It is currently 27 Aug 2025, 18:46
   
Text Size

Downloaded today's snapshot, but...

Moderators: timmermac, Blacksmith, KrazyTheFox, Agetian, friarsol, CCGHQ Admins

Downloaded today's snapshot, but...

Postby timmermac » 29 Aug 2011, 02:32

...it appears to only be r9920, when according to WebSVN, it should be 1002x. Did I grab the wrong thing? It was http://cardforge.org/releases/snapshots/forge/forge/1.1.3-SNAPSHOT/forge-1.1.3-20110828.121256-10.tar.bz2 .
Last edited by Chris H. on 01 Sep 2011, 12:02, edited 2 times in total.
Reason: Added URL tags
"I just woke up, haven't had coffee, let alone a pee in 7 days, and I find out you stole my ass and made a ...mini-me! Carter, I should be irked currently, yes?" - Jack O'Neill
User avatar
timmermac
Tester
 
Posts: 1512
Joined: 17 May 2010, 20:36
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 95 times

Re: Downloaded today's snapshot, but...

Postby Chris H. » 29 Aug 2011, 12:20

timmermac wrote:...it appears to only be r9920, when according to WebSVN, it should be 1002x. Did I grab the wrong thing? It was http://cardforge.org/releases/snapshots/forge/forge/1.1.3-SNAPSHOT/forge-1.1.3-20110828.121256-10.tar.bz2 .
`
I got a 404 error when I clicked on the link that you provided. I can download the file by visiting http://cardforge.org/releases/snapshots/forge/forge/1.1.3-SNAPSHOT/ and clicking on the link from there. Strange.
User avatar
Chris H.
Forge Moderator
 
Posts: 6320
Joined: 04 Nov 2008, 12:11
Location: Mac OS X Yosemite
Has thanked: 644 times
Been thanked: 643 times

Re: Downloaded today's snapshot, but...

Postby Braids » 29 Aug 2011, 15:10

timmermac wrote:...it appears to only be r9920, when according to WebSVN, it should be 1002x. Did I grab the wrong thing? It was http://cardforge.org/releases/snapshots/forge/forge/1.1.3-SNAPSHOT/forge-1.1.3-20110828.121256-10.tar.bz2 .
@timmermac, there is a period at the end of your url. corrected form:
http://cardforge.org/releases/snapshots/forge/forge/1.1.3-SNAPSHOT/forge-1.1.3-20110828.121256-10.tar.bz2
"That is the dumbest thing I've ever seen." --Rob Cashwalker, regarding Innistrad double-sided cards. One of the first times he and I have ever agreed on something. ;)
User avatar
Braids
Programmer
 
Posts: 556
Joined: 22 Jun 2011, 00:39
Location: Unknown. Hobby: Driving myself and others to constructive madness.
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Downloaded today's snapshot, but...

Postby Braids » 29 Aug 2011, 15:58

timmermac wrote:...it appears to only be r9920, when according to WebSVN, it should be 1002x. Did I grab the wrong thing?
nope. the SVN Rev in the manifest is wrong. Dave or Chris, can you help?

yesterday's build also claims to be 9920.
"That is the dumbest thing I've ever seen." --Rob Cashwalker, regarding Innistrad double-sided cards. One of the first times he and I have ever agreed on something. ;)
User avatar
Braids
Programmer
 
Posts: 556
Joined: 22 Jun 2011, 00:39
Location: Unknown. Hobby: Driving myself and others to constructive madness.
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Downloaded today's snapshot, but...

Postby jendave » 29 Aug 2011, 16:08

I verified that the rev number is wrong. Not sure what is wrong since I doubt Chris was so far behind on updating his local copy. To avoid this issue, I can set the rev check in Maven to automatically update the local copy during the snapshot deployment.
jendave
 
Posts: 307
Joined: 01 Jun 2008, 07:19
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Re: Downloaded today's snapshot, but...

Postby Chris H. » 29 Aug 2011, 17:48

jendave wrote:I verified that the rev number is wrong. Not sure what is wrong since I doubt Chris was so far behind on updating his local copy. To avoid this issue, I can set the rev check in Maven to automatically update the local copy during the snapshot deployment.
`
Yeah, I first merge all of the new work into my local copy. I then run set info script to update the new cards. From there I add in all the commit logs to the changes.txt file.

I then run the nightly build maven script. I can not explain what is happening.
User avatar
Chris H.
Forge Moderator
 
Posts: 6320
Joined: 04 Nov 2008, 12:11
Location: Mac OS X Yosemite
Has thanked: 644 times
Been thanked: 643 times

Re: Downloaded today's snapshot, but...

Postby Chris H. » 30 Aug 2011, 11:43

I just now released the next nightly build. I made sure that I first updated my local copy. The startup screen has the close box and the new card Frenetic Sliver is available.

At the New Game screen I selected Menu -> Stack Report. The Forge Version displayed is my java version and the build ID is displayed as 9920 rather than 10085.
User avatar
Chris H.
Forge Moderator
 
Posts: 6320
Joined: 04 Nov 2008, 12:11
Location: Mac OS X Yosemite
Has thanked: 644 times
Been thanked: 643 times

Re: Downloaded today's snapshot, but...

Postby jendave » 30 Aug 2011, 15:57

Chris H. wrote:I just now released the next nightly build. I made sure that I first updated my local copy. The startup screen has the close box and the new card Frenetic Sliver is available.

At the New Game screen I selected Menu -> Stack Report. The Forge Version displayed is my java version and the build ID is displayed as 9920 rather than 10085.
This is very strange. I just updated and built Forge. The Menu -->Stack Report gives me 10089 as expected. Maybe the BuildNumber Maven plugin does not like Lion? Still, I would think you would get a null or a "0000" (the default I set).
jendave
 
Posts: 307
Joined: 01 Jun 2008, 07:19
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Re: Downloaded today's snapshot, but...

Postby Chris H. » 30 Aug 2011, 16:32

jendave wrote:This is very strange. I just updated and built Forge. The Menu -->Stack Report gives me 10089 as expected. Maybe the BuildNumber Maven plugin does not like Lion? Still, I would think you would get a null or a "0000" (the default I set).
`
This is strange indeed, here is the start of the Stack Report on my machine:

Stack Report | Open
This is a Crash Report. An error has occurred. Please save this message to a file.
Please follow the instructions at this address to submit this Crash Report, plus what you were doing at the time:
http://tinyurl.com/3zzrnyb
Reporting bugs in Forge is very important. We thank you for your time.

You requested a full error report


Version:
Forge version 1.6.0_26, build ID 9920

OS: Mac OS X Version: 10.7.1 Architecture: x86_64

Java Version: 1.6.0_26 Vendor: Apple Inc.

Detailed error trace:

Signal Dispatcher (6):
User avatar
Chris H.
Forge Moderator
 
Posts: 6320
Joined: 04 Nov 2008, 12:11
Location: Mac OS X Yosemite
Has thanked: 644 times
Been thanked: 643 times

Re: Downloaded today's snapshot, but...

Postby Chris H. » 31 Aug 2011, 10:33

In message: Re: Forge Beta: 08-19-2011 ver 1.1.2 rev 9812

jendave wrote:I just put up a new daily build.
http://cardforge.org/releases/snapshots/forge/forge/
`
I downloaded the windows/*nix version (forge-1.1.3-20110831.074528-15.tar.bz2) and ran it with my old shell script that increases the java heap space. I am currently booted into Lion.

I am now looking at the Stack Report. The Forge version number reported is the java version number but the build ID is correct this time around.

Stack Report | Open
This is a Crash Report. An error has occurred. Please save this message to a file.
Please follow the instructions at this address to submit this Crash Report, plus what you were doing at the time:
http://tinyurl.com/3zzrnyb
Reporting bugs in Forge is very important. We thank you for your time.

You requested a full error report


Version:
Forge version 1.6.0_26, build ID 10104

OS: Mac OS X Version: 10.7.1 Architecture: x86_64

Java Version: 1.6.0_26 Vendor: Apple Inc.

Detailed error trace:
User avatar
Chris H.
Forge Moderator
 
Posts: 6320
Joined: 04 Nov 2008, 12:11
Location: Mac OS X Yosemite
Has thanked: 644 times
Been thanked: 643 times

Re: Downloaded today's snapshot, but...

Postby Chris H. » 31 Aug 2011, 15:28

Chris H. wrote:In message: Re: Forge Beta: 08-19-2011 ver 1.1.2 rev 9812

jendave wrote:I just put up a new daily build.
http://cardforge.org/releases/snapshots/forge/forge/
`
I downloaded the windows/*nix version (forge-1.1.3-20110831.074528-15.tar.bz2) and ran it with my old shell script that increases the java heap space. I am currently booted into Lion.

I am now looking at the Stack Report. The Forge version number reported is the java version number but the build ID is correct this time around.

Stack Report | Open
This is a Crash Report. An error has occurred. Please save this message to a file.
Please follow the instructions at this address to submit this Crash Report, plus what you were doing at the time:
http://tinyurl.com/3zzrnyb
Reporting bugs in Forge is very important. We thank you for your time.

You requested a full error report


Version:
Forge version 1.6.0_26, build ID 10104

OS: Mac OS X Version: 10.7.1 Architecture: x86_64

Java Version: 1.6.0_26 Vendor: Apple Inc.

Detailed error trace:
`
I booted into Snow Leopard and tried the same test and got the same results as above. Dave, when you run this test on Snow Leopard, are you getting the java number returned as the Forge version number?
User avatar
Chris H.
Forge Moderator
 
Posts: 6320
Joined: 04 Nov 2008, 12:11
Location: Mac OS X Yosemite
Has thanked: 644 times
Been thanked: 643 times

Re: Downloaded today's snapshot, but...

Postby jendave » 31 Aug 2011, 16:12

Chris H. wrote:
Chris H. wrote:In message: Re: Forge Beta: 08-19-2011 ver 1.1.2 rev 9812

jendave wrote:I just put up a new daily build.
http://cardforge.org/releases/snapshots/forge/forge/
`
I downloaded the windows/*nix version (forge-1.1.3-20110831.074528-15.tar.bz2) and ran it with my old shell script that increases the java heap space. I am currently booted into Lion.

I am now looking at the Stack Report. The Forge version number reported is the java version number but the build ID is correct this time around.

Stack Report | Open
This is a Crash Report. An error has occurred. Please save this message to a file.
Please follow the instructions at this address to submit this Crash Report, plus what you were doing at the time:
http://tinyurl.com/3zzrnyb
Reporting bugs in Forge is very important. We thank you for your time.

You requested a full error report


Version:
Forge version 1.6.0_26, build ID 10104

OS: Mac OS X Version: 10.7.1 Architecture: x86_64

Java Version: 1.6.0_26 Vendor: Apple Inc.

Detailed error trace:
`
I booted into Snow Leopard and tried the same test and got the same results as above. Dave, when you run this test on Snow Leopard, are you getting the java number returned as the Forge version number?
I see the same thing on Snow Leopard. There is a user in the Developing Bugs thread that is using the snapshot I posted last night and the version number appears correctly. I suspect there is an issue with the code that displays the stack report.
jendave
 
Posts: 307
Joined: 01 Jun 2008, 07:19
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 21 times


Return to Forge

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 62 guests

Main Menu

User Menu

Our Partners


Who is online

In total there are 62 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 62 guests (based on users active over the past 10 minutes)
Most users ever online was 7303 on 15 Jul 2025, 20:46

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 62 guests

Login Form