Magic Data
General Discussion of the Intricacies
Moderator: CCGHQ Admins
Re: Magic Data
by Arch » 06 Jul 2011, 11:03
Yes, I agree with not nesting tags. Seems like the better solution of the two. May go with "no" instead of "number" also just to keep it shorter.
Not completely sure about type/kind though. I like type better as that is what it is; "type" is part of the domain we're modelling. You bring up a valid point with "type type" looking wierd though. Maybe supertype/type/subtype-elements are better as you originally proposed.
Typing out some other suggestions to see how they look:
Not completely sure about type/kind though. I like type better as that is what it is; "type" is part of the domain we're modelling. You bring up a valid point with "type type" looking wierd though. Maybe supertype/type/subtype-elements are better as you originally proposed.
Typing out some other suggestions to see how they look:
- Code: Select all
<typelist>
<item type="super">Legendary</item>
<item>Creature</item>
<item type="sub">Bunny</item>
<item type="sub">Ogre</item>
</typelist>
<typelist>
<supertype>Legendary</supertype>
<type>Creature</type>
<subtype>Bunny</subtype>
<subtype>Ogre</subtype>
</typelist>
Re: Magic Data
by Marek14 » 10 Jul 2011, 17:21
The -X costs on planeswalkers should be in brackets like the others.
Re: Magic Data
by melvin » 11 Jul 2011, 06:20
Thanks for the updated schema in the new release.
I noticed that a couple of cards where the abilities are separated by semicolon are not split up correctly.
For example:
Kjeldoran Skycaptain's "Flying; first strike; banding"
Kjeldoran Phalanx's "First strike; banding"
Longbow Archer's "First strike; reach"
I noticed that a couple of cards where the abilities are separated by semicolon are not split up correctly.
For example:
Kjeldoran Skycaptain's "Flying; first strike; banding"
Kjeldoran Phalanx's "First strike; banding"
Longbow Archer's "First strike; reach"
-
melvin - AI Programmer
- Posts: 1062
- Joined: 21 Mar 2010, 12:26
- Location: Singapore
- Has thanked: 36 times
- Been thanked: 459 times
Re: Magic Data
by Arch » 11 Jul 2011, 17:56
New release available.
Noticed that the reminder text for the split abilities are not working. I do not consider that important but will probably fix at some time in the future. Does not affect the text version.
Noticed that the reminder text for the split abilities are not working. I do not consider that important but will probably fix at some time in the future. Does not affect the text version.
Re: Magic Data
by Max mtg » 30 Aug 2011, 23:39
Hi, Arch!
Please correct this:
Please correct this:
- Code: Select all
Snow-Covered Forest
Basic Snow Land - Forest
G
ICE L, CSP C, ME2 L
Snow-Covered Island
Basic Snow Land - Island
U
ICE L, CSP C, ME2 L
Snow-Covered Mountain
Basic Snow Land - Mountain
R
ICE L, CSP C, ME2 L
Snow-Covered Plains
Basic Snow Land - Plains
W
ICE L, CSP C, ME2 L
Snow-Covered Swamp
Basic Snow Land - Swamp
B
ICE L, CSP C, ME2 L
Single class for single responsibility.
- Max mtg
- Programmer
- Posts: 1997
- Joined: 02 Jul 2011, 14:26
- Has thanked: 173 times
- Been thanked: 334 times
Re: Magic Data
by Marek14 » 31 Aug 2011, 04:58
Are you sure? I don't think Coldsnap had a separate land sheet, AFAIK they WERE just commons there...
Re: Magic Data
by Max mtg » 31 Aug 2011, 09:19
Hmm... The Gatherer itself says they were common... but that's somewhat non-logical
Sorry then, I haven't learnt the subject field well.
Sorry then, I haven't learnt the subject field well.
Single class for single responsibility.
- Max mtg
- Programmer
- Posts: 1997
- Joined: 02 Jul 2011, 14:26
- Has thanked: 173 times
- Been thanked: 334 times
Re: Magic Data
by Marek14 » 22 Sep 2011, 05:01
Innistrad Gatherer should be up soon. Let's have a look at what will be their format for double-faced cards...
Re: Magic Data
by Arch » 22 Sep 2011, 20:37
Yeah, or where they're planing to squeeze in the new color-thingy-indicator. I just hope it won't be totally random.
Re: Magic Data
by Marek14 » 23 Sep 2011, 06:14
Hm, I'd put it between mana cost and type line, and I'd mark it with parenthesis to simulate the roundness. Like this:
Civilized Scholar
{U}
Creature - Human Advisor
0/1
: Draw a card, then discard a card. If a creature card is discarded this way, untap Civilized Scholar, then transform it.
----
Homicidal Brute
(R)
Creature - Human Mutant
5/1
At the beginning of your end step, if Homicidal Brute didn't attack this turn, tap Homicidal Brute, then transform it.
ISD U
This format would use the same separator as flip cards, but I think there's no actual danger of confusing the two. Also, I'd put the color indicator on separate line, but it's also possible it could be displayed on type line like this:
(R) Creature - Human Mutant.
That might make it harder to search for some things, of course. I'd put it on a separate line.
I'd write other indicators like (B/G) for Garruk, the Veil-Cursed, (W/U/B/R/G) for Transguild Courier and (C) for Ghostfire.
EDIT: It's on Gatherer now.
Civilized Scholar

Creature - Human Advisor
0/1

----
Homicidal Brute
(R)
Creature - Human Mutant
5/1
At the beginning of your end step, if Homicidal Brute didn't attack this turn, tap Homicidal Brute, then transform it.
ISD U
This format would use the same separator as flip cards, but I think there's no actual danger of confusing the two. Also, I'd put the color indicator on separate line, but it's also possible it could be displayed on type line like this:
(R) Creature - Human Mutant.
That might make it harder to search for some things, of course. I'd put it on a separate line.
I'd write other indicators like (B/G) for Garruk, the Veil-Cursed, (W/U/B/R/G) for Transguild Courier and (C) for Ghostfire.
EDIT: It's on Gatherer now.
Re: Magic Data
by Arch » 24 Sep 2011, 13:14
Download
Updated with Innistrad.
There are no new colormarkers in gatherer. (They did add a 'watermark' for the Mirran/Phyrexian backgrounds - apparently more important.) So transform-cards and cards that had rules indicating their color no longer have any color indication what so ever. Will add some of my own in the future unless they fix that.
Updated with Innistrad.
There are no new colormarkers in gatherer. (They did add a 'watermark' for the Mirran/Phyrexian backgrounds - apparently more important.) So transform-cards and cards that had rules indicating their color no longer have any color indication what so ever. Will add some of my own in the future unless they fix that.
Re: Magic Data
by Marek14 » 24 Sep 2011, 14:30
Then I suggest to use the (B), (U), (B/G), (C) and so on, between the mana cost and the type line... quick before we forget which cards are affected 

Re: Magic Data
by Arch » 25 Sep 2011, 17:15
Also noted that the meta data doesn't contain all cards. Will have a look at that as well, but have some other things I'd like to do first. Can probably release an update next week.
Return to Magic Rules Engine Programming
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests