TODO LIST: 0.99r
by Jorbes
Moderators: Jorbes, CCGHQ Admins
Re: TODO LIST: 0.99r
by -Azul- » 03 Jun 2010, 17:10
Wow, it looks like 0.99r is almost complete and ready judging from you checklist. Can't wait to see it out in the wild.
- -Azul-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 18:57
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 0 time
Re: TODO LIST: 0.99r
by tojammot » 03 Jun 2010, 20:15
[quote=jorbes]When trying to fix this, I notice the settings are already so it should stay on top. Do you have the latest version? And if so, what OS do you run on?[/quote]
I am running 0.99p on Windows Xp (32 bit).
Now that I tested with the .dck-files in the decks\-directory, the 'Show Card Data'-window acts correctly on top when running OPT in the full screen mode.
I have this humongous apprentice .dec file which seems to break the hovering.
http://filebeam.com/9e5a4175eece7ff6e30 ... del=978857
Rename that to mtg.dec and see if you can duplicate the issue with this (it takes a while to load).
I am running 0.99p on Windows Xp (32 bit).
Now that I tested with the .dck-files in the decks\-directory, the 'Show Card Data'-window acts correctly on top when running OPT in the full screen mode.
I have this humongous apprentice .dec file which seems to break the hovering.
http://filebeam.com/9e5a4175eece7ff6e30 ... del=978857
Rename that to mtg.dec and see if you can duplicate the issue with this (it takes a while to load).
Re: TODO LIST: 0.99r
by Jorbes » 03 Jun 2010, 22:16
maybe its the 4000+ cards causing the problem.
the settings are good, so it should be fine for "normal" decks.
may i ask what the large dec is for?
the settings are good, so it should be fine for "normal" decks.
may i ask what the large dec is for?
Re: TODO LIST: 0.99r
by tojammot » 05 Jun 2010, 20:52
My collection.may i ask what the large dec is for?
I've saved it into other formats (.dck .mwDeck .dec) but no matter what format, it seems that OPT is not very fast with large files.
Re: TODO LIST: 0.99r
by Jorbes » 05 Jun 2010, 22:22
Yeah, the deckbuilder was written wayyyy before I even started on OPT, so it's not my best work. Then again, it's meant to create decks, not large collections.tojammot wrote:My collection.may i ask what the large dec is for?
I've saved it into other formats (.dck .mwDeck .dec) but no matter what format, it seems that OPT is not very fast with large files.
One day I will start on a collection manager, untill then, I would suggest using other programs to keep track of your collection, maybe a plain text file would suit nicely?
Re: TODO LIST: 0.99r
by -Azul- » 06 Jun 2010, 03:01
I use MTG Studio for collection management. It's actually really good and is still actively being worked on. He updates it about once a month or so. You can save in a lot of formats (like .mwdeck) and it has excellent filters to use when making decks. I use it in conjunction with OPT all the time.
- -Azul-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 18:57
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 0 time
Re: TODO LIST: 0.99r
by Clefaria » 06 Jun 2010, 06:36
You should mention the significant price tag.-Azul- wrote:I use MTG Studio for collection management. It's actually really good and is still actively being worked on. He updates it about once a month or so. You can save in a lot of formats (like .mwdeck) and it has excellent filters to use when making decks. I use it in conjunction with OPT all the time.
__________
MWS bundle is DISCONTINUED, current only through M12
My (old) MWS bundle
MWS bundle is DISCONTINUED, current only through M12
My (old) MWS bundle
-
Clefaria - Posts: 267
- Joined: 17 Aug 2009, 22:43
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 0 time
Re: TODO LIST: 0.99r
by tojammot » 06 Jun 2010, 11:08
[quote=Jorbes]it's meant to create decks, not large collections.[/quote]
Yeah, I expected this to be out of the scope of the design, so no worries.
[quote=Jorbes]I would suggest using other programs to keep track of your collection, maybe a plain text file would suit nicely?[/quote]
I created after OPT a more convenient and faster solution by constructing a predictable mtg dictionary script onto vim. It's equally fast to add cards than OPT's deck editor.
Yeah, I expected this to be out of the scope of the design, so no worries.
[quote=Jorbes]I would suggest using other programs to keep track of your collection, maybe a plain text file would suit nicely?[/quote]
I created after OPT a more convenient and faster solution by constructing a predictable mtg dictionary script onto vim. It's equally fast to add cards than OPT's deck editor.
Re: TODO LIST: 0.99r
by Jorbes » 08 Jun 2010, 12:53
I've looked more into the slow processing of large deck files.
I have made some improvements now, the 4000+ deck loads in a few seconds now and making changes to it also goes at "okay" speed.
Maybe some day I will rewrite the deckbuilder from scratch in an open source project, probably in .Net code, but for now, this will have to do.
I have made some improvements now, the 4000+ deck loads in a few seconds now and making changes to it also goes at "okay" speed.
Maybe some day I will rewrite the deckbuilder from scratch in an open source project, probably in .Net code, but for now, this will have to do.
39 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest