Page 45 of 487

Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)

PostPosted: 26 Sep 2012, 15:38
by Sloth
mark wrote:The card Cruel Revival cannot be played if there is no zombie card in the graveyard.
Fixed! Thanks mark.

PowerClaws wrote:latest snapshot, the filter boxes in the editor dont work, typing anything then pressing enter does nothing for me

edit: changing the set/format enables the boxes but both act as without (i think)
I made an attempt to fix this. Please try again in the next beta. If it is not working, post exactly what you typed and which fields were checked.

PowerClaws wrote:Lim-Dul the Necromancer's effect doesnt add zombie as a creature type

(Whenever a creature an opponent controls is put into a graveyard from the battlefield, you may pay 1 B. If you do, return that card to the battlefield under your control. If it's a creature, it's a Zombie in addition to its other creature types.
1 B: Regenerate target Zombie.)
Fixed! Thanks PowerClaws.

Almeida wrote:Curse of Misfortunes not working
It works for me. Which version are you using?

Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)

PostPosted: 27 Sep 2012, 05:38
by Almeida
Sloth wrote:
mark wrote:The card Cruel Revival cannot be played if there is no zombie card in the graveyard.
Fixed! Thanks mark.

PowerClaws wrote:latest snapshot, the filter boxes in the editor dont work, typing anything then pressing enter does nothing for me

edit: changing the set/format enables the boxes but both act as without (i think)
I made an attempt to fix this. Please try again in the next beta. If it is not working, post exactly what you typed and which fields were checked.

PowerClaws wrote:Lim-Dul the Necromancer's effect doesnt add zombie as a creature type

(Whenever a creature an opponent controls is put into a graveyard from the battlefield, you may pay 1 B. If you do, return that card to the battlefield under your control. If it's a creature, it's a Zombie in addition to its other creature types.
1 B: Regenerate target Zombie.)
Fixed! Thanks PowerClaws.

Almeida wrote:Curse of Misfortunes not working
It works for me. Which version are you using?
1.2.15 snapshot

Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)

PostPosted: 27 Sep 2012, 07:09
by mark
AI had Razormane Masticore, I had Sanguine Guard and Deathgreeter on the battlefield.
In AI's draw step 3 damage were assigned to Sanguine Guard, which I regenerated in response. Then suddenly Deathgreeter was put into my graveyard and without any notice.
(The target id was correct though: SG had id 86 and DG had 67, RM targeted 86)

Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)

PostPosted: 27 Sep 2012, 07:52
by mark
AI attacked with Phantasmal Bear, I blocked with two Deathgreeter. Both died but Deathgreeter's effect was triggered only once.

Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)

PostPosted: 27 Sep 2012, 11:12
by moomarc
mark wrote:AI had Razormane Masticore, I had Sanguine Guard and Deathgreeter on the battlefield.
In AI's draw step 3 damage were assigned to Sanguine Guard, which I regenerated in response. Then suddenly Deathgreeter was put into my graveyard and without any notice.
(The target id was correct though: SG had id 86 and DG had 67, RM targeted 86)
I can confirm that there's definitely something wierd here. Tested further with AI controlling Razormane Masticore and me controlling 2 regenerating creatures. When the trigger targets one of them activate both creatures' regeneration. Resolve the stack and no creatures are tapped and both creatures have their regen shields in tact.

Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)

PostPosted: 27 Sep 2012, 12:31
by PowerClaws
Sloth wrote:
PowerClaws wrote:latest snapshot, the filter boxes in the editor dont work, typing anything then pressing enter does nothing for me

edit: changing the set/format enables the boxes but both act as without (i think)
I made an attempt to fix this. Please try again in the next beta. If it is not working, post exactly what you typed and which fields were checked.
It looks like the deck editor is working again, Thanks

Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)

PostPosted: 28 Sep 2012, 23:25
by Jaedayr
9/22 snapshot

AI cast Followed Footsteps on my Noxious Hatchling which had 3 -1/-1 counters on it. The next turn, AI got a token with 0 -1/-1 counters on it.

Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)

PostPosted: 29 Sep 2012, 14:56
by PowerClaws
The card Consuming Vapors has the text "target opponent sacrifices a creature" but still allows me to choose myself as it should

Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)

PostPosted: 29 Sep 2012, 18:14
by Sloth
Jaedayr wrote:9/22 snapshot

AI cast Followed Footsteps on my Noxious Hatchling which had 3 -1/-1 counters on it. The next turn, AI got a token with 0 -1/-1 counters on it.
Rule 706.2 states Counters on permanents are not copied.

PowerClaws wrote:The card Consuming Vapors has the text "target opponent sacrifices a creature" but still allows me to choose myself as it should
Fixed! Thanks PowerClaws.

Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)

PostPosted: 29 Sep 2012, 18:20
by friarsol
Sloth wrote:
Jaedayr wrote:9/22 snapshot

AI cast Followed Footsteps on my Noxious Hatchling which had 3 -1/-1 counters on it. The next turn, AI got a token with 0 -1/-1 counters on it.
Rule 706.2 states Counters on permanents are not copied.
I think he is saying the etb ability of the hatchling isn't copied

Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)

PostPosted: 30 Sep 2012, 11:28
by PowerClaws
Something seems to be occurring with casting spells and activating a signet twice, when i cast a spell (5CMC) the first activation adds the correct mana to the mana pool, but the second activation both adds the mana to the mana pool AND reduces the mana required to cast the spell by 2

Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)

PostPosted: 30 Sep 2012, 11:45
by moomarc
PowerClaws wrote:Something seems to be occurring with casting spells and activating a signet twice, when i cast a spell (5CMC) the first activation adds the correct mana to the mana pool, but the second activation both adds the mana to the mana pool AND reduces the mana required to cast the spell by 2
Which signet are you using? The only signets are the old Ravnica signets and they have nothing to do with cost cutting. If it is those, what are you using to untap them to activate them again for the same cost? :?

Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)

PostPosted: 30 Sep 2012, 11:48
by PowerClaws
moomarc wrote:
PowerClaws wrote:Something seems to be occurring with casting spells and activating a signet twice, when i cast a spell (5CMC) the first activation adds the correct mana to the mana pool, but the second activation both adds the mana to the mana pool AND reduces the mana required to cast the spell by 2
Which signet are you using? The only signets are the old Ravnica signets and they have nothing to do with cost cutting. If it is those, what are you using to untap them to activate them again for the same cost? :?
using two orzhov signets, the first signets adds the mana, the other (i think) add two to both the mana pool and to the cast, it ONLY occurs if you do it while paying the cost for a spell

Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)

PostPosted: 30 Sep 2012, 15:03
by ArsenalNut
PowerClaws wrote:
moomarc wrote:
PowerClaws wrote:Something seems to be occurring with casting spells and activating a signet twice, when i cast a spell (5CMC) the first activation adds the correct mana to the mana pool, but the second activation both adds the mana to the mana pool AND reduces the mana required to cast the spell by 2
Which signet are you using? The only signets are the old Ravnica signets and they have nothing to do with cost cutting. If it is those, what are you using to untap them to activate them again for the same cost? :?
using two orzhov signets, the first signets adds the mana, the other (i think) add two to both the mana pool and to the cast, it ONLY occurs if you do it while paying the cost for a spell
I could not reproduce the problem. Here's how I tested.
1) Get 4 Scrublands and 2 Orzhov Signets in play
2) Cast Sorin, Lord of Innistrad
3) Select first signet to pay for Sorin
4) Tap a Scrubland to pay for signet mana ability, then a white and a black mana show up in the manapool.
5) Unchanged cost for Sorin is still displayed and select the other signet
6) Repeat step 4
Final state was 2 white mana and 2 black mana in the manapool and unchanged cost for Sorin.

Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)

PostPosted: 01 Oct 2012, 04:00
by PowerClaws
ArsenalNut wrote:I could not reproduce the problem. Here's how I tested.
1) Get 4 Scrublands and 2 Orzhov Signets in play
2) Cast Sorin, Lord of Innistrad
3) Select first signet to pay for Sorin
4) Tap a Scrubland to pay for signet mana ability, then a white and a black mana show up in the manapool.
5) Unchanged cost for Sorin is still displayed and select the other signet
6) Repeat step 4
Final state was 2 white mana and 2 black mana in the manapool and unchanged cost for Sorin.
I did this twice, once casting both signets using the lands, the other had one signet paid by the other signet, it occurred for the second case only