It is currently 18 Sep 2018, 23:03
   
Text Size

Motion to ban: tittysprinkle

by BetaSteward

Moderators: LevelX, BetaSteward, North, escplan9, noxx, Aurum, fireshoes, jeffwadsworth, TheElk801, CCGHQ Admins

Motion to ban: tittysprinkle

Postby GiRaff3 » 30 Jan 2018, 06:16

Please, PLEASE. Review the chat logs on every server that the user tittysprinkle logs in to. He is extremely spiteful, rude, and ignorant to all other players he interacts with. He continually uses derogatory language after losses and belittles other XMage users on a regular basis. I believe that tittysprinkles is a detriment to the entire community and it would be negligent to NOT ban him/her.

I am more than happy to answer questions or provide screen shots of tittysprinkle' poor behavior.

Thank you.
Last edited by GiRaff3 on 05 Feb 2018, 22:56, edited 1 time in total.
GiRaff3
 
Posts: 7
Joined: 30 Jan 2018, 06:02
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Motion to ban: tittysprinkle

Postby GiRaff3 » 01 Feb 2018, 00:20

57 views and not a single response? Yucky. I was hoping at least someone encountered him and can share their experience.
GiRaff3
 
Posts: 7
Joined: 30 Jan 2018, 06:02
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Motion to ban: tittysprinkle

Postby warum » 01 Feb 2018, 22:05

Then what? He'll just create another account.
warum
 
Posts: 51
Joined: 09 Dec 2013, 13:39
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Motion to ban: tittysprinkle

Postby GiRaff3 » 02 Feb 2018, 01:34

Depends on the nature of how bannings are executed: username, IP, ISP?
GiRaff3
 
Posts: 7
Joined: 30 Jan 2018, 06:02
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Motion to ban: tittysprinkle

Postby warum » 02 Feb 2018, 02:01

GiRaff3 wrote:Depends on the nature of how bannings are executed: username, IP, ISP?
IP bans are reckless and unreliable. Most people have dynamic IP.
warum
 
Posts: 51
Joined: 09 Dec 2013, 13:39
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Motion to ban: tittysprinkle

Postby GiRaff3 » 02 Feb 2018, 04:21

Internally, yes. The IP assigned to their router from their ISP, that can be static.
GiRaff3
 
Posts: 7
Joined: 30 Jan 2018, 06:02
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Motion to ban: tittysprinkle

Postby warum » 02 Feb 2018, 16:52

GiRaff3 wrote:Internally, yes. The IP assigned to their router from their ISP, that can be static.
And that's reckless. What if they're sitting on an dorm-wide connection? Now all of the dorm is banned.
warum
 
Posts: 51
Joined: 09 Dec 2013, 13:39
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Motion to ban: tittysprinkle

Postby GiRaff3 » 03 Feb 2018, 16:19

Someone like tittysprinkle is living in his parent's basement, we aren't going to have to worry about a "dorm."
GiRaff3
 
Posts: 7
Joined: 30 Jan 2018, 06:02
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Motion to ban: tittysprinkle

Postby warum » 04 Feb 2018, 05:40

GiRaff3 wrote:Someone like tittysprinkle is living in his parent's basement, we aren't going to have to worry about a "dorm."
You seem quite spiteful, rude, and ignorant. Are you tittysprinkle?
warum
 
Posts: 51
Joined: 09 Dec 2013, 13:39
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Motion to ban: tittysprinkle

Postby GiRaff3 » 05 Feb 2018, 22:56

That's awfully hurtful. My comment was based off of observation from several interactions with tittysprinkle. Your comment wasn't necessary and your remarks are baseless.

If you do not have the authority to address my concern, then please do not comment any further.

Thanks.
GiRaff3
 
Posts: 7
Joined: 30 Jan 2018, 06:02
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Motion to ban: tittysprinkle

Postby warum » 06 Feb 2018, 00:52

GiRaff3 wrote:your remarks are baseless
Your whole vendetta against this "tittysprinkle" seems rather spiteful.

You're saying rude things about this person.

You're saying that an IP or ISP-wide ban is perfectly fine, which is ignorant.
warum
 
Posts: 51
Joined: 09 Dec 2013, 13:39
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Motion to ban: tittysprinkle

Postby GiRaff3 » 13 Feb 2018, 19:15

GiRaff3 wrote:If you do not have the authority to address my concern, then please do not comment any further.

Thanks.
.
GiRaff3
 
Posts: 7
Joined: 30 Jan 2018, 06:02
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time


Return to XMage

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Feedfetcher and 10 guests


Who is online

In total there are 11 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 10 guests (based on users active over the past 10 minutes)
Most users ever online was 279 on 11 Jul 2013, 22:03

Users browsing this forum: Google Feedfetcher and 10 guests

Login Form