Bug hunters topic

[BAgate]

They can all be moved together, but since the posts are sorted by date there is no avoiding mixing them in with what is already there. But is that a big deal? The overlap would just be about the first page and a half of archived reports, and those haven't been checked yet anyway.

[Aswan jaguar]

I don't mind about the thing you say I am talking about: (we don't want Bug A with 3 answers to it to be splitted and the answers to it don't go with it but according to time so they are under other bugs/ and posts which were posted before,etc)I know that the above doesn't happen if we split 1 post at a time but split all posts together?

[BAgate]

OK, now I'm really confused. I'll just move all the contents from Pending to Archived and each thread will retain it's integrity (The threads will be sorted by the date of the last post within the thread but all replies will remain with the original post). We will just be moving them, not splitting them.

[BAgate]

Aswan Jaguar, do we really want the icon for unconfirmed to also mean needs attention for developers? Since we double check anything anyway, why don't we make exclamation point in a circle attention developers, while exclamation in triangle is attention bug hunters?

[Aswan jaguar]

The one in the circle is an - i - (international meaning INFO) not an - ! - this why we originally used in any case where extra info was needed.

The other is an "attention sign" that's why I have added that there as it is important for other Developers to see it (though Korath is very thorough to not forget things) but have things as a reminder ourselves is an extra safe policy.

[BAgate]

Huh. I must need my eyes checked.

I just have a problem with one icon meaning two different things when we have so many available (kind of defeats their purpose). So then how about the info being unconfirmed and the exclamation meaning attention developers?

[BAgate]

Damn, Korath is fast. I was working on a chunk of reports I was testing, and by the time I got around to moving the ones that were still bugged to bug reports he had already fixed half of them! We have some really good developers here.

And FYI, done with first 2 pages of Archived Reports, on to page 3...

[HarlequinCasts]

I just went through the pending pile and checked all of mine. Some were fixed and can be archived, some need to be pulled into the main forum as still bugged, and some like Korath just posted, are unchanged from v1 and can remain pending. (I'd do it myself if my moderator status ever happens )

[stassy]

Argh, still no mod status yet? Guess I will have to send another PM asap

[Aswan jaguar]

Huh. I must need my eyes checked.

I just have a problem with one icon meaning two different things when we have so many available (kind of defeats their purpose). So then how about the info being unconfirmed and the exclamation meaning attention developers?

I am fine with your suggestion go ahead and make the changes if others agree.(nobody replied so I guess they don't mind).

[BAgate]

Harlequin, took care of that for you.

[Aswan jaguar]

Bagate will you see which bugs are from V1 and move them now to archived reports section so we only V2 bugs there,please.

[BAgate]

They all were dated from before the release of v2, so I moved them all. So Pending Reports should be empty and waiting for new bugs.

[BAgate]

I'm done rechecking all the bugs from v1 except the scheme Surrender your Thoughts one (I don't play Archenemy so I have no idea what he is talking about). So if someone could check that on the 1st page of Archived Reports, that will be done.

And similarly, if someone could check the Reaper King bug on page 2...

[HarlequinCasts]

And similarly, if someone could check the Reaper King bug on page 2...

Aaarrrgh I hate messing with EDH stuff but I checked it! Looks like its still bugged btw. xD