Collectible Card Game Headquarters

Please, PLEASE. Review the chat logs on every server that the user tittysprinkle logs in to. He is extremely spiteful, rude, and ignorant to all other players he interacts with. He continually uses derogatory language after losses and belittles other XMage users on a regular basis. I believe that tittysprinkles is a detriment to the entire community and it would be negligent to NOT ban him/her.

I am more than happy to answer questions or provide screen shots of tittysprinkle' poor behavior.

Thank you.

57 views and not a single response? Yucky. I was hoping at least someone encountered him and can share their experience.

Then what? He'll just create another account.

Depends on the nature of how bannings are executed: username, IP, ISP?

GiRaff3 wrote:Depends on the nature of how bannings are executed: username, IP, ISP?

IP bans are reckless and unreliable. Most people have dynamic IP.

Internally, yes. The IP assigned to their router from their ISP, that can be static.

GiRaff3 wrote:Internally, yes. The IP assigned to their router from their ISP, that can be static.

And that's reckless. What if they're sitting on an dorm-wide connection? Now all of the dorm is banned.

Someone like tittysprinkle is living in his parent's basement, we aren't going to have to worry about a "dorm."

GiRaff3 wrote:Someone like tittysprinkle is living in his parent's basement, we aren't going to have to worry about a "dorm."

You seem quite spiteful, rude, and ignorant. Are you tittysprinkle?

That's awfully hurtful. My comment was based off of observation from several interactions with tittysprinkle. Your comment wasn't necessary and your remarks are baseless.

If you do not have the authority to address my concern, then please do not comment any further.

Thanks.

GiRaff3 wrote:your remarks are baseless

Your whole vendetta against this "tittysprinkle" seems rather spiteful.

You're saying rude things about this person.

You're saying that an IP or ISP-wide ban is perfectly fine, which is ignorant.

GiRaff3 wrote:If you do not have the authority to address my concern, then please do not comment any further.

Thanks.

.