It is currently 30 Oct 2025, 09:05
   
Text Size

Rule Changes

Post MTG Forge Related Programming Questions Here

Moderators: timmermac, Agetian, friarsol, Blacksmith, KrazyTheFox, CCGHQ Admins

Rule Changes

Postby friarsol » 23 May 2013, 12:18

http://wizards.com/Magic/Magazine/Artic ... ature/248e

A few changes that make 0 sense themetically, but are for the good of new players.

Funnily enough "Playing Additional Lands" is exactly how we handle Play Additional Lands right now. So that's pretty nice.
friarsol
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 7593
Joined: 15 May 2010, 04:20
Has thanked: 243 times
Been thanked: 965 times

Re: Rule Changes

Postby swordshine » 23 May 2013, 12:40

friarsol wrote:Funnily enough "Playing Additional Lands" is exactly how we handle Play Additional Lands right now. So that's pretty nice.
:mrgreen: Unexpect Results :mrgreen:

I don't like the legendary/planeswalker rule changes. Thrun, the Last Troll is insane and Clones are much weaker. Thespian's Stage can clone Dark Depths and Marit Lage comes.
We should also convert some effects to AnimateAll effect because of "Indestructible Promoted to Keyword" :evil: (Rootborn Defenses, Ready // Willing, Frontline Medic, Boros Charm).
swordshine
 
Posts: 682
Joined: 11 Jul 2010, 02:37
Has thanked: 116 times
Been thanked: 87 times

Re: Rule Changes

Postby friarsol » 31 May 2013, 23:33

swordshine wrote:We should also convert some effects to AnimateAll effect because of "Indestructible Promoted to Keyword" :evil: (Rootborn Defenses, Ready // Willing, Frontline Medic, Boros Charm).
I think they'll get converted to PumpAll not AnimateAll.

I'm working on upgrading the Sideboard for M14 rules now. The only thing that I don't have right now is being able to sideboard a 75/0 deck into a 60/15. But this means that people who don't have Sideboards might get annoyed by a useless popup to sideboard. Any thoughts of how to handle this?
friarsol
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 7593
Joined: 15 May 2010, 04:20
Has thanked: 243 times
Been thanked: 965 times

Re: Rule Changes

Postby Diogenes » 01 Jun 2013, 00:13

friarsol wrote:I'm working on upgrading the Sideboard for M14 rules now. The only thing that I don't have right now is being able to sideboard a 75/0 deck into a 60/15. But this means that people who don't have Sideboards might get annoyed by a useless popup to sideboard. Any thoughts of how to handle this?
Unless I'm mistaken, the way I understand the new rules is that unless you're running a strict 60/0 you'll always have the option to sideboard after the first match whether you intend to or not (you always have a sideboard now, even if it's empty during the first game.) I'd imagine that the sideboard prompt should always appear except in the case of 60/0, but it might be nice to have a "don't prompt me again" tick box.
Diogenes
 
Posts: 201
Joined: 12 Jul 2012, 00:54
Has thanked: 39 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Re: Rule Changes

Postby friarsol » 01 Jun 2013, 01:56

Diogenes wrote:I'd imagine that the sideboard prompt should always appear except in the case of 60/0, but it might be nice to have a "don't prompt me again" tick box.
Yea that's mostly what I'm talking about. I don't want to annoy indecisive people who build 61 card decks and don't have any plans to sideboard, but I also don't want to be too restrictive for the people who are experimenting with empty sideboards. Maybe a preference that says "Open empty sideboards between matches" and then for minimum main decks/empty sideboards skip the dialog, otherwise check the users preference.
friarsol
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 7593
Joined: 15 May 2010, 04:20
Has thanked: 243 times
Been thanked: 965 times

Re: Rule Changes

Postby Diogenes » 01 Jun 2013, 05:19

I guess I just don't see the sideboard popping up as a major nuisance. It's easy enough to dismiss.

I get what you're saying about not wanting to annoy people, but at the same time it's an option that the game rules are giving you - disabling it outside the match feels a little bit weird to me, since skipping the whole process is just two clicks for a best-of-three match. I personally don't feel there are enough savings here to merit extra entries in the game options.

One elegant solution for the future would be to integrate the results screen with the sideboarding interface. It would be unobtrusive for those who don't want to sideboard, and would cut down on the number of UI screens between games.

Also, there are situations where the current sideboarding logic won't apply: DotP decks and old 40+15 decks come to mind. An option not to enforce rules compliance would be nice.
Diogenes
 
Posts: 201
Joined: 12 Jul 2012, 00:54
Has thanked: 39 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Re: Rule Changes

Postby moomarc » 01 Jun 2013, 08:10

Forward/backward compatibility is always a pain. In my ideal world there would be a "pre-M14 rules" option that allowed you to switch (in fact if the world was perfect there would be radio button selection for rule sets so that you could enforce rules from different eras, but that simply isn't plausible and probably breaks various modern cards if used with legacy rules).
-Marc
User avatar
moomarc
Pixel Commander
 
Posts: 2091
Joined: 04 Jun 2010, 15:22
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 371 times
Been thanked: 372 times

Re: Rule Changes

Postby friarsol » 01 Jun 2013, 13:11

Diogenes wrote:I get what you're saying about not wanting to annoy people, but at the same time it's an option that the game rules are giving you - disabling it outside the match feels a little bit weird to me, since skipping the whole process is just two clicks for a best-of-three match. I personally don't feel there are enough savings here to merit extra entries in the game options.
Yea that was my original feeling before I started overthinking it. Maybe I'll just go that way for now. Especially since playing different decks you may want to do things differently, and setting a preference outside is definitely an oddity here.

I think we already have deck conformance preference to be able to play a 40/15 constructed deck, so no matter what the player sideboards in or out, since your conformance is off, it should accept the output.
friarsol
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 7593
Joined: 15 May 2010, 04:20
Has thanked: 243 times
Been thanked: 965 times


Return to Developer's Corner

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests

Main Menu

User Menu

Our Partners


Who is online

In total there are 12 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 12 guests (based on users active over the past 10 minutes)
Most users ever online was 9298 on 10 Oct 2025, 12:54

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests

Login Form