Feedback / Suggestions
by BetaSteward
Moderators: TheElk801, BetaSteward, LevelX, North, JayDi, noxx, jeffwadsworth, CCGHQ Admins
Re: Feedback / Suggestions
by cheddarsuave » 16 Mar 2019, 08:28
For the Booster Draft Elimination (Rich Man) format, the packs aren't randomized if there are fewer than 36 sets selected. They just go down in order from most recent to oldest, with no option to randomize.
I feel like the default behavior should be to randomize the sets even if there are fewer than 36 selected, or at least have that option.
I feel like the default behavior should be to randomize the sets even if there are fewer than 36 selected, or at least have that option.
- cheddarsuave
- Posts: 174
- Joined: 12 Sep 2016, 00:18
- Has thanked: 86 times
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: Feedback / Suggestions
by cheddarsuave » 21 Mar 2019, 12:56
Please add the option to adjust the starting life total for "freeform" type formats.
- cheddarsuave
- Posts: 174
- Joined: 12 Sep 2016, 00:18
- Has thanked: 86 times
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: Feedback / Suggestions
by Gottschkopf » 03 Apr 2019, 19:02
Could you please readd the old "partial Paris" Mulligan for Commander? The new ones are completely braindead and render more complicated decks unplayable...
- Gottschkopf
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 19 Oct 2017, 15:28
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 0 time
Re: Feedback / Suggestions
by JayDi » 03 Apr 2019, 19:33
Old mulligan is "game default" (Vancouver).Gottschkopf wrote:Could you please readd the old "partial Paris" Mulligan for Commander? The new ones are completely braindead and render more complicated decks unplayable...
-
JayDi - Posts: 324
- Joined: 23 Nov 2017, 15:41
- Location: Russia
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 48 times
Re: Feedback / Suggestions
by Gottschkopf » 03 Apr 2019, 20:41
- Gottschkopf
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 19 Oct 2017, 15:28
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 0 time
Re: Feedback / Suggestions
by JayDi » 03 Apr 2019, 20:56
Yes, it's can be added. I've created issue on github to monitor that feature.
-
JayDi - Posts: 324
- Joined: 23 Nov 2017, 15:41
- Location: Russia
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 48 times
Re: Feedback / Suggestions
by tuberov » 11 Apr 2019, 02:24
Would it be possible to add a filter to the top of the games, or at least a notifier, of what the mulligan rules are for which game so players know joining in?
Re: Feedback / Suggestions
by illuknisaa » 16 Apr 2019, 13:36
Why can't the ignore list be bigger? There are way too many asshats who can't behave and the ignore list slots are too few. People can also make multiple accounts. I once had to ignore a guy 5+ times before he would stop.
- illuknisaa
- Posts: 112
- Joined: 20 Apr 2017, 20:11
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: Feedback / Suggestions
by Ocliente » 24 Apr 2019, 12:57
It's common while creating edh games where you use descriptions as Casual, No combo, No land destruction. And people use that to bring busted combo decks and win over casual decks, just to feel good cause can't win otherwise.
So, it would be very good if there is a too for kicking someone out of the table, it could be a vote where if 3 out of 4 people agree, someone is kick it out. It would be really good, useful, and save time for people. <3
So, it would be very good if there is a too for kicking someone out of the table, it could be a vote where if 3 out of 4 people agree, someone is kick it out. It would be really good, useful, and save time for people. <3
- Ocliente
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 24 Apr 2019, 12:53
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 0 time
Re: Feedback / Suggestions
by Grahf » 29 Apr 2019, 14:08
Why is xmage so laggish. Sometimes are matches completely unplayable. Bad engine, or what? I am sorry, but this problem still persists. It is possible to do something about it?
Re: Feedback / Suggestions
by JayDi » 30 Apr 2019, 08:57
It's a network engine limitations -- xmage needs to sends updates to players before continue (even if player is inactive and can't do anything). That's why laggy user can ruin match for all other users. Real command ping = sum of all users pings.Grahf wrote:Why is xmage so laggish. Sometimes are matches completely unplayable. Bad engine, or what? I am sorry, but this problem still persists. It is possible to do something about it?
-
JayDi - Posts: 324
- Joined: 23 Nov 2017, 15:41
- Location: Russia
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 48 times
Re: Feedback / Suggestions
by Lord0fHam » 22 Jun 2019, 07:35
Can we please get roll back to the beginning of the current step? I accidentally clicked done before declaring attackers.
- Lord0fHam
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 15 Mar 2015, 02:55
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 0 time
Re: Feedback / Suggestions
by copperfield » 27 Jun 2019, 01:17
I have the following suggestions
1)I would like some more keybind option, whenever a question pop up each option to be associate to a key, and not just one of them to F2, like for example yes/done=1, no/undo=2 and whatever else to 3 and so on.
2)A way to say "yes" or "no" to some or all of the trigger of a particular card. Maybe by grouping them as a block and putting them in the stack with whatever option already selected or when in the stack selecting multiples and marking the option for all of them, or both.
For example: I have 7+ creatures, I play Beastmaster Ascention and attack, I don't want to lose time clicking yes to it 7+ times, each time I attack.
2.1)Speaking of quest cards, cards like those get very annoying with all the asking for their triggers, because after the condition is fulfilled the rest of the trigger are just annoying, so perhaps add to them a way to pre-select the option of the triggers (or just stop triggering)
1)I would like some more keybind option, whenever a question pop up each option to be associate to a key, and not just one of them to F2, like for example yes/done=1, no/undo=2 and whatever else to 3 and so on.
2)A way to say "yes" or "no" to some or all of the trigger of a particular card. Maybe by grouping them as a block and putting them in the stack with whatever option already selected or when in the stack selecting multiples and marking the option for all of them, or both.
For example: I have 7+ creatures, I play Beastmaster Ascention and attack, I don't want to lose time clicking yes to it 7+ times, each time I attack.
2.1)Speaking of quest cards, cards like those get very annoying with all the asking for their triggers, because after the condition is fulfilled the rest of the trigger are just annoying, so perhaps add to them a way to pre-select the option of the triggers (or just stop triggering)
-
copperfield - Posts: 29
- Joined: 21 Aug 2018, 13:24
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Feedback / Suggestions
by duelcastermage » 30 Dec 2019, 20:13
Would love it if XMage didn't immediately show my opponent a spell I accidentally clicked on, only for me to have to cancel.
That free information has cost me countless games on the interface. Why not just show the opponent the spell AFTER I fully pay the costs for it??
That free information has cost me countless games on the interface. Why not just show the opponent the spell AFTER I fully pay the costs for it??
- duelcastermage
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 26 Dec 2019, 08:06
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 0 time
Re: Feedback / Suggestions
by duelcastermage » 07 Feb 2020, 11:09
Would love a Team Draft option, either 4v4, 3v3, 2v2, etc. With the ability to choose who is on which team.
If this isn't possible, it would be nice to be able to determine seating around the table by order of when each player joins. That way we could do a makeshift team draft by playing private limited matches after the draft portion ends.
Thanks!
If this isn't possible, it would be nice to be able to determine seating around the table by order of when each player joins. That way we could do a makeshift team draft by playing private limited matches after the draft portion ends.
Thanks!
- duelcastermage
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 26 Dec 2019, 08:06
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 0 time
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests