It is currently 07 Jun 2025, 19:22
   
Text Size

Card Requests

Moderators: timmermac, Blacksmith, KrazyTheFox, Agetian, friarsol, CCGHQ Admins

Re: Card Requests

Postby moomarc » 09 Jan 2012, 04:57

Accountancy wrote:Not to press it, but now that we can track life loss for a turn, are Bloodchief Ascension and Wound Reflection doable?
Sloth did the hard work and added the LifeLostThisTurn feature and Children of Korlis last night and I added the rest of the cards that I culd see that use it. So we now also have Bloodchief Ascension, Luminarch Ascension, Wound Reflection, Tainted Sigil and Sygg, River Cutthroat. =D> check next daily build.
-Marc
User avatar
moomarc
Pixel Commander
 
Posts: 2091
Joined: 04 Jun 2010, 15:22
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 371 times
Been thanked: 372 times

Re: Card Requests

Postby Accountancy » 09 Jan 2012, 07:13

moomarc wrote:
Accountancy wrote:Not to press it, but now that we can track life loss for a turn, are Bloodchief Ascension and Wound Reflection doable?
Sloth did the hard work and added the LifeLostThisTurn feature and Children of Korlis last night and I added the rest of the cards that I culd see that use it. So we now also have Bloodchief Ascension, Luminarch Ascension, Wound Reflection, Tainted Sigil and Sygg, River Cutthroat. =D> check next daily build.
YAYAYAYAYAY! Thank you very much, I can't wait to abuse these cards!
Accountancy
 
Posts: 230
Joined: 14 Aug 2009, 12:39
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Card Requests

Postby Dramier » 14 Jan 2012, 05:30

I searched but didn't see anybody else post this, although I could have missed it. (I am very new to the forum.)

I scripted Urge To Feed and tested it last night. I had noticed people commenting on how it wasn't possible to script in the part about testing tapping any number of vampires. Strangely, I had no problems doing it? Unless I missed something, it's working flawlessly. I almost feel like there has to be something I didn't test, but who knows. Take a look:

Code: Select all
Name:Urge to Feed
ManaCost:B B
Types:Instant
Text:no text
A:SP$ Pump | Cost$ B B | ValidTgts$ Creature | TgtPrompt$ Select target creature | NumAtt$ -3 | NumDef$ -3 | SpellDescription$ Target creature gets -3/-3 until end of turn. | SubAbility$ SVar=DBTap
SVar:DBTap:DB$Tap | Cost$ B B | TargetMin$ 0 | TargetMax$ MaxTgts | TgtPrompt$ Choose any number of untapped vampires | ValidTgts$ Creature.Vampire | SpellDescription$ You may tap any number of untapped Vampire creatures you control.  If you do, put a +1/+1 counter on each of those Vampires. | SubAbility$ SVar=DBPump
SVar:DBPump:DB$Pump | Defined$ Targeted | NumAtt$ +1 | NumDef$ +1
SVar:MaxTgts:Count$Valid Creature.Vampire
SVar:RemAIDeck:True
SVar:Rarity:Uncommon
SVar:Picture:http://www.wizards.com/global/images/magic/general/ursapine.jpg
SetInfo:RAV|Rare|http://magiccards.info/scans/en/rav/188.jpg
Oracle:{G}: Target creature gets -3/-3 until end of turn.  You may tap any number of untapped Vampire creatures you control.  If you do, put a +1/+1 counter on each of those Vampires.
End
Of course you'll need to add the file in the correct place, add the correct JPEG's, etc.
Dramier
 
Posts: 1
Joined: 14 Jan 2012, 05:18
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Card Requests

Postby moomarc » 14 Jan 2012, 06:30

Dramier wrote:I searched but didn't see anybody else post this, although I could have missed it. (I am very new to the forum.)

I scripted Urge To Feed and tested it last night. I had noticed people commenting on how it wasn't possible to script in the part about testing tapping any number of vampires. Strangely, I had no problems doing it? Unless I missed something, it's working flawlessly. I almost feel like there has to be something I didn't test, but who knows. Take a look:

Code: Select all
Name:Urge to Feed
ManaCost:B B
Types:Instant
Text:no text
A:SP$ Pump | Cost$ B B | ValidTgts$ Creature | TgtPrompt$ Select target creature | NumAtt$ -3 | NumDef$ -3 | SpellDescription$ Target creature gets -3/-3 until end of turn. | SubAbility$ SVar=DBTap
SVar:DBTap:DB$Tap | Cost$ B B | TargetMin$ 0 | TargetMax$ MaxTgts | TgtPrompt$ Choose any number of untapped vampires | ValidTgts$ Creature.Vampire | SpellDescription$ You may tap any number of untapped Vampire creatures you control.  If you do, put a +1/+1 counter on each of those Vampires. | SubAbility$ SVar=DBPump
SVar:DBPump:DB$Pump | Defined$ Targeted | NumAtt$ +1 | NumDef$ +1
SVar:MaxTgts:Count$Valid Creature.Vampire
SVar:RemAIDeck:True
SVar:Rarity:Uncommon
SVar:Picture:http://www.wizards.com/global/images/magic/general/ursapine.jpg
SetInfo:RAV|Rare|http://magiccards.info/scans/en/rav/188.jpg
Oracle:{G}: Target creature gets -3/-3 until end of turn.  You may tap any number of untapped Vampire creatures you control.  If you do, put a +1/+1 counter on each of those Vampires.
End
Of course you'll need to add the file in the correct place, add the correct JPEG's, etc.
The problem with Urge to Feed these days is not targeting any number of vampires, its the 'if you do' clause. In your script if another spell taps one of your targets while Urge to Feed is still on the stack, that creature will still get a +1/+1 counter.
-Marc
User avatar
moomarc
Pixel Commander
 
Posts: 2091
Joined: 04 Jun 2010, 15:22
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 371 times
Been thanked: 372 times

Re: Card Requests

Postby randallross420 » 14 Jan 2012, 07:58

writing to request Protean Hulk, Windbrisk Heights, and Duplicant.
big ups
randallross420
 
Posts: 49
Joined: 24 Jun 2011, 00:46
Location: new orleans, LA
Has thanked: 23 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Card Requests

Postby friarsol » 14 Jan 2012, 14:22

moomarc wrote:
Dramier wrote:I searched but didn't see anybody else post this, although I could have missed it. (I am very new to the forum.)

I scripted Urge To Feed and tested it last night. I had noticed people commenting on how it wasn't possible to script in the part about testing tapping any number of vampires. Strangely, I had no problems doing it? Unless I missed something, it's working flawlessly. I almost feel like there has to be something I didn't test, but who knows. Take a look:

Code: Select all
Name:Urge to Feed
ManaCost:B B
Types:Instant
Text:no text
A:SP$ Pump | Cost$ B B | ValidTgts$ Creature | TgtPrompt$ Select target creature | NumAtt$ -3 | NumDef$ -3 | SpellDescription$ Target creature gets -3/-3 until end of turn. | SubAbility$ SVar=DBTap
SVar:DBTap:DB$Tap | Cost$ B B | TargetMin$ 0 | TargetMax$ MaxTgts | TgtPrompt$ Choose any number of untapped vampires | ValidTgts$ Creature.Vampire | SpellDescription$ You may tap any number of untapped Vampire creatures you control.  If you do, put a +1/+1 counter on each of those Vampires. | SubAbility$ SVar=DBPump
SVar:DBPump:DB$Pump | Defined$ Targeted | NumAtt$ +1 | NumDef$ +1
SVar:MaxTgts:Count$Valid Creature.Vampire
SVar:RemAIDeck:True
SVar:Rarity:Uncommon
SVar:Picture:http://www.wizards.com/global/images/magic/general/ursapine.jpg
SetInfo:RAV|Rare|http://magiccards.info/scans/en/rav/188.jpg
Oracle:{G}: Target creature gets -3/-3 until end of turn.  You may tap any number of untapped Vampire creatures you control.  If you do, put a +1/+1 counter on each of those Vampires.
End
Of course you'll need to add the file in the correct place, add the correct JPEG's, etc.
The problem with Urge to Feed these days is not targeting any number of vampires, its the 'if you do' clause. In your script if another spell taps one of your targets while Urge to Feed is still on the stack, that creature will still get a +1/+1 counter.
Well those Vampires aren't even targeted. It would really need "TapUpTo" like what Great Whale uses to Untap lands. If that existed, it would be pretty straightforward (since the tapping/remembering would happen during resolution).
friarsol
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 7593
Joined: 15 May 2010, 04:20
Has thanked: 243 times
Been thanked: 965 times

Re: Card Requests

Postby Accountancy » 15 Jan 2012, 03:04

Is there a chance of some Dark Ascension cards being implemented before the prerelease/launch party? I can't remember the usual practice for new sets, but I'd love to see Faithless Looting and Havengul Lich!
Accountancy
 
Posts: 230
Joined: 14 Aug 2009, 12:39
Has thanked: 22 times
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Card Requests

Postby ArsenalNut » 15 Jan 2012, 04:43

Accountancy wrote:Is there a chance of some Dark Ascension cards being implemented before the prerelease/launch party? I can't remember the usual practice for new sets, but I'd love to see Faithless Looting and Havengul Lich!
The set won't be put into a release until the image and oracle data is available. A script for Faithless Looting without this information is available in this thread http://www.slightlymagic.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=5804. Havengul Lich is not currently scriptable because copying abilities is not supported.
So many cards, so little time
User avatar
ArsenalNut
 
Posts: 512
Joined: 08 Jul 2011, 03:49
Has thanked: 27 times
Been thanked: 121 times

Re: Card Requests

Postby wilsonbiggs » 15 Jan 2012, 23:28

The Lorwyn Land Cycle (Windbrisk Heights, etc.)
wilsonbiggs
 
Posts: 4
Joined: 15 Jan 2012, 23:11
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Card Requests

Postby Doublestrike » 16 Jan 2012, 02:00

slapshot5 wrote:
sagephoenix wrote:Just so everyone knows, I am currently entertaining myself with an idea on how to make Chaos Orb and Falling Star possible to play in Forge. I've messed around with scripting some custom cards, and I basically get the general idea of it. Once I find a way to make it for certain possible in Forge, I'll see if any programmers want to help. =p
Care to share? I have given Chaos Orb some consideration recently. And I understand the new UI just enough to be dangerous.

-slapshot5
I'd have to admit, this problem (Chaos Orb) wasn't in mind during the design :P
---
A joke is a very serious thing.
User avatar
Doublestrike
UI Programmer
 
Posts: 715
Joined: 08 Aug 2011, 09:07
Location: Bali
Has thanked: 183 times
Been thanked: 161 times

Re: Card Requests

Postby AndyTron » 16 Jan 2012, 11:03

Is Eureka doable?
AndyTron
 
Posts: 53
Joined: 03 Feb 2011, 20:03
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Card Requests

Postby Iran » 18 Jan 2012, 23:00

Is Grafdigger's Cage from Dark Ascension will be doable?
I see a great combo with Undead Alchemist, and this card can be used in controls and millings (your opponent) decks too.

About Zedruu the Greathearted and Bazaar Trader. These will be doable?

I see a great combo with Ravenous Demon // Archdemon of Greed (Dark Ascension) and Bronze Bombshell.


Thanks
Iran
 
Posts: 251
Joined: 11 Jul 2011, 04:36
Has thanked: 61 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Card Requests

Postby delirimouse » 18 Jan 2012, 23:29

I'd love if Runic Repetition was added. It is a very key card in triple ISD draft for the Spider Spawning deck (allowing a crazy loop with Memory's Journey).

Forge isn't fantastic at drafting, but it is good at letting you practice picking up the pieces for this sort of bizarre deck and seeing how it plays, so it would help the utility a lot.
delirimouse
 
Posts: 39
Joined: 30 Aug 2011, 23:33
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Card Requests

Postby moomarc » 19 Jan 2012, 08:40

delirimouse wrote:I'd love if Runic Repetition was added. It is a very key card in triple ISD draft for the Spider Spawning deck (allowing a crazy loop with Memory's Journey).

Forge isn't fantastic at drafting, but it is good at letting you practice picking up the pieces for this sort of bizarre deck and seeing how it plays, so it would help the utility a lot.
It looks like Runic Repetition has been in since September. It has RemRandomDeck in its script though which is probably why it doesn't appear in draft. (RemRandomDeck is added by the devs to cards that are too specialised to appear in randomly generated decks although I'm not sure if they're meant to be removed from draft as well). You can just remove the line from the script in your local copy.
-Marc
User avatar
moomarc
Pixel Commander
 
Posts: 2091
Joined: 04 Jun 2010, 15:22
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 371 times
Been thanked: 372 times

Re: Card Requests

Postby friarsol » 19 Jan 2012, 13:14

I don't think the Draft is affected by RemRandomDeck, it should only be removed from Randomly Generated Decks.
friarsol
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 7593
Joined: 15 May 2010, 04:20
Has thanked: 243 times
Been thanked: 965 times

PreviousNext

Return to Forge

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests


Who is online

In total there are 49 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 49 guests (based on users active over the past 10 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4143 on 23 Jan 2024, 08:21

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests

Login Form