It is currently 17 Sep 2025, 17:26
   
Text Size

[Old confirmed] Bug Archive

Moderators: BAgate, drool66, Aswan jaguar, gmzombie, stassy, CCGHQ Admins

Re: [confirmed]Arashi, the Sky Asunder

Postby Gargaroz » 18 Aug 2012, 15:36

The first bug is already fixed, I'll investigate the second.
----
- Current / medium term task: adjusting the code for making Misdirection and such usable
- Long term task: inserting all the good stuff I left out from the "Golden Years" mod
Gargaroz
Programmer
 
Posts: 7097
Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 11:11
Has thanked: 82 times
Been thanked: 595 times

[confirmed]Sway of the Stars + That Which Was Taken

Postby stassy » 21 Aug 2012, 06:35

Describe the Bug:
If a divinity counter attached to a permanent created from That Which Was Taken is present in the bf when Sway of the Stars is cast, it will stay in the bf after resolution.

Which card did behave improperly ?
Sway of the Stars + That Which Was Taken

Which update are you using?(date,name)Which type(Duel,Gauntlet,Sealed Deck)
KamiV3

What exactly should be the correct behavior/interaction ?
If a divinity counter attached to a permanent created from That Which Was Taken is present in the bf when Sway of the Stars is cast, it will not stay in the bf after resolution.

Are any other cards possibly affected by this bug ?
Sway of the Stars + spell enchantment divinity token/counter?

Image
Attachments
1.zip
(2.3 KiB) Downloaded 253 times
Last edited by Aswan jaguar on 21 Aug 2012, 08:00, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: confirmed bug
stassy
Moderator
 
Posts: 5274
Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 07:06
Has thanked: 471 times
Been thanked: 337 times

Re: [confirmed]Sway of the Stars + That Which Was Taken

Postby Aswan jaguar » 21 Aug 2012, 08:03

I confirm the bug and probably that is the case for all Legacy effects.
What is interesting is that the effect attached itself to a black Lotus I cast the turn after I played Sway of the Stars.
---
Trying to squash some bugs and playtesting.
User avatar
Aswan jaguar
Super Tester Elite
 
Posts: 8131
Joined: 13 May 2010, 12:17
Has thanked: 748 times
Been thanked: 479 times

[confirmed]Spell Crumple

Postby stassy » 24 Aug 2012, 13:34

Describe the Bug:
Spell Crumple doesn't counter target spell when cast.

Which card did behave improperly ?
Spell Crumple

Which update are you using?(date,name)Which type(Duel,Gauntlet,Sealed Deck)
KamiV3

What exactly should be the correct behavior/interaction ?
Spell Crumple counter target spell when cast.

Are any other cards possibly affected by this bug ?
-

Spell Crumple work correctly on AI side
Attachments
1.zip
(2.9 KiB) Downloaded 263 times
Last edited by Aswan jaguar on 24 Aug 2012, 17:18, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: confirmed bug
stassy
Moderator
 
Posts: 5274
Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 07:06
Has thanked: 471 times
Been thanked: 337 times

Re: [confirmed]Spell Crumple

Postby Gargaroz » 24 Aug 2012, 21:46

That's strange, as code an values seems fine. What exactly happens, did Spell Crumple go on the bottom of your deck ?
----
- Current / medium term task: adjusting the code for making Misdirection and such usable
- Long term task: inserting all the good stuff I left out from the "Golden Years" mod
Gargaroz
Programmer
 
Posts: 7097
Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 11:11
Has thanked: 82 times
Been thanked: 595 times

Re: [confirmed]Spell Crumple

Postby stassy » 25 Aug 2012, 06:52

Yes, as you cast it, the countered spell still process and Spell Crumple go to the bottom of library
stassy
Moderator
 
Posts: 5274
Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 07:06
Has thanked: 471 times
Been thanked: 337 times

[confirmed]AI - Phyrexian Colossus

Postby Aswan jaguar » 27 Aug 2012, 16:24

Describe the Bug:
AI can't get it has to assign at least 3 blockers to block Phyrexian Colossus and don't get the damage.

Which card did behave improperly ?
AI - Phyrexian Colossus

Which update are you using?(date,name)Which type(Duel,Gauntlet,Sealed Deck)
ML3.0 kamigawav3,sealed

What exactly should be the correct behavior/interaction ?
AI gets that if he doesn't assign 3 blockers Phyrexian Colossus will still do assign damage to player.


Are any other cards possibly affected by this bug ?
Attachments
phyrexian collosus.png
Last edited by stassy on 28 Aug 2012, 09:30, edited 2 times in total.
Reason: renaming to correct bug behaviour
---
Trying to squash some bugs and playtesting.
User avatar
Aswan jaguar
Super Tester Elite
 
Posts: 8131
Joined: 13 May 2010, 12:17
Has thanked: 748 times
Been thanked: 479 times

[confirmed]Carnage Wurm

Postby Aswan jaguar » 27 Aug 2012, 18:21

Describe the Bug:
Carnage Wurm bloodthirst ability doesn't work it comes with no +3/+3 counters if opponent got damaged this turn.

Which card did behave improperly ?
Carnage Wurm

Which update are you using?(date,name)Which type(Duel,Gauntlet,Sealed Deck)
ML3.0 KamigawaV3,sealed

What exactly should be the correct behavior/interaction ?
Carnage Wurm bloodthirst ability does work.

Are any other cards possibly affected by this bug ?
Attachments
carnage wurm.zip
(15.64 KiB) Downloaded 305 times
Last edited by stassy on 28 Aug 2012, 09:23, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: bug confirmed
---
Trying to squash some bugs and playtesting.
User avatar
Aswan jaguar
Super Tester Elite
 
Posts: 8131
Joined: 13 May 2010, 12:17
Has thanked: 748 times
Been thanked: 479 times

Re: Carnage Wurm bloodthirst ability doesn't work

Postby stassy » 28 Aug 2012, 09:23

confirmed but only on combat damage, if opponent is dealt spell damage Carnage Wurm will trigger his Bloodthirst ability.

I tested it in a clean game, but with your save Bloodthirst seems to be not working at all, must be another interaction or effect carried over in Tournament mode.

Image
stassy
Moderator
 
Posts: 5274
Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 07:06
Has thanked: 471 times
Been thanked: 337 times

Re: AI - Phyrexian Colossus

Postby stassy » 28 Aug 2012, 09:30

confirmed though I think it's quite hard to code, on AI side it happen the same but the defending player can manually choose to assign 3+ blockers so the combat damage are not dealt to him (if he choose to assign less than 3 blockers damage go through as if the attacking creature had trample).
stassy
Moderator
 
Posts: 5274
Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 07:06
Has thanked: 471 times
Been thanked: 337 times

Re: [confirmed]Carnage Wurm

Postby Aswan jaguar » 28 Aug 2012, 13:56

It's really strange I made another game and Carnage Wurm worked fine with an instant( lightning Bolt ) and with combat damage.
It can't be a sealed tour problem as other cards with bloodthirst in the same tour worked fine.It has to be another interaction but can't find what.
---
Trying to squash some bugs and playtesting.
User avatar
Aswan jaguar
Super Tester Elite
 
Posts: 8131
Joined: 13 May 2010, 12:17
Has thanked: 748 times
Been thanked: 479 times

[confirmed]Rusted Relic

Postby AlexFolland » 28 Aug 2012, 17:52

Rusted Relic is not a creature when I control 3 or more artifacts. In my test, I controlled 8 artifacts before Rusted Relic entered the battlefield. I have not tested having 2 artifacts, then adding a third to see if it switches at that point.

screenshot: can't post due to forum error that says "Your post looks too spamy for a new user, please remove off-site URLs."

Well, it's here anyway: h t t p : / / dl . dropbox . com /u/35695760/0000033D.png
Last edited by stassy on 28 Aug 2012, 18:15, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: bug confirmed
AlexFolland
 
Posts: 41
Joined: 28 Aug 2012, 15:38
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Rusted Relic

Postby stassy » 28 Aug 2012, 18:14

I can confirm it but seems to be an issue with artifact land as using non artifact land will trigger Rusted Relic.
Also when using artifact lands, if you try to cast Rusted Relic with them mana will be put back into the mana pool once (casting Rusting Relic again will work but it won't trigger to artifact count, probably broken at that step)

I don't know if it's possible for new account but you can try to attach your image with your post (below your edit post there is an option Upload attachment)
stassy
Moderator
 
Posts: 5274
Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 07:06
Has thanked: 471 times
Been thanked: 337 times

Re: [confirmed]Rusted Relic

Postby AlexFolland » 28 Aug 2012, 18:57

You're using "trigger" strangely. Rusted Relic doesn't have any activated or triggered abilities. Becoming a creature isn't put on the stack here. If its controller controls 3 or more artifacts, Rusted Relic is meant to be an artifact creature as part of that game state.

I guess regarding the computer game, Rusted Relic's controller controlling 3 or more artifacts should be among the checks any time the game state changes, which is probably how Mox Opal works, which isn't bugged.
AlexFolland
 
Posts: 41
Joined: 28 Aug 2012, 15:38
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: [confirmed]Rusted Relic

Postby stassy » 28 Aug 2012, 19:13

I am not using the technical vocabulary from mtg rule codex but the ML game engine one, which still use the old rules and "programming" states, pardon my french ;)

Anyway it's an interaction issue between artifact lands and Rusted Relic, not an issue with the number of artifact in play.
stassy
Moderator
 
Posts: 5274
Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 07:06
Has thanked: 471 times
Been thanked: 337 times

PreviousNext

Return to Archived Reports

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests

Main Menu

User Menu

Our Partners


Who is online

In total there are 15 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 15 guests (based on users active over the past 10 minutes)
Most users ever online was 7967 on 09 Sep 2025, 23:08

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests

Login Form