inc.

Detailed error trace:

Signal Dispatcher (6):

In message: Re: Forge Beta: 08-19-2011 ver 1.1.2 rev 9812

jendave wrote:I just put up a new daily build.
http://cardforge.org/releases/snapshots/forge/forge/

`
I downloaded the windows/*nix version (forge-1.1.3-20110831.074528-15.tar.bz2) and ran it with my old shell script that increases the java heap space. I am currently booted into Lion.

I am now looking at the Stack Report. The Forge version number reported is the java version number but the build ID is correct this time around.

Stack Report | Open

This is a Crash Report. An error has occurred. Please save this message to a file.
Please follow the instructions at this address to submit this Crash Report, plus what you were doing at the time:
http://tinyurl.com/3zzrnyb
Reporting bugs in Forge is very important. We thank you for your time.

You requested a full error report


Version:
Forge version 1.6.0_26, build ID 10104

OS: Mac OS X Version: 10.7.1 Architecture: x86_64

Java Version: 1.6.0_26 Vendor: Apple Inc.

Detailed error trace:

Chris H. wrote:In message: Re: Forge Beta: 08-19-2011 ver 1.1.2 rev 9812

jendave wrote:I just put up a new daily build.
http://cardforge.org/releases/snapshots/forge/forge/

`
I downloaded the windows/*nix version (forge-1.1.3-20110831.074528-15.tar.bz2) and ran it with my old shell script that increases the java heap space. I am currently booted into Lion.

I am now looking at the Stack Report. The Forge version number reported is the java version number but the build ID is correct this time around.

Stack Report | Open

This is a Crash Report. An error has occurred. Please save this message to a file.
Please follow the instructions at this address to submit this Crash Report, plus what you were doing at the time:
http://tinyurl.com/3zzrnyb
Reporting bugs in Forge is very important. We thank you for your time.

You requested a full error report


Version:
Forge version 1.6.0_26, build ID 10104

OS: Mac OS X Version: 10.7.1 Architecture: x86_64

Java Version: 1.6.0_26 Vendor: Apple Inc.

Detailed error trace:

`
I booted into Snow Leopard and tried the same test and got the same results as above. Dave, when you run this test on Snow Leopard, are you getting the java number returned as the Forge version number?

Chris H. wrote:

Chris H. wrote:In message: Re: Forge Beta: 08-19-2011 ver 1.1.2 rev 9812

jendave wrote:I just put up a new daily build.
http://cardforge.org/releases/snapshots/forge/forge/

`
I downloaded the windows/*nix version (forge-1.1.3-20110831.074528-15.tar.bz2) and ran it with my old shell script that increases the java heap space. I am currently booted into Lion.

I am now looking at the Stack Report. The Forge version number reported is the java version number but the build ID is correct this time around.

Stack Report | Open

This is a Crash Report. An error has occurred. Please save this message to a file.
Please follow the instructions at this address to submit this Crash Report, plus what you were doing at the time:
http://tinyurl.com/3zzrnyb
Reporting bugs in Forge is very important. We thank you for your time.

You requested a full error report


Version:
Forge version 1.6.0_26, build ID 10104

OS: Mac OS X Version: 10.7.1 Architecture: x86_64

Java Version: 1.6.0_26 Vendor: Apple Inc.

Detailed error trace:

`
I booted into Snow Leopard and tried the same test and got the same results as above. Dave, when you run this test on Snow Leopard, are you getting the java number returned as the Forge version number?

I see the same thing on Snow Leopard. There is a user in the Developing Bugs thread that is using the snapshot I posted last night and the version number appears correctly. I suspect there is an issue with the code that displays the stack report.