Revision 19514
Moderators: timmermac, Blacksmith, KrazyTheFox, Agetian, friarsol, CCGHQ Admins
17 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: Revision 19514
by Max mtg » 12 Feb 2013, 13:16
Oh! There's another case we should consider.
When a single creature blocks several attackers (consider pumped Palace Guard) are attackers arranged in the same way by blocker's controller, so that the first attacker has to be killed before damage can be assigned to the next one?
Upd: Read 510.1d... Looks like that kind of blocking will use the same rules as the ones applied to attacker blocked by several things.
When a single creature blocks several attackers (consider pumped Palace Guard) are attackers arranged in the same way by blocker's controller, so that the first attacker has to be killed before damage can be assigned to the next one?
Upd: Read 510.1d... Looks like that kind of blocking will use the same rules as the ones applied to attacker blocked by several things.
Single class for single responsibility.
- Max mtg
- Programmer
- Posts: 1997
- Joined: 02 Jul 2011, 14:26
- Has thanked: 173 times
- Been thanked: 334 times
Re: Revision 19514
by friarsol » 12 Feb 2013, 15:05
Yep, this should already be in place, and will use the same dialog.Max mtg wrote:Oh! There's another case we should consider.
When a single creature blocks several attackers (consider pumped Palace Guard) are attackers arranged in the same way by blocker's controller, so that the first attacker has to be killed before damage can be assigned to the next one?
Upd: Read 510.1d... Looks like that kind of blocking will use the same rules as the ones applied to attacker blocked by several things.
- friarsol
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 7593
- Joined: 15 May 2010, 04:20
- Has thanked: 243 times
- Been thanked: 965 times
17 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests