Motion to ban: tittysprinkle
by BetaSteward
Moderators: North, BetaSteward, noxx, jeffwadsworth, JayDi, TheElk801, LevelX, CCGHQ Admins
Motion to ban: tittysprinkle
by GiRaff3 » 30 Jan 2018, 06:16
Please, PLEASE. Review the chat logs on every server that the user tittysprinkle logs in to. He is extremely spiteful, rude, and ignorant to all other players he interacts with. He continually uses derogatory language after losses and belittles other XMage users on a regular basis. I believe that tittysprinkles is a detriment to the entire community and it would be negligent to NOT ban him/her.
I am more than happy to answer questions or provide screen shots of tittysprinkle' poor behavior.
Thank you.
I am more than happy to answer questions or provide screen shots of tittysprinkle' poor behavior.
Thank you.
Last edited by GiRaff3 on 05 Feb 2018, 22:56, edited 1 time in total.
- GiRaff3
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 30 Jan 2018, 06:02
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 0 time
Re: Motion to ban: tittysprinkle
by GiRaff3 » 01 Feb 2018, 00:20
57 views and not a single response? Yucky. I was hoping at least someone encountered him and can share their experience.
- GiRaff3
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 30 Jan 2018, 06:02
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 0 time
Re: Motion to ban: tittysprinkle
by warum » 01 Feb 2018, 22:05
Then what? He'll just create another account.
Re: Motion to ban: tittysprinkle
by GiRaff3 » 02 Feb 2018, 01:34
Depends on the nature of how bannings are executed: username, IP, ISP?
- GiRaff3
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 30 Jan 2018, 06:02
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 0 time
Re: Motion to ban: tittysprinkle
by warum » 02 Feb 2018, 02:01
IP bans are reckless and unreliable. Most people have dynamic IP.GiRaff3 wrote:Depends on the nature of how bannings are executed: username, IP, ISP?
Re: Motion to ban: tittysprinkle
by GiRaff3 » 02 Feb 2018, 04:21
Internally, yes. The IP assigned to their router from their ISP, that can be static.
- GiRaff3
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 30 Jan 2018, 06:02
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 0 time
Re: Motion to ban: tittysprinkle
by warum » 02 Feb 2018, 16:52
And that's reckless. What if they're sitting on an dorm-wide connection? Now all of the dorm is banned.GiRaff3 wrote:Internally, yes. The IP assigned to their router from their ISP, that can be static.
Re: Motion to ban: tittysprinkle
by GiRaff3 » 03 Feb 2018, 16:19
Someone like tittysprinkle is living in his parent's basement, we aren't going to have to worry about a "dorm."
- GiRaff3
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 30 Jan 2018, 06:02
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 0 time
Re: Motion to ban: tittysprinkle
by warum » 04 Feb 2018, 05:40
You seem quite spiteful, rude, and ignorant. Are you tittysprinkle?GiRaff3 wrote:Someone like tittysprinkle is living in his parent's basement, we aren't going to have to worry about a "dorm."
Re: Motion to ban: tittysprinkle
by GiRaff3 » 05 Feb 2018, 22:56
That's awfully hurtful. My comment was based off of observation from several interactions with tittysprinkle. Your comment wasn't necessary and your remarks are baseless.
If you do not have the authority to address my concern, then please do not comment any further.
Thanks.
If you do not have the authority to address my concern, then please do not comment any further.
Thanks.
- GiRaff3
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 30 Jan 2018, 06:02
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 0 time
Re: Motion to ban: tittysprinkle
by warum » 06 Feb 2018, 00:52
Your whole vendetta against this "tittysprinkle" seems rather spiteful.GiRaff3 wrote:your remarks are baseless
You're saying rude things about this person.
You're saying that an IP or ISP-wide ban is perfectly fine, which is ignorant.
Re: Motion to ban: tittysprinkle
by GiRaff3 » 13 Feb 2018, 19:15
.GiRaff3 wrote:If you do not have the authority to address my concern, then please do not comment any further.
Thanks.
- GiRaff3
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 30 Jan 2018, 06:02
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 0 time
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 138 guests