High Quality Resources for Collectible Card Games and Home of the CCGHQ Team
https://www.slightlymagic.net/forum/
https://www.slightlymagic.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=8895
Posted: 25 Sep 2013, 00:03This isn't implemented correctly, I'm winning games from Niv-Mizzet Firemind's triggered ability without doing 40 damage,If a player has been dealt 21 points of combat damage by a particular Commander during the game, that player loses a game.
Posted: 25 Sep 2013, 01:21Fixed. Thanks, sagephoenix.sagephoenix wrote:This isn't implemented correctly, I'm winning games from Niv-Mizzet Firemind's triggered ability without doing 40 damage,If a player has been dealt 21 points of combat damage by a particular Commander during the game, that player loses a game.
Posted: 25 Sep 2013, 01:50Thanks, no problem.swordshine wrote:Fixed. Thanks, sagephoenix.sagephoenix wrote:This isn't implemented correctly, I'm winning games from Niv-Mizzet Firemind's triggered ability without doing 40 damage,If a player has been dealt 21 points of combat damage by a particular Commander during the game, that player loses a game.
Posted: 25 Sep 2013, 08:27Posted: 25 Sep 2013, 11:01Posted: 26 Sep 2013, 16:20Posted: 26 Sep 2013, 16:37It's just a filter looking for Legendary Creatures. I'm not sure we have a way to filter by Rarity in the way that would be needed.sagephoenix wrote:Could we implement the Noble variant? http://www.noblemtg.com/
It's a lot like Commander.
I'm not sure exactly how the deck builder for commander is implemented? I noticed that when you switch over, it will only show cards eligible for the command zone. Is this a list/array/set that is updated whenever new cards are added, or is it taking the whole set of cards and ruling out all non-legendary cards, then ruling out anything from that set that are not creatures?
If it's the latter, then Noble will be more difficult to implement because it's parameters involve the lowest printed rarity.
The next issue is issues with the command zone.
1. Your Noble is face-down. This purpose isn't to have a 2/2 morph creature but rather information hiding.
2. When you noble is destroyed or exiled, it behaves normally and doesn't return to the command zone.
What are your guys thoughts on implementing this?
Posted: 26 Sep 2013, 17:15I actually had to contact the person who started the format about this. It is extremely awkward phrasing. I've even had people think it means how many times it has occurred at that rarity. Basically, if it was ever printed at common, it's a common, even if it was printed as a mythic rare at some other point.friarsol wrote:It's just a filter looking for Legendary Creatures. I'm not sure we have a way to filter by Rarity in the way that would be needed.Does lowest printed rarity mean more common or more rare? I could see arguments for either way.Ok, it looks like it means more common. That's definitely awkward phrasing to me.
It could certainly be added to the list of potential future variants, but I'd imagine it would need either a developer who is excited about the format, or a huge burst of popularity for that to happen.
Posted: 28 Sep 2013, 08:00Posted: 29 Sep 2013, 21:58I gotta hit the sack before a busy work week but what I've found is that the cause seems to be that the AI is failing to pay the full cost when it has been increased.I don't know how exactly the ComputerUtilMana.payManaCost function works but the DEBUG_MANA_PAYMENT output seems to indicate that the increased cost is ignored altogether in the test phase and decreased by 1 in the PROD phase. ComputerUtilMana.calculateManaCost returns the original cost in test and the correctly increased cost in PROD.Hellfish wrote:-Fix disappearing AI Commander.
Posted: 29 Sep 2013, 22:14Posted: 01 Oct 2013, 19:05Posted: 05 Oct 2013, 18:04
Posted: 27 Nov 2013, 04:21Posted: 23 Jun 2014, 08:19