It is currently 25 Aug 2025, 13:49
   
Text Size

Feature Requests Thread

Moderators: timmermac, Blacksmith, KrazyTheFox, Agetian, friarsol, CCGHQ Admins

Re: Separate Content from Application

Postby sagephoenix » 19 Nov 2011, 22:43

Hellfish wrote:
sagephoenix wrote:
Tranberry wrote:I would suggest a new folder structure that aims to separate user content (deck-files, card images, maybe preferences) from application/developer files (jar-files, py-files etc)

I believe it would make it easier to keep settings and decks without the need to make backups while testing new daily-snapshots. And it might also solv the card-images problem where users accidently delete and/or download a whole new set of images.
Speaking of which, I've been wondering for a while, how do the snapshots even work and where do I find them?
http://cardforge.org/releases/snapshots/forge/forge/
Then what?

http://i42.tinypic.com/359ixl2.jpg
sagephoenix
 
Posts: 177
Joined: 29 Aug 2011, 14:07
Has thanked: 57 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Feature Requests Thread

Postby timmermac » 19 Nov 2011, 23:02

Click on the newest one with .tar.bz2 at the end. If you're on a Mac, it should have osx.tar.bz2 at the end. The newest are towards the bottom of the list.
"I just woke up, haven't had coffee, let alone a pee in 7 days, and I find out you stole my ass and made a ...mini-me! Carter, I should be irked currently, yes?" - Jack O'Neill
User avatar
timmermac
Tester
 
Posts: 1512
Joined: 17 May 2010, 20:36
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 95 times

Re: Feature Requests Thread

Postby squee1968 » 25 Nov 2011, 20:01

I don't know if this has been requested before, or something similar is planned in doublestrike's new UI, but as of the latest beta (1.18), there is a new ability to always accept optional effects by right clicking while it's on the stack. My suggestion is to make it so that the right click acts like an enter command so one can go through the phases (or enter on pop-up windows, etc.) a lot quicker. You could maybe replace the optional effects with maybe a single left click directly on the ability on the stack to always say "no" to the optional effect and a double left click to say "yes". Or maybe some sort of pop-up with a check-box.
A second request is to make the mana pool more functional. What I mean is that I would like to have the ability to click on a single symbol to pay costs. For example, if i have 2 white mana and 4 green mana in my pool, if i play a spell, say worship for example, the computer will take both white and 2 green, but I would rather it take only 1 white. I'm sure there are workarounds for this, and i know there are pop-ups that ask which mana to pay at certain times, but imho they aren't enough. There are times when I can't add only 1 of a color (white in the example) at a time, like when I use wooded bastion, for example.
Perhaps if the mana pool was in a fixed position (like next to your life total), there could be just a colored circle with the number of mana of that color inside, and the computer would always make you pay colored mana first, one symbol at a time, then whatever was left could be paid with colored mana or colorless.
Anyhoo, think about it, and thank you for a wonderful program.
squee1968
 
Posts: 254
Joined: 18 Nov 2011, 03:28
Has thanked: 110 times
Been thanked: 45 times

Re: Feature Requests Thread

Postby sagephoenix » 01 Dec 2011, 02:46

Can anyone guess how far off in the future multiple AI players (Free for All) would be?
sagephoenix
 
Posts: 177
Joined: 29 Aug 2011, 14:07
Has thanked: 57 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Feature Requests Thread

Postby PsiOptics » 04 Dec 2011, 00:07

I am not sure if it's been posted but it would be cool to see the picture of the card as its being played on the stack.

Even if you can't show the stack with overlapping pictures like MTGO, showing the last card picture played on the stack would be really nice.

It would be a nice compliment to the text play by play dialog and I would probably not skip as much and miss a play every now and than due to my impatience =)

Something seems to make it a bit more special by seeing Wrath of God as a picture on the stack for example.
PsiOptics
 
Posts: 42
Joined: 03 Oct 2011, 22:16
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Feature Requests Thread

Postby timmermac » 04 Dec 2011, 04:47

You can see that if you hover over entries on the stack with your mouse.
"I just woke up, haven't had coffee, let alone a pee in 7 days, and I find out you stole my ass and made a ...mini-me! Carter, I should be irked currently, yes?" - Jack O'Neill
User avatar
timmermac
Tester
 
Posts: 1512
Joined: 17 May 2010, 20:36
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 95 times

Re: Feature Requests Thread

Postby slapshot5 » 04 Dec 2011, 05:10

sagephoenix wrote:Can anyone guess how far off in the future multiple AI players (Free for All) would be?
My best guess would be "not in the next 12 months". And that's only a guess. If one of the developers gets *really* motivated, it could happen at any time.

-slapshot5
slapshot5
Programmer
 
Posts: 1391
Joined: 03 Jan 2010, 17:47
Location: Mac OS X
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 68 times

Re: Feature Requests Thread

Postby Accountancy » 04 Dec 2011, 10:48

Because of the size of my screen, when using the Quest mode deck editor, I can't see the bottom of the window and it isn't possible to maximize or resize, can someone change to code to allow some way to fix this?
Accountancy
 
Posts: 230
Joined: 14 Aug 2009, 12:39
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Feature Requests Thread

Postby slapshot5 » 04 Dec 2011, 13:48

Accountancy wrote:Because of the size of my screen, when using the Quest mode deck editor, I can't see the bottom of the window and it isn't possible to maximize or resize, can someone change to code to allow some way to fix this?
That should be a bug, not a feature request. Can you post this with a screenshot in the Current Known Bugs List topic?

-slapshot5
slapshot5
Programmer
 
Posts: 1391
Joined: 03 Jan 2010, 17:47
Location: Mac OS X
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 68 times

Re: Feature Requests Thread

Postby Chris H. » 04 Dec 2011, 15:25

Accountancy wrote:Because of the size of my screen, when using the Quest mode deck editor, I can't see the bottom of the window and it isn't possible to maximize or resize, can someone change to code to allow some way to fix this?
`
What is the resolution for your monitor?
User avatar
Chris H.
Forge Moderator
 
Posts: 6320
Joined: 04 Nov 2008, 12:11
Location: Mac OS X Yosemite
Has thanked: 644 times
Been thanked: 643 times

Re: Feature Requests Thread

Postby Nordos » 04 Dec 2011, 19:11

for me it happens with 1366 x 768 on a laptop.
Nordos
 
Posts: 558
Joined: 23 May 2011, 14:06
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 18 times

Re: Feature Requests Thread

Postby timmermac » 05 Dec 2011, 02:42

timmermac wrote:Is it possible to increase the randomization on which boosters are available in the Card Shop in quest mode? I'm finding that I can expect to see certain packs most times, and I'd kind of like the others to appear a bit more often. So far it seems like M10, M11, M12, Innistrad, Worldwake, Alara block and the 2nd Mirrodin block appear much more frequently than the others.
I'm going to renew my request here. At least give the user the option to determine how frequently certain boosters appear in the card shop. I'd prefer an even distribution.
"I just woke up, haven't had coffee, let alone a pee in 7 days, and I find out you stole my ass and made a ...mini-me! Carter, I should be irked currently, yes?" - Jack O'Neill
User avatar
timmermac
Tester
 
Posts: 1512
Joined: 17 May 2010, 20:36
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 95 times

Re: Feature Requests Thread

Postby friarsol » 05 Dec 2011, 03:09

timmermac wrote:
timmermac wrote:Is it possible to increase the randomization on which boosters are available in the Card Shop in quest mode? I'm finding that I can expect to see certain packs most times, and I'd kind of like the others to appear a bit more often. So far it seems like M10, M11, M12, Innistrad, Worldwake, Alara block and the 2nd Mirrodin block appear much more frequently than the others.
I'm going to renew my request here. At least give the user the option to determine how frequently certain boosters appear in the card shop. I'd prefer an even distribution.
The way the boosters are setup now was intentional. While I understand you wanting something different, there's not really as much focus in this area from the dev team here right now. Maybe when all these UI changes are done with the booster distribution can be looked at and improved.
friarsol
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 7593
Joined: 15 May 2010, 04:20
Has thanked: 243 times
Been thanked: 965 times

Re: Feature Requests Thread

Postby Accountancy » 06 Dec 2011, 07:27

Chris H. wrote:
Accountancy wrote:Because of the size of my screen, when using the Quest mode deck editor, I can't see the bottom of the window and it isn't possible to maximize or resize, can someone change to code to allow some way to fix this?
`
What is the resolution for your monitor?
Just as Nordos said, it's 1366X768.
I didn't post this in bugs as the window works fine, it just has no function to resize whereas most forge windows do, it's unfortunate that my screen is so short as I can't move the window up, stupid wide-arse-screen.
Accountancy
 
Posts: 230
Joined: 14 Aug 2009, 12:39
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Feature Requests Thread

Postby Accountancy » 06 Dec 2011, 07:29

On a different subject, would it be possible to make a draft option within forge itself so that I can do drafts with boosters from different sets? I'd love to do an Odyssey Onslaught Future Sight draft and it's a bit annoying to have to make a custom draft if I wanna use different boosters.
Accountancy
 
Posts: 230
Joined: 14 Aug 2009, 12:39
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 2 times

PreviousNext

Return to Forge

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 52 guests

Main Menu

User Menu

Our Partners


Who is online

In total there are 52 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 52 guests (based on users active over the past 10 minutes)
Most users ever online was 7303 on 15 Jul 2025, 20:46

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 52 guests

Login Form