friarsol wrote:Ahh.. I think the booster arrangements from the Draft dialog is just every possible arrangement of packs, which provides way more possibilities than what would commonly be seen for that block.
Yup. Seemed like a good idea at the time. You can probably tell I've not done very much drafting.

friarsol wrote:I'm pretty sure we don't specify which is Large and which is Small, but we do order when the sets come out in the block, which might do the trick just as easily.
Yeah, there's no indication of set size right now, but I've gotten around that by considering all sets under 200 cards "small". Although I do like the chronological order idea, so I'm going to use that instead.
friarsol wrote:Personally, I'd much rather only see the following arrangement for the typical three block set, as it represents the three stages of a blocks lifecycle:
1-1-1
1-1-2
1-2-3
(I guess technically it should be the reverse these days, since you draft the most recently released set first to make the newer cards more meaningful for your deck.)
That would work great, actually. Keeps things simple to code and fun to draft. Can always switch things up later if need be.
Chris H. wrote:Could you add a few sentences to the changes.txt document describing what you have accomplished?
I shall once I've got everything completed so that I know exactly what's going in. It's the last thing on my check list.
