[confirm]Assign combat damage as it weren't blocked issues
Posted: 14 Aug 2017, 10:34
Describe the Bug:
I couldn't find any info on our forums so I don't know if this is a deliberate trick or a bug:
If a player has a card with ability like Rhox "assign its combat damage as though it weren't blocked" and the crature isn't blocked everything seems fine.However if Rhox is blocked but you choose to use it's ability the damage isn't assigned to blocker but it shows as assigned to Rhox's owner not opponent.The damage is correctly made to opponent but it is quite confusing when you want to prevent the damage and you have to select the damage card on opponent.
Which card did behave improperly?
"assign its combat damage as though it weren't blocked" ability
Which update are you using? (date, name)Which type? (duel, gauntlet, sealed deck)
Manalink 2016/08/27: Eldritch Moon v2, duel
What exactly should be the correct behavior/interaction?
A creature with this ability if blocked the damage is still shown on opponent not owner.
Are any other cards possibly affected by this bug?
-
I couldn't find any info on our forums so I don't know if this is a deliberate trick or a bug:
If a player has a card with ability like Rhox "assign its combat damage as though it weren't blocked" and the crature isn't blocked everything seems fine.However if Rhox is blocked but you choose to use it's ability the damage isn't assigned to blocker but it shows as assigned to Rhox's owner not opponent.The damage is correctly made to opponent but it is quite confusing when you want to prevent the damage and you have to select the damage card on opponent.
Which card did behave improperly?
"assign its combat damage as though it weren't blocked" ability
Which update are you using? (date, name)Which type? (duel, gauntlet, sealed deck)
Manalink 2016/08/27: Eldritch Moon v2, duel
What exactly should be the correct behavior/interaction?
A creature with this ability if blocked the damage is still shown on opponent not owner.
Are any other cards possibly affected by this bug?
-