ETB Replacement
Alright, got a spouse-less weekend ahead of me so it's project time!
I'm thinking of turning our static ETB triggers into the proper ETB replacement effects they should be, mainly to interact correctly with eachother (and Essence of the Wild </ulterior motive>). I'd convert etbCounter and add a macro to eliminate quite a bit of boilerplate.
This would give the card a "Moved" replacement that replaces the card ETB'ing with resolving the ability in the referenced SVar and THEN ETB'ing.
I have run into a little problem,though. There seems to be some contradiction between gatherer and comprules which is sowing the foul seeds of doubt.
The problem is with Essence of the Wild (Or really, if any two copy effects try to replace a single event). The gatherer ruling states that a creature will enter the battlefield as a copy of EotW even if it's a cloner. Why would it do so if you chose to apply the cloners effect last?
I'm thinking of turning our static ETB triggers into the proper ETB replacement effects they should be, mainly to interact correctly with eachother (and Essence of the Wild </ulterior motive>). I'd convert etbCounter and add a macro to eliminate quite a bit of boilerplate.
- Code: Select all
K:ETBReplacement:<Type>:<SVarReference>
This would give the card a "Moved" replacement that replaces the card ETB'ing with resolving the ability in the referenced SVar and THEN ETB'ing.
I have run into a little problem,though. There seems to be some contradiction between gatherer and comprules which is sowing the foul seeds of doubt.
- Comprules | Open
- Gatherer Ruling | Open
The problem is with Essence of the Wild (Or really, if any two copy effects try to replace a single event). The gatherer ruling states that a creature will enter the battlefield as a copy of EotW even if it's a cloner. Why would it do so if you chose to apply the cloners effect last?