Bug Reports XMage 1.4.21 SOFTWARE
by BetaSteward
Moderators: North, BetaSteward, noxx, jeffwadsworth, JayDi, TheElk801, LevelX, CCGHQ Admins
Re: Bug Reports XMage 1.4.21 SOFTWARE
by TripleNipple » 19 Feb 2017, 22:36
Catch//Release does not function properly. The process currently is that the Right Half (Release) resolves first, and then the Left Half (Catch) resolves second. This is incorrect. This documents that bug. You also can't cast both halves normally. There is no 3rd Fuse casting option.
- TripleNipple
- Posts: 8
- Joined: 08 Feb 2015, 03:01
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 0 time
Re: Catch//Release is bugged
by jeffwadsworth » 20 Feb 2017, 00:59
Where is the ruling on this example? As far as I know, the targets are chosen at the same time...thus you do not have control of the creature you are trying to sacrifice. The "Fuse" option shows up as "Untap it" for some reason, but it works.TripleNipple wrote:The card Catch//Release resolves Release first, and then Catch. This is incorrect. Catch is supposed to resolve first, so I can then sacrifice the permanent I gained control of from Catch to Release, but Release resolves first, so this isn't an option.
http://mtgsalvation.gamepedia.com/Fuse
- jeffwadsworth
- Super Tester Elite
- Posts: 1171
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 04:47
- Location: USA
- Has thanked: 287 times
- Been thanked: 69 times
Re: Bug Reports XMage 1.4.21 SOFTWARE
by ChewiTeb » 20 Feb 2017, 02:08
Duskmantle Seer trigger doesn't work (it goes to the stack but it doesn't give any cards). Tested in Momir mode.
Re: Catch//Release is bugged
by Doctor Weird » 20 Feb 2017, 05:42
I'm not the one who reported it, but I do seem to remember a similar situation with another bug report a while back. Release does not involve any targeting, the players choose and sacrifice their permanents as part of the spell's resolution, and since a card always resolves in the order it's written, the Catch half goes first (Rule 702.101d, left halves go first), meaning that by the time the Release half comes, the targeted creature from the first half has already switched sides as part of the resolution currently going on.jeffwadsworth wrote:Where is the ruling on this example? As far as I know, the targets are chosen at the same time...thus you do not have control of the creature you are trying to sacrifice. The "Fuse" option shows up as "Untap it" for some reason, but it works.
http://mtgsalvation.gamepedia.com/Fuse
The Gatherer page for Catch//Release actually says this, now that I checked:
Gatherer wrote:4/15/2013 If you cast Catch/Release as a fused split spell, you can sacrifice the permanent you just gained control of.
- Doctor Weird
- Posts: 180
- Joined: 25 May 2015, 01:33
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 52 times
Re: Bug Reports XMage 1.4.21 SOFTWARE
by DiMiaN » 20 Feb 2017, 07:41
Having Blood Moon and Wooded Foothills on board and opponent removes Blood Moon. Couldn't crack Wooded Foothills after Blood Moon was gone.
Re: Catch//Release is bugged
by TripleNipple » 21 Feb 2017, 05:18
I went to the link you left, and it saidjeffwadsworth wrote:
Where is the ruling on this example? As far as I know, the targets are chosen at the same time...thus you do not have control of the creature you are trying to sacrifice. The "Fuse" option shows up as "Untap it" for some reason, but it works.
http://mtgsalvation.gamepedia.com/Fuse
Therefore, Catch should resolve before Release. Xmage currently (as I documented at the top of page Eight) has Release resolve before Catch. Thanks for reading and commenting.Fuse Wiki wrote:702.101d As a fused split spell resolves, the controller of the spell follows the instructions of the left half and then follows the instructions of the right half.
- TripleNipple
- Posts: 8
- Joined: 08 Feb 2015, 03:01
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 0 time
Re: Bug Reports XMage 1.4.21 SOFTWARE
by Cryptic Bore » 21 Feb 2017, 10:51
In a game of EDH. I had lazav already a copy of another creature on the field and then cast Necromantic Selection it returned lazav as as the copy of the previous creature is this correct or should it not return lazav as plain old lazav.
_________________________________________________________________________________
Remember to click the thanks on posts that either help or that you like
Remember to click the thanks on posts that either help or that you like
- Cryptic Bore
- Posts: 30
- Joined: 16 Nov 2016, 04:59
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 0 time
Re: Bug Reports XMage 1.4.21 SOFTWARE
by DiMiaN » 21 Feb 2017, 14:47
I was using Tooth and Nail to put Mikaeus, the Unhallowed and Walking Ballista to battlefield. Walking Ballista comes to battlefield with 1/1(???) And has no +1/+1 counters on it.
This is the correct scenario:
Walking Ballista should come to battlefield with 0/0 and dies. Mikaeus, the Unhallowed brings it back to battlefield with a +1/+1 counter. And from there you can go infinitive loop.
This is the correct scenario:
Walking Ballista should come to battlefield with 0/0 and dies. Mikaeus, the Unhallowed brings it back to battlefield with a +1/+1 counter. And from there you can go infinitive loop.
Re: Catch//Release is bugged
by jeffwadsworth » 21 Feb 2017, 14:54
There is a ruling specifically on this point:TripleNipple wrote:I went to the link you left, and it saidjeffwadsworth wrote:
Where is the ruling on this example? As far as I know, the targets are chosen at the same time...thus you do not have control of the creature you are trying to sacrifice. The "Fuse" option shows up as "Untap it" for some reason, but it works.
http://mtgsalvation.gamepedia.com/FuseTherefore, Catch should resolve before Release. Xmage currently (as I documented at the top of page Eight) has Release resolve before Catch. Thanks for reading and commenting.Fuse Wiki wrote:702.101d As a fused split spell resolves, the controller of the spell follows the instructions of the left half and then follows the instructions of the right half.
If you cast Catch/Release as a fused split spell, you can sacrifice the permanent you just gained control of.
So you are correct. The problem I had with it was targeting. Choosing targets must be done before resolution, but apparently that doesn't matter in this case.
http://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/ ... eid=368982
Last edited by jeffwadsworth on 21 Feb 2017, 15:50, edited 2 times in total.
- jeffwadsworth
- Super Tester Elite
- Posts: 1171
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 04:47
- Location: USA
- Has thanked: 287 times
- Been thanked: 69 times
Re: Bug Reports XMage 1.4.21 SOFTWARE
by rigeld2 » 21 Feb 2017, 15:34
Incorrect. Mikaeus gives Ballista +1/+1 as a static ability, so this interaction is working correctly.DiMiaN wrote:I was using Tooth and Nail to put Mikaeus, the Unhallowed and Walking Ballista to battlefield. Walking Ballista comes to battlefield with 1/1(???) And has no +1/+1 counters on it.
This is the correct scenario:
Walking Ballista should come to battlefield with 0/0 and dies. Mikaeus, the Unhallowed brings it back to battlefield with a +1/+1 counter. And from there you can go infinitive loop.
Ballista doesn't loop with Mikaeus like Triskelion does.
Re: Bug Reports XMage 1.4.21 SOFTWARE
by DiMiaN » 21 Feb 2017, 16:19
Thank you so much for clarifying this rigeld2. I actually asked in MTG Judge IRC chat and they said its an infinitive loop. Alright, have to adjust my deck now
Re: Bug Reports XMage 1.4.21 SOFTWARE
by rigeld2 » 21 Feb 2017, 17:01
If you happen to have a sac outlet it can loop - put them on the field, sac Ballista, undying gets it back, shoot a counter, sac it, undying, repeat.
I was going through my turn quickly and declared attacker by clicking on the TKS and clicked the f9 button in the GUI. The TKS didn't actually tap until after I clicked the pass button. After a minute or two of waiting I noticed my clock was counting down.
Want any more information?
I was going through my turn quickly and declared attacker by clicking on the TKS and clicked the f9 button in the GUI. The TKS didn't actually tap until after I clicked the pass button. After a minute or two of waiting I noticed my clock was counting down.
Want any more information?
Re: Bug Reports XMage 1.4.21 SOFTWARE
by Cryptic Bore » 21 Feb 2017, 20:34
same thing also happens if lazav is another a creature and and stunt double tries to copy lazav its just vanila lazav not lazav as a copy of said creatureSnowOona wrote:I encountered this bug while playing an EDH game. I casted Stunt Double and tried to copy an Dimir Doppelganger which has previously copied Avacyn, Angel of Hope. The result was that the Stunt Double entered as plain Dimir Doppelganger and not Avacyn.
_________________________________________________________________________________
Remember to click the thanks on posts that either help or that you like
Remember to click the thanks on posts that either help or that you like
- Cryptic Bore
- Posts: 30
- Joined: 16 Nov 2016, 04:59
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 0 time
Re: Bug Reports XMage 1.4.21 SOFTWARE
by jeffwadsworth » 21 Feb 2017, 23:17
I fixed both. Next version of XMage will make it all good.Cryptic Bore wrote:same thing also happens if lazav is another a creature and and stunt double tries to copy lazav its just vanila lazav not lazav as a copy of said creatureSnowOona wrote:I encountered this bug while playing an EDH game. I casted Stunt Double and tried to copy an Dimir Doppelganger which has previously copied Avacyn, Angel of Hope. The result was that the Stunt Double entered as plain Dimir Doppelganger and not Avacyn.
- jeffwadsworth
- Super Tester Elite
- Posts: 1171
- Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 04:47
- Location: USA
- Has thanked: 287 times
- Been thanked: 69 times
Re: Bug Reports XMage 1.4.21 SOFTWARE
by Cryptic Bore » 22 Feb 2017, 17:31
Awesomejeffwadsworth wrote:
I fixed both. Next version of XMage will make it all good.
Another bug: People always say rollbacks are broken in EDH but i havnt seen bug reports posted on here. i could of missed them but one of the common occurrences is infinite turns where one player after a rollback gets to play out there turn but everyone elses is skipped through. giving the appearance of infinite turns even though the other turns are still happening each player but one cant interact on their own turns. I agreed to the roll back esp since it was just him and me and even asked my own to see if we can get it to occur again.
The game log is here: http://pastebin.com/Lw725wtU
Last edited by Cryptic Bore on 23 Feb 2017, 00:26, edited 1 time in total.
_________________________________________________________________________________
Remember to click the thanks on posts that either help or that you like
Remember to click the thanks on posts that either help or that you like
- Cryptic Bore
- Posts: 30
- Joined: 16 Nov 2016, 04:59
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 0 time
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 68 guests