Bug hunters topic
Report wrong Card behavior to get it fixed.
PLEASE ADD SAVEGAMES TO YOUR TOPIC !
PLEASE ADD SAVEGAMES TO YOUR TOPIC !
Moderators: BAgate, drool66, Aswan jaguar, gmzombie, stassy, CCGHQ Admins
Re: Bug hunters topic
by Korath » 18 Feb 2014, 13:42
I don't need to be credited in thread titles, btw, especially if it ends up truncating the title of the bug itself.
-
Korath - DEVELOPER
- Posts: 3708
- Joined: 02 Jun 2013, 05:57
- Has thanked: 496 times
- Been thanked: 1108 times
Re: Bug hunters topic
by Aswan jaguar » 18 Feb 2014, 13:57
The name to the title main purpose was to be able to tell which Developer worked on a bug and whoever (mainly another Developer) wanted to address a question about the cardcode a function or anything else could do that without having to read the bugs or maybe uncomprehensive code.
---
Trying to squash some bugs and playtesting.
Trying to squash some bugs and playtesting.
-
Aswan jaguar - Super Tester Elite
- Posts: 8131
- Joined: 13 May 2010, 12:17
- Has thanked: 748 times
- Been thanked: 479 times
Re: Bug hunters topic
by BAgate » 18 Feb 2014, 14:02
But hasn't that been superseded by the inclusion of the hashes?
And on that subject, the guidelines say that threads should be named with just the card name. So do the devs prefer that, or more description?
And on that subject, the guidelines say that threads should be named with just the card name. So do the devs prefer that, or more description?
Working on: housekeeping and archived reports
Re: Bug hunters topic
by Korath » 18 Feb 2014, 14:39
Best practice for naming bugs is to include enough information that someone who read the thread a year ago can identify it again from just the title, especially on search. "EDH still buggish after February patch" and "Disciple of the Vault" and "Disciple of the Vault" are useless. "EDH mulligan: cards stay exiled" and "Disciple of the Vault: error popup on first sac" and "Disciple of the Vault: legacy lasts too long" are much better.
Knowing who last worked on a card is useful, but A) there's better tools for that (git blame lets us see who last changed a particular line of code), and B) it's useful far less often than being able to see at a glance what the bug was.
Knowing who last worked on a card is useful, but A) there's better tools for that (git blame lets us see who last changed a particular line of code), and B) it's useful far less often than being able to see at a glance what the bug was.
-
Korath - DEVELOPER
- Posts: 3708
- Joined: 02 Jun 2013, 05:57
- Has thanked: 496 times
- Been thanked: 1108 times
Re: Bug hunters topic
by stassy » 18 Feb 2014, 16:37
So it's ok to do AJ's way then (infos on title)?
- stassy
- Moderator
- Posts: 5274
- Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 07:06
- Has thanked: 471 times
- Been thanked: 337 times
Re: Bug hunters topic
by Korath » 18 Feb 2014, 16:48
Ultimately, it's up to you guys. I'd mostly thought the point of "[Fixed by Korath]Help, help, nothing works" as opposed to "[Fixed]Help, help, nothing works" was to be an ego boost, which is the last thing I need.
-
Korath - DEVELOPER
- Posts: 3708
- Joined: 02 Jun 2013, 05:57
- Has thanked: 496 times
- Been thanked: 1108 times
Re: Bug hunters topic
by BAgate » 19 Feb 2014, 03:30
OK, we will update the guidelines and adjust accordingly.
Working on: housekeeping and archived reports
Re: Bug hunters topic
by BAgate » 19 Feb 2014, 04:11
V2 is out, so Pending Reports has been emptied again...
Working on: housekeeping and archived reports
Re: Bug hunters topic
by BAgate » 20 Feb 2014, 10:23
Finished checking the bugs fixed in v2, now back to page 3...
Working on: housekeeping and archived reports
Re: Bug hunters topic
by BAgate » 22 Feb 2014, 00:50
Done with page 3 except for one EDH bug I marked with a flame.
Working on: housekeeping and archived reports
Re: Bug hunters topic
by BAgate » 27 Feb 2014, 06:09
Done with page 4, on to 5...
Working on: housekeeping and archived reports
Re: Bug hunters topic
by Nexhro » 07 Mar 2014, 22:42
The problem with the new report thread title naming convention is that with longer card names it's hard to add any useful info.
For example: When I tried to rename the thread named '[confirmed]Wolfbitten Captive / Krallenhorde Killer', I couldn't even add the word 'transform'.
For example: When I tried to rename the thread named '[confirmed]Wolfbitten Captive / Krallenhorde Killer', I couldn't even add the word 'transform'.
-
Nexhro - Posts: 1613
- Joined: 23 Jan 2014, 18:08
- Location: HRO, UTC +1
- Has thanked: 78 times
- Been thanked: 103 times
Re: Bug hunters topic
by BAgate » 08 Mar 2014, 02:10
Two suggestions:
1) Don't add the name of the flipside, just use the name on the front of the card and then mention the name on the back in the body of the post (search will find it there).
2) additional info is helpful when doing searches but not vital. The name of the card and the status update are the most important things, so just do the best you can working around those. Unfortunately we can't change the max length on thread titles, so we just have to work with what we have.
1) Don't add the name of the flipside, just use the name on the front of the card and then mention the name on the back in the body of the post (search will find it there).
2) additional info is helpful when doing searches but not vital. The name of the card and the status update are the most important things, so just do the best you can working around those. Unfortunately we can't change the max length on thread titles, so we just have to work with what we have.
Working on: housekeeping and archived reports
Re: Bug hunters topic
by BAgate » 12 Mar 2014, 04:36
Done with 5, on to 6 (2.5 more to go).
Working on: housekeeping and archived reports
Re: Bug hunters topic
by BAgate » 15 Mar 2014, 21:41
Done checking all the fixed bugs in Archived Reports.
There are a few EDH bugs I didn't check that I marked with a flame, so if someone could check those. And double checking that I didn't miss any wouldn't hurt.
There are a few EDH bugs I didn't check that I marked with a flame, so if someone could check those. And double checking that I didn't miss any wouldn't hurt.
Working on: housekeeping and archived reports
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests