It is currently 21 Aug 2025, 19:56
   
Text Size

Bug Reports (snapshot builds)

Post MTG Forge Related Programming Questions Here

Moderators: timmermac, Blacksmith, KrazyTheFox, Agetian, friarsol, CCGHQ Admins

Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)

Postby Sloth » 26 Sep 2012, 15:38

mark wrote:The card Cruel Revival cannot be played if there is no zombie card in the graveyard.
Fixed! Thanks mark.

PowerClaws wrote:latest snapshot, the filter boxes in the editor dont work, typing anything then pressing enter does nothing for me

edit: changing the set/format enables the boxes but both act as without (i think)
I made an attempt to fix this. Please try again in the next beta. If it is not working, post exactly what you typed and which fields were checked.

PowerClaws wrote:Lim-Dul the Necromancer's effect doesnt add zombie as a creature type

(Whenever a creature an opponent controls is put into a graveyard from the battlefield, you may pay 1 B. If you do, return that card to the battlefield under your control. If it's a creature, it's a Zombie in addition to its other creature types.
1 B: Regenerate target Zombie.)
Fixed! Thanks PowerClaws.

Almeida wrote:Curse of Misfortunes not working
It works for me. Which version are you using?
Last edited by Chris H. on 26 Sep 2012, 15:57, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Mouse-over
User avatar
Sloth
Programmer
 
Posts: 3498
Joined: 23 Jun 2009, 19:40
Has thanked: 125 times
Been thanked: 507 times

Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)

Postby Almeida » 27 Sep 2012, 05:38

Sloth wrote:
mark wrote:The card Cruel Revival cannot be played if there is no zombie card in the graveyard.
Fixed! Thanks mark.

PowerClaws wrote:latest snapshot, the filter boxes in the editor dont work, typing anything then pressing enter does nothing for me

edit: changing the set/format enables the boxes but both act as without (i think)
I made an attempt to fix this. Please try again in the next beta. If it is not working, post exactly what you typed and which fields were checked.

PowerClaws wrote:Lim-Dul the Necromancer's effect doesnt add zombie as a creature type

(Whenever a creature an opponent controls is put into a graveyard from the battlefield, you may pay 1 B. If you do, return that card to the battlefield under your control. If it's a creature, it's a Zombie in addition to its other creature types.
1 B: Regenerate target Zombie.)
Fixed! Thanks PowerClaws.

Almeida wrote:Curse of Misfortunes not working
It works for me. Which version are you using?
1.2.15 snapshot
User avatar
Almeida
 
Posts: 41
Joined: 24 Dec 2011, 04:48
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time

Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)

Postby mark » 27 Sep 2012, 07:09

AI had Razormane Masticore, I had Sanguine Guard and Deathgreeter on the battlefield.
In AI's draw step 3 damage were assigned to Sanguine Guard, which I regenerated in response. Then suddenly Deathgreeter was put into my graveyard and without any notice.
(The target id was correct though: SG had id 86 and DG had 67, RM targeted 86)
mark
 
Posts: 138
Joined: 28 Dec 2011, 11:32
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)

Postby mark » 27 Sep 2012, 07:52

AI attacked with Phantasmal Bear, I blocked with two Deathgreeter. Both died but Deathgreeter's effect was triggered only once.
mark
 
Posts: 138
Joined: 28 Dec 2011, 11:32
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)

Postby moomarc » 27 Sep 2012, 11:12

mark wrote:AI had Razormane Masticore, I had Sanguine Guard and Deathgreeter on the battlefield.
In AI's draw step 3 damage were assigned to Sanguine Guard, which I regenerated in response. Then suddenly Deathgreeter was put into my graveyard and without any notice.
(The target id was correct though: SG had id 86 and DG had 67, RM targeted 86)
I can confirm that there's definitely something wierd here. Tested further with AI controlling Razormane Masticore and me controlling 2 regenerating creatures. When the trigger targets one of them activate both creatures' regeneration. Resolve the stack and no creatures are tapped and both creatures have their regen shields in tact.
-Marc
User avatar
moomarc
Pixel Commander
 
Posts: 2091
Joined: 04 Jun 2010, 15:22
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 371 times
Been thanked: 372 times

Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)

Postby PowerClaws » 27 Sep 2012, 12:31

Sloth wrote:
PowerClaws wrote:latest snapshot, the filter boxes in the editor dont work, typing anything then pressing enter does nothing for me

edit: changing the set/format enables the boxes but both act as without (i think)
I made an attempt to fix this. Please try again in the next beta. If it is not working, post exactly what you typed and which fields were checked.
It looks like the deck editor is working again, Thanks
PowerClaws
 
Posts: 131
Joined: 30 Jan 2012, 11:33
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)

Postby Jaedayr » 28 Sep 2012, 23:25

9/22 snapshot

AI cast Followed Footsteps on my Noxious Hatchling which had 3 -1/-1 counters on it. The next turn, AI got a token with 0 -1/-1 counters on it.
Jaedayr
Tester
 
Posts: 523
Joined: 08 Jul 2010, 00:06
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)

Postby PowerClaws » 29 Sep 2012, 14:56

The card Consuming Vapors has the text "target opponent sacrifices a creature" but still allows me to choose myself as it should
PowerClaws
 
Posts: 131
Joined: 30 Jan 2012, 11:33
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)

Postby Sloth » 29 Sep 2012, 18:14

Jaedayr wrote:9/22 snapshot

AI cast Followed Footsteps on my Noxious Hatchling which had 3 -1/-1 counters on it. The next turn, AI got a token with 0 -1/-1 counters on it.
Rule 706.2 states Counters on permanents are not copied.

PowerClaws wrote:The card Consuming Vapors has the text "target opponent sacrifices a creature" but still allows me to choose myself as it should
Fixed! Thanks PowerClaws.
User avatar
Sloth
Programmer
 
Posts: 3498
Joined: 23 Jun 2009, 19:40
Has thanked: 125 times
Been thanked: 507 times

Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)

Postby friarsol » 29 Sep 2012, 18:20

Sloth wrote:
Jaedayr wrote:9/22 snapshot

AI cast Followed Footsteps on my Noxious Hatchling which had 3 -1/-1 counters on it. The next turn, AI got a token with 0 -1/-1 counters on it.
Rule 706.2 states Counters on permanents are not copied.
I think he is saying the etb ability of the hatchling isn't copied
friarsol
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 7593
Joined: 15 May 2010, 04:20
Has thanked: 243 times
Been thanked: 965 times

Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)

Postby PowerClaws » 30 Sep 2012, 11:28

Something seems to be occurring with casting spells and activating a signet twice, when i cast a spell (5CMC) the first activation adds the correct mana to the mana pool, but the second activation both adds the mana to the mana pool AND reduces the mana required to cast the spell by 2
PowerClaws
 
Posts: 131
Joined: 30 Jan 2012, 11:33
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)

Postby moomarc » 30 Sep 2012, 11:45

PowerClaws wrote:Something seems to be occurring with casting spells and activating a signet twice, when i cast a spell (5CMC) the first activation adds the correct mana to the mana pool, but the second activation both adds the mana to the mana pool AND reduces the mana required to cast the spell by 2
Which signet are you using? The only signets are the old Ravnica signets and they have nothing to do with cost cutting. If it is those, what are you using to untap them to activate them again for the same cost? :?
-Marc
User avatar
moomarc
Pixel Commander
 
Posts: 2091
Joined: 04 Jun 2010, 15:22
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 371 times
Been thanked: 372 times

Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)

Postby PowerClaws » 30 Sep 2012, 11:48

moomarc wrote:
PowerClaws wrote:Something seems to be occurring with casting spells and activating a signet twice, when i cast a spell (5CMC) the first activation adds the correct mana to the mana pool, but the second activation both adds the mana to the mana pool AND reduces the mana required to cast the spell by 2
Which signet are you using? The only signets are the old Ravnica signets and they have nothing to do with cost cutting. If it is those, what are you using to untap them to activate them again for the same cost? :?
using two orzhov signets, the first signets adds the mana, the other (i think) add two to both the mana pool and to the cast, it ONLY occurs if you do it while paying the cost for a spell
PowerClaws
 
Posts: 131
Joined: 30 Jan 2012, 11:33
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)

Postby ArsenalNut » 30 Sep 2012, 15:03

PowerClaws wrote:
moomarc wrote:
PowerClaws wrote:Something seems to be occurring with casting spells and activating a signet twice, when i cast a spell (5CMC) the first activation adds the correct mana to the mana pool, but the second activation both adds the mana to the mana pool AND reduces the mana required to cast the spell by 2
Which signet are you using? The only signets are the old Ravnica signets and they have nothing to do with cost cutting. If it is those, what are you using to untap them to activate them again for the same cost? :?
using two orzhov signets, the first signets adds the mana, the other (i think) add two to both the mana pool and to the cast, it ONLY occurs if you do it while paying the cost for a spell
I could not reproduce the problem. Here's how I tested.
1) Get 4 Scrublands and 2 Orzhov Signets in play
2) Cast Sorin, Lord of Innistrad
3) Select first signet to pay for Sorin
4) Tap a Scrubland to pay for signet mana ability, then a white and a black mana show up in the manapool.
5) Unchanged cost for Sorin is still displayed and select the other signet
6) Repeat step 4
Final state was 2 white mana and 2 black mana in the manapool and unchanged cost for Sorin.
So many cards, so little time
User avatar
ArsenalNut
 
Posts: 512
Joined: 08 Jul 2011, 03:49
Has thanked: 27 times
Been thanked: 121 times

Re: Bug Reports (snapshot builds)

Postby PowerClaws » 01 Oct 2012, 04:00

ArsenalNut wrote:I could not reproduce the problem. Here's how I tested.
1) Get 4 Scrublands and 2 Orzhov Signets in play
2) Cast Sorin, Lord of Innistrad
3) Select first signet to pay for Sorin
4) Tap a Scrubland to pay for signet mana ability, then a white and a black mana show up in the manapool.
5) Unchanged cost for Sorin is still displayed and select the other signet
6) Repeat step 4
Final state was 2 white mana and 2 black mana in the manapool and unchanged cost for Sorin.
I did this twice, once casting both signets using the lands, the other had one signet paid by the other signet, it occurred for the second case only
PowerClaws
 
Posts: 131
Joined: 30 Jan 2012, 11:33
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 8 times

PreviousNext

Return to Developer's Corner

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests

Main Menu

User Menu

Our Partners


Who is online

In total there are 13 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 13 guests (based on users active over the past 10 minutes)
Most users ever online was 7303 on 15 Jul 2025, 20:46

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests

Login Form