Feature Requests Thread

[Niv-Mizzet]

The old Shandalar game had a neat feature where you could "run the gauntlet" against a predetermined number of computer opponents. You would win if you could defeat them all in a row, but lose if you lost a match.

I think this would be a fun way to play Forge, especially if sideboards ever get implemented.

[Almost_Clever]

Can the game keep track of your records (wins/losses in games and matches) against the various AI opponents in the quest mode? How about in draft mode against opponents # 1 - 7?

[mtgrares]

Can the game keep track of your records (wins/losses in games and matches) against the various AI opponents in the quest mode? How about in draft mode against opponents # 1 - 7?

Right now, no. I did think about it but I wasn't sure where to show the user the information.

[pawel345]

I wonder if it would be possible to add a multiplayer hot seat funcion. I some times would rather play ageinst myself than the AI, as altrough it's quite good for such a game it's not the best possible.

[Rob Cashwalker]

That would be interesting.... I don't think it's terribly far-fetched either.

[Mr.Chaos]

I like the idea of multiplayer hot seat so you can play both sides. Gets my vote! (where is the "thumbs up" smiley when you need it?)

[zerker2000]

Shouldn't be too hard... as long as AllZone.Player.Computer is hotwired into a "AllZone.PLayer.Human2".

[Rob Cashwalker]

There are quite a number of points where the player is tested either computer or human. All it would require is a slight change in the logic for all those comparisons to be more like

Code: Select all

if (AllZone.Player.getActivePlayer().isHuman())
{
...
}
else if (AllZone.Player.getActivePlayer().isComputer())
{
...
}



[slappysquirrel]

i have a reply. i notice sometimes, i mess up and accidently tap a wrong land, or too many (cuz they are stacked). if there was a "go back" feature that'd be cool. ie: untap your land to get mana back cuz you screwed up. dont know if im the only one that's done that. or perhaps, go back so you can "select blockers" cuz the message screen can be confusing since there are so many during the opposing attack phase.

[pawel345]

If you add the muliplayer funcion than maby it would be possible to play ageinst 2 or 3 oponents at the same time, althrough I guess it would be qite complicated

[Mr.Chaos]

If you add the muliplayer funcion than maby it would be possible to play ageinst 2 or 3 oponents at the same time, althrough I guess it would be qite complicated

Although I like the idea, I fear it would just increase the chances of the AI going nuts on you.Besides, the game tends to slow down due to some sort of memory leak problem. I think that would multiply if you have even more players in a game. In other words, maybe later. Much later.

[DennisBergkamp]

Many many years from now

[Corwin72]

I would love it if after you finished a match the deck selection screen remembered what deck you had selected.

[wolan]

As all people who played Shandallar i'm missing something from that game.

It would be great if you could add some "phase tracker" (Color changing buttons maybe ?) to let the player be avare of what to do now.
I'm catchin my self at trying to play lands in opponent turn because I click "ok" to many times.

As for me if You can make something like Shandallar with more cards it will be huge sucess

[Incantus]

I wonder if it would be possible to add a multiplayer hot seat funcion. I some times would rather play ageinst myself than the AI, as altrough it's quite good for such a game it's not the best possible.

You can do this with Incantus.